New Zealand: Review with caution: trade competitors and judicial review under the Resource Management Act 1991

Last Updated: 15 June 2019
Article by Mike Doesburg and Jesse Aimer
Most Read Contributor in New Zealand, September 2019

Sheffield Properties Limited v Kapiti Coast District Council & Ors [2018] NZHC 3290
A recent High Court decision demonstrates the difficulties faced by trade competitors, with ulterior commercial motives, challenging decisions made under the Resource Management Act 1991 (Act).


In early 2016, the Kapiti Coast District Council (Council) notified a private plan change known as "Private Plan Change 84 – Airport Zone" (Plan Change). The Plan Change sought to alter the activity status of certain retail activities in the Airport Zone of the Kapiti Coast District Plan (District Plan) from prohibited to discretionary or non-complying. The Plan Change was requested by Kapiti Coast Airport Holdings Ltd (KCAHL) to allow it to seek resource consents for retail development in the Airport Zone.

Seven parties made submissions on the Plan Change, including Sheffield Properties Ltd (Sheffield), the owner of Coastlands Shopping Centre and other interests in the Paraparaumu town centre. While the Plan Change was being processed, KCAHL successfully applied for a declaration from the Environment Court that Sheffield was a trade competitor of KCAHL. However, despite the Environment Court's declaration, Sheffield provided written submissions and evidence, and made oral submissions, on the proposed Plan Change. In September 2017, the Independent Hearing Panel recommended that the Plan Change be approved. The Council adopted the recommendation and publicly notified its decision. The decision was not appealed.

Sheffield sought a judicial review of the Council's decision to approve the plan change on three grounds:

  1. The decision failed to determine whether prohibited activity status was the most appropriate activity status, with the Panel applying the wrong legal test in relation to prohibited activity status;
  2. Changes were made to the District Plan which were not on the Plan Change and were, therefore, outside of the Council's jurisdiction; and
  3. The Council failed to take into account the Wellington Regional Policy Statement.

Both KCAHL and the Council applied to strike-out Sheffield's application for judicial review. The grounds relied on were:

  1. Judicial review is barred by s 296 of the Act;
  2. The proceeding was brought with undue and prejudicial delay; and
  3. The proceeding was an abuse of the Court's process.

The Court's findings

Section 296 RMA

After reviewing the strike-out principles contained in High Court Rule 15.1, the Court considered section 296 of the Act, which prevents a party from applying to the High Court for judicial review if it has a right of appeal to the Environment Court.
The Council submitted that, as Sheffield made submissions in opposition to the Plan Change, it had a right of appeal to the Environment Court. Therefore, section 296 of the Act barred Sheffield from applying to the High Court for judicial review. In the alternative, it argued that, if Sheffield was barred from appealing to the Environment Court because its submissions were on trade competition issues, then it had no genuine interest in the Council's decision and, as a result, lacked standing to bring the proceeding.

Sheffield submitted that, as a trade competitor, it was barred from applying to the Environment Court. As such, Sheffield argued it was barred by section 296 of the Act from bringing judicial review proceedings in the High Court. Sheffield also relied upon the Privy Council's decision in McGuire v Hastings District Council, which held the High Court has a residual jurisdiction to hear proceedings that would otherwise be prevented by section 296 of the Act.

The Court accepted that its jurisdiction may not be totally excluded by section 296. However, the Court emphasised that any residual jurisdiction was intended to be limited and did not apply in this case. It was Parliament's intention that the Act not be used to further a trade competitor's interests over its rivals and the judicial review procedure should not be used to circumvent that. The Court accepted the Council's submissions and held Sheffield had an opportunity to appeal under the Act but chose not to do so. As Sheffield did not exercise its right of appeal, section 296 precluded it from applying for judicial review. The Court held this ground was sufficient reason to strike out Sheffield's judicial review application.


The Court also found that Sheffield's delay in bringing the proceedings, pointed to a pattern of behaviour on the part of Sheffield of attempting to interfere with the development of a trade competitor. This finding contributed to the Court's overall decision that Sheffield's claim was an abuse of the Court's process.

Ulterior motive

In light of its findings in relation to Sheffield's failure to appeal the Council's decision, and the delay in filing the judicial review application, the Court concluded that Sheffield brought the proceeding:
not to raise legitimate public law concerns with the process followed by the Council, but with the predominant ulterior purpose of protecting its commercial interests and stifling the development of KCAHL's land holdings.

Accordingly, the Court held Sheffield's ulterior motive was an abuse of process and the application for judicial review should be struck out.

Our comment

The decision confirms the wide reach of section 296 of the Act. In most cases, parties must utilise their right of appeal to the Environment Court, or lose the ability to seek review of a council decision altogether. While the High Court retains some residual jurisdiction to hear judicial review applications despite the section 296 bar, trade competitors will find it particularly challenging to fit within this residual scope.

The decision fits within the Act's wider scheme of limiting the participation of trade competitors in resource management decisions. The Court's finding that Sheffield's application was an abuse of the Court's process acts as a warning to trade competitors to tread carefully when considering judicial review of resource management decisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions