Canada: Put Your Docks Up!

Last Updated: May 11 2016
Article by Kathleen Higgins

Municipalities often struggle to address contentious local issues through zoning bylaws out of fear that their actions will be subject to legal challenge.

On March 31, 2016 the B.C. Supreme Court rendered its decision in Dong v. Bowen Island Municipality, 2016 BCSC 553. The case was the culmination of a long and bitter feud that pitted long-time residents of Bowen Island against municipal council and other residents with respect to the construction of docks on the southwest coast of the island.

Dong provides a case study of a municipal council doing everything right in the course of adopting a zoning bylaw to address the concerns of residents


The petitioners in the case were Shu Lin Dong and Zhen Wang who had each purchased a waterfront lot in the Cape Roger Curtis ("CRC") area which was a popular waterfront area for residents of Bowen Island. Both owners wanted to construct docks on the foreshore in front of their lots. Three similar docks on nearby lots had already been approved by the Province and constructed by the time the municipal council took action. These docks were long and narrow and measured 4 feet in width and 280 to 400 feet in length.1

In response to widespread resident concern about the docks, council passed bylaws regulating the construction of docks in 2013. Despite these bylaws, residents remained concerned and it became an election issue in the fall of 2014. Four members from a group named "Stop the Docks" were elected to council. When the petitioners' applications for building permits were pending, council proposed and adopted a bylaw prohibiting all private docks in the CRC area.

The petitioners challenged the bylaw on the following grounds:

  • the bylaw was ultra vires because it was inconsistent with the Official Community Plan ("OCP");
  • the bylaw was passed in haste and in bad faith;
  • the bylaw was discriminatory; and
  • there were procedural fairness concerns due to inadequate public disclosure, inadequate public consultation and certain counsellors failing to consider the matter objectively.

The municipality's response to these grounds was:

  • it acted in good faith;
  • the bylaw was consistent with its OCP;
  • zoning is discriminatory by its very nature;
  • there was no improper motive in enacting the bylaw; and
  • there was no breach of procedural fairness.

The Decision

In a well written decision, the chambers judge, Justice Punnett, carefully considered the substance of the petitioners' complaints.

Consistency with OCP

The chambers judge first considered the issue of whether the bylaw was inconsistent with the OCP. He found that the petitioners' argument attempted to "cherry pick certain provisions of the OCP" to the exclusion of others. When looking at other parts of the OCP, it became clear that the bylaw was consistent with the municipality's other public interest and environmental objectives. He took into account the "extensive material the municipal council had before it in considering the bylaw", including a comprehensive planning department report that directly addressed the bylaw's consistency with the OCP.

Bad Faith

With respect to the petitioners' argument that the municipality acted in bad faith by specifically targeting the petitioners, he found no evidence of improper motive and bias and ultimately concluded that the council acted within its jurisdiction and was motivated by the public interest in adopting the bylaw.


In considering whether the bylaw was discriminatory, he swiftly dismissed that argument holding that "zoning bylaws are by their nature inherently discriminatory, in that some uses are permitted and some are not". He held that the councillors who voted in favour had not discriminated against the petitioners with an improper motive merely because they held strong views on the issue of private docks in the CRC area.

Procedural Fairness

With respect to the petitioners' argument that the municipality should have disclosed environmental reports included in their applications prior to the public hearing, the chambers judge acknowledged that there was a disclosure requirement, which required the council to disclose materials it was considering in the course of making its decision. However, he concluded that the 255 pages of written material disclosed by the municipality met that requirement. He also rejected other procedural fairness arguments, holding that the municipality had fully complied with the public notice and hearing provisions in the Local Government Act and, in fact, went beyond those requirements by considering an additional staff report and the public hearing outcomes before proceeding to third reading and adopting the bylaw.

Legitimate Expectations

In considering whether the petitioners had a legitimate expectation that the existing regulatory framework would not be changed from the time they initially applied to build a dock to the approval and completion of the dock, the chambers judge ruled that the doctrine of legitimate expectations did not go that far because the municipality was making a legislative and not an administrative decision.

Final Thoughts

This case demonstrates the types of steps that a municipality can take to protect itself from subsequent legal challenges to bylaws. The following are the steps that the municipal council undertook, which were significant to Justice Punnett's decision:

  • the municipal council considered a comprehensive planning department report that directly addressed whether the proposed bylaw was consistent with the OCP;
  • the municipality disclosed a significant amount of information prior to the public hearing, which satisfied the court that it had provided all relevant information that council would consider in making its decision;
  • the municipality complied with the public notice and hearing requirements of the Local Government Act and went even further by considering the response to the public hearing before voting on adoption of the bylaw; and
  • the bylaw was drafted such that it impacted an entire area and was not "targeted" only to the lot owners that had already applied to build a dock.

Dong also confirms the deferential approach that courts will take when it comes to reviewing zoning decisions of municipalities that do not exceed their statutory powers. These are political decisions and property owners who disagree with them should seek their redress at the ballot box and not in the courtroom.


1 The length of a football field is 360 feet.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions