ARTICLE
28 July 2014

No Builders’ Lien Act (Alberta) Deemed Trust In Bankruptcy

AB
Aird & Berlis LLP

Contributor

Aird & Berlis LLP is a leading Canadian law firm, serving clients across Canada and globally. With strong national and international expertise, the firm’s lawyers and business advisors provide strategic legal advice across all areas of business law to clients ranging from entrepreneurs to multinational corporations.
The Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta held that the trust created by section 22 of the Builders’ Lien Act is not effective in the bankruptcy of a would-be trustee debtor.
Canada Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Aird & Berlis LLP are most popular:
  • with Senior Company Executives, HR and Finance and Tax Executives
  • with readers working within the Business & Consumer Services, Healthcare and Property industries

In its June 11, 2014 decision in Iona Contractors Ltd. (Re), 2014 ABQB 347 ("Iona Contractors"), the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (the "Alberta QB") held that the trust created by section 22 of the Builders' Lien Act (Alberta) is not effective in the bankruptcy of a would-be trustee debtor. This result is consistent with, but reached completely independently of, the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. Atlas Block Co. Limited, 2014 ONSC 3062 ("Atlas Block") which held, among other things, that a trust claim pursuant to section 8 of the Construction Lien Act (Ontario) (the "CLA") does not survive bankruptcy unless it also bears all the marks of a valid common law trust.

Where the Atlas Block decision had to address a broad range of issues and left some readers wanting more explanation of how Justice Penny overcame what was regarded as the long-standing legal principle that CLA trusts survive in bankruptcy, the Iona Contracting decision thankfully provides a more fulsome discussion of the issue. In particular, Iona Contracting deals head-on with the 1962 decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (the "SCC") in John M.M. Troup Ltd. v. Royal Bank, [1962] S.C.R. 487 ("Troup"), which seems to have formed the underpinning of the legal analysis that statutory construction trusts do survive in bankruptcy. Justice Eidsvik of the Alberta QB held that Troup was effectively overruled because it had been considered in the SCC's decision in Husky Oil Operations Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue [1995] 3 S.C.R. 453 ("Husky Oil"), yet was at odds with an application, to statutory construction trusts, of the principles laid out in Husky Oil and in the SCC's earlier decision in British Columbia v. Henfrey Samson Belair Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 24.

With the same conclusion being reached in parallel by separate courts in Iona Contractors and Atlas Block, it seems safe to conclude that the legal landscape has now shifted for the construction and lending industries.

The Financial Services Group at Aird & Berlis LLP has a great deal of experience both in advising lenders on potential construction and other priorities issues and in addressing priorities issues that arise in insolvency and restructuring.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More