On 12 May 2015, the Commonwealth Treasurer, Joe Hockey MP, delivered the Federal Budget for 2015–2016 (the "Federal Budget"). One of the announced changes involves amendments to the interaction between the current government-funded Paid Parental Leave ("PPL") scheme and employer-funded PPL schemes. The government-funded PPL scheme entitles employees to 18 weeks' PPL at the national minimum wage, totalling $11,500, when they take time off work to care for a newborn or recently adopted child.

Currently, employees are eligible for government-funded PPL payments even if they are also receiving payments from an employer-funded PPL scheme. This means that employees can receive dual payments while on PPL, from both the government and their employer. As a practical matter, however, many employers have made their PPL schemes complementary to the government schemes, by "topping up" the government-funded payments to ensure that employees on PPL receive their usual salary.

If the proposed change is passed, employees will no longer be eligible to access the government-funded PPL scheme if their employer provides a more generous scheme. As such, only employees receiving less than 18 weeks' PPL at minimum wage will be eligible to receive government-funded payments. When the employer's scheme offers less than the government-funded scheme, the employee will receive "top-up" payments from the government for up 18 weeks at minimum wage, which currently represents approximately $11,500 in total.

The government intends to implement this change from 1 July 2016. The Treasurer has estimated that the change will represent a cost saving to the government of nearly $1 billion. However, it remains to be seen whether Parliament will pass this component of the Federal Budget.

Lessons for Employers

If this change is passed by Parliament, employers will need to consider the appropriateness of offering their own PPL schemes. This decision will clearly be informed by other considerations relevant for employers, including the impact of offering PPL benefits on an employer's ability to recruit and retain employees. However, depending on how the legislation implementing the proposed change is drafted, it may be open to employers to provide other incentives fulfilling those purposes, such as payments made when an employee returns to work.

Any alterations to an employer's existing PPL scheme could raise practical and legal challenges. Such schemes are often set out in employment contracts, employment policies and enterprise agreements. This means that employers could be bound to uphold such schemes, and PPL schemes could be difficult to change quickly. Employers may be obliged to continue providing employees with their existing PPL entitlements under those instruments, unless employers can amend or renegotiate the aspects of those instruments dealing with PPL.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.