New Zealand: Wellington Fish and Game Council v Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council [2017] NZEnvc 37 – summary of the One Plan Declarations

Last Updated: 2 May 2017
Article by Kirstie Wyss
  1. This decision of the Environment Court concerns an application for various declarations made by Wellington Fish and Game Council (Fish and Game) and the Environmental Defence Society Inc (EDS) that the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (MWRC) has been failing to correctly implement the Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Plan (One Plan).1
  2. The declarations ultimately made by the Environment Court provide a timely reminder about the obligations on and the legal requirements for consent authorities when considering applications for resource consents, particularly for restricted discretionary activities. It also reinforces the importance of managing within freshwater limits, despite the sometimes difficult nature of this task. A broad overview of the decision is set out below. The declarations made by the Court are set out in Appendix A.


  1. The Applicants sought declarations that the provisions relating to restricted discretionary activities under Rules 14.2 and 14.4 of the One Plan had not been properly applied, and that various provisions of the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPSFM) and the RMA had not been properly considered in respect of applications for restricted discretionary activities.
  2. Rules 14.2 and 14.4 of the One Plan provide for specified existing intensive farming activities and new intensive farming activities, respectively, as restricted discretionary activities (covering both the use of land and particular associated discharges, e.g. fertiliser).
  3. The One Plan contains a table of "cumulative nitrogen leaching maximum values" (being the total kilograms of nitrogen leached per hectare per year for the total area of a farm), which were calculated using OVERSEER version 5.4. Existing intensive farming activities that meet these leaching limits can obtain consent as a controlled activity (subject to compliance with other conditions). Non-compliance with the limits, or new intensive farming activities, requires resource consent as a restricted discretionary activity under Rules 14.2 and 14.4. A key issue at the hearing was what was required and allowed in terms of the law in assessing the restricted discretionary activity applications.
  4. The release of a new version of OVERSEER (version 6) significantly changed the estimates of nitrogen loss to water and also meant that more farmers required a restricted discretionary activity consent. One of the matters of discretion under Rule 14.2 and 14.4 is "the extent of non-compliance with the cumulative nitrogen leaching maximum specified in Table 14.2".
  5. Under both Rule 14.2 and 14.4, another matter of discretion was the "preparation and compliance with a Nutrient Management Plan for the land". The One Plan defines the Nutrient Management Plan, including the methodology as to how it is prepared and what it is to contain.
  6. MWRC had a practice of granting resource consents under Rules 14.2 and 14.4 with a condition or an advice note allowing for adjustments to the leaching limits to be made, as follows:
    1. When granting resource consents, there is a condition requiring compliance with a Sustainable Milk Plan (SMP).
    2. The SMP is included with the consent at the time consent is granted.
    3. There is an advice note in the SMP making it clear the SMP will be updated to reflect new versions of OVERSEER.
    4. Council officers carry out that exercise in accordance with that advice note.
  1. MWRC rely on a consent condition and the note embedded in the SMP itself to carry out updates to the SMP based on the latest version of OVERSEER. However, the SMP itself was different to the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan required under the One Plan provisions.
  2. MWRC had also adopted a resolution that purported to confirm the resource consent process for nutrient management activities, including a statement that for restricted discretionary activities a consent term of 15-20 years "will be given" where an existing intensive farming activity met specified criteria (e.g. the farm operating system is economically and environmentally efficient and no low cost options are available). MWRC had been relying on the resolution when making decisions on resource consents, including using the resolution as justification to effectively circumvent the policy framework and grant resource consents that did not comply with the nutrient limits set out in the One Plan (no application for such activities had been declined by the MWRC).


  1. In respect of the resolution, MWRC revoked the resolution before the Court could determine the issue. However, the Court considered that the issue was sufficiently important to issue a more general declaration. The Court considered that it was unlawful, invalid and a contravention of the RMA to have regard to the factors set out in the resolution. The Court also noted that it would not have agreed that the resolution would have been able to be considered as an "other matter" under section 104 of the RMA.
  2. The Court also issued a declaration in respect of the Council's duties when considering an application for a restricted discretionary activity. Although the declaration ultimately turns on the particular matters to which MWRC's discretion was restricted under Rule 14.2 and 14.4 of the One Plan, there are some general principles that can be taken from the declaration, as follows:
    1. It is important that councils have regard to all the matters over which discretion is restricted in the relevant rule/s.
    2. For matters to which its discretion has been restricted, councils must consider the actual and potential effects on the environment, which in accordance with the definition of "effects" in section 3 of the RMA, includes both positive and adverse effects, effects that are past, present and future, and also any cumulative effect which arises over time or in combination with other effects.
    3. Sections 104 and 104C provide that the provisions of higher order documents, including the National Environmental Standard for Drinking Water, the NPSFM, the regional policy statement (and any proposed regional policy statement) are relevant and require consideration on an application for resource consent for a restricted discretionary activity, insofar as the provisions relate to matters over which discretion has been restricted (and subject to the provisos in King Salmon2).
    4. Section 105 adds to the matters in section 104(1) which the consent authority must have regard to when considering applications for a discharge permit, again to the extent that it is relevant.
  1. The Court also found that there were deficiencies in many of the applications for resource consent, including in MWRC's template application forms. The Court considered that an application for resource consent must contain an assessment of the environmental effects that meets the requirements of Schedule 4 of the RMA, along with an assessment against the objectives and policies of the relevant regional plan, and an assessment against section 105 of the RMA (insofar as it is relevant). However, the applicant does not have an obligation to include an assessment against section 107, which is instead an obligation imposed on councils.
  2. The Court concluded that it was not acceptable for MWRC to "fill the gap" by resorting to requesting further information under section 92 of the RMA for fundamental elements of a consent application, such as those matters that should be addressed in an AEE. The Court noted that guidance material prepared by the MWRC (including template application forms, supporting information) should be accurate and complete, as applicants, their advisors and council officers, processing consent applications, often rely on such material.
  3. There was also evidence before the Court that many of the consents granted by MWRC were unclear as to the extent of the activities authorised by the consent, particularly in respect of ancillary discharges. Many of the resource consents also included advice notes purporting to fetter enforcement action that can be taken by the Council in respect of farming practices, or specifying that annual records showing compliance with Nutrient Management Plans will only be required if there are discrepancies with the Nutrient Budget.
  4. In respect of the resource consents granted by MWRC, the Court considered that:
    1. A resource consent should adequately define the ambit and scope of the activity authorised, including to explicitly specify which discharges of contaminants are authorised under the consent.
    2. Advice notes or consent conditions purporting to fetter enforcement are unlawful under the RMA.
    3. Advice notes are also an unsuitable approach to dealing with nutrient budgets and are uncertain in nature and effect and likely to present compliance and enforcement problems.
  1. The Court also considered that discharges associated with intensive farming activities under Rules 14.2 and 14.4 did not extend to the diffuse excretion of effluent onto pasture by farm animals. However, this was due to the specific discharges listed in those rules. The Court noted that discharges under section 15(1) require a resource consent unless the discharge is expressly allowed. It seems that the Court is suggesting that diffuse discharges from animals are regulated by the RMA, without conclusively deciding the point. As this issue remains unsettled, and has plagued regional councils, industry and environmental groups alike, there is likely to be further litigation on this point in the future.
  2. The Court was also critical of MWRC's practice of including nitrogen leaching limits in the SMP, instead of in a condition of consent and including advice notes (or conditions) allowing for the nitrogen leaching limit to be updated by the Regulatory Manager at any time and by an undefined methodology. The Court also considered that in respect of the SMP:
    1. Although a management plan can provide information as to how the parameters can and will be met, it is inappropriate for the parameters themselves to be left to the management plan.
    2. The consent (through conditions) must set the maximum leaching allowed on the face of the consent document - it is inappropriate to leave that matter to a management plan. The maximum nitrogen leaching (over time) is a fundamental parameter and as such it should be imposed on the face of the consent, and not left to a management plan.
    3. It is acceptable for a management plan to be used to set out how the maximum leaching allowance is to be achieved, but if this approach is taken the management plan used should be that provided for in the One Plan in the definition of the Nutrient Management Plan.
  1. The Court also considered that the wording of either the conditions or any advice note should not imply that the nitrogen leaching limit could be updated for any purpose and by an undefined methodology. This would result in leaving a key decision to a later date and allow for the delegation of the Council's decision making powers (offending against the legal principles for valid consent conditions). The Court noted that updating the leaching limits on an ad hoc basis under individual consents may have significant implications, across a catchment, in terms of the cumulative effects on water quality and allocation between consent holders.

Appendix A

Declarations made by the Environment Court

  1. That to have regard to any purported fettering of the council's ability to freely consider the objectives, policies, rules and other requirements of any planning document set out in s104(1)(b) of the Act; or of the council's ability to decline an application for resource consent and to freely consider the appropriate duration and conditions of a consent, would be unlawful.
  2. That in considering applications for resource consents for restricted discretionary activities under Rules 14-2 and 14-4 of the One Plan (existing and future intensive land use activities), pursuant to sections 104 and 104C of the Act, the Council has a duty to have regard to each of the following matters:
    1. all the matters over which discretion is restricted under Rules 14-2 and 14-4, including:
      1. the extent of non-compliance with the cumulative nitrogen leaching maximum values set out in Table 14.2; and
      2. the environmental effects of that non-compliance including cumulative effects and a consideration of the required reductions of nitrogen in the relevant water management zone or subzone in order to provide for the Schedule B values (for zones or subzones that are over-allocated).
    1. the objectives and policies of the One Plan in so far as they relate to matters over which discretion is restricted under Rules 14-2 and 14-4.
    2. the objectives and policies of the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2014 (NPSFM) in so far as they relate to matters over which discretion is restricted under Rules 14-2 and 14-4.
    3. in relation to the discharge consent required under section 15 of the Act and under Rules 14-2 and 14-4:
      1. the nature of the discharge and the sensitivity of the receiving environment under section 105 of the Act; and
      2. the requirements of section 107 of the Act.
  1. That in considering and granting applications for resource consents under Rules 14-1 to 14-4 of the One Plan, the Council must not grant consents contrary to the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water) Regulations 2007.
  2. That, when considering and granting resource consents under Rules 14-2 and 14-4 of the One Plan, the Council has a duty to give reasons for its decisions including reasons that address the matters in Policy 14-6(a) - (c) of the One Plan and Declarations 2(a)(i) and 2(a)(ii).
  3. In accordance with section 88 and the Fourth Schedule of the Act, and the Resource Management (Forms, Fees, and Procedure) Regulations 2003, applications for resource consent under Rules 14-2 and 14-4 of the One Plan, must include:
    1. An application form complying with Form 9 of the Resource Management Act (Forms, Fees and Procedure) Regulations 2003;
    2. Application for all discharges associated with the intensive land use activity;
    3. Assessment of compliance against the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Sources of Human Drinking Water) Regulations 2007;
    4. An AEE that meets the requirements of Schedule 4 of the RMA;
    5. An AEE that assesses the activity against the relevant Objectives and Policies of the One Plan for existing intensive land uses if there is non-compliance with the requirements of Table 14.2 of the One Plan - that is to include assessment against Policy 14- 6(b) and (c).
    6. Assessment against the provisions of s105 RMA, to the extent they relate to the matters over which discretion is restricted.
  1. That, in granting resource consents under Rules 14.2 and 14.4 of the One Plan the Council must adequately define the ambit and scope of the activity authorised, including through consents and consent conditions that:
    1. expressly authorise the activity of the associated discharge of contaminants to land in circumstances where those contaminants may enter water, as well as the use of land for intensive farming, for activities expressly requiring consent under Rules 14-2 and 14-4;
    2. set the maximum nitrogen leaching allowed over the term of the consents;
    3. require the activity to be operated in compliance with a Nutrient Management Plan to be prepared by a person who has both a Certificate of Completion in Sustainable Nutrient Management in NZ Agriculture and a Certificate of Completion in Advanced Sustainable Nutrient Management from Massey University, showing that the activity is complying with the nitrogen leaching maximums allowed by the consent; and
    4. require environmental or performance standards for phosphorus or sediment loss, or for the matters listed in Rules 14-5, 14-6, 14-7, 14-9 and 14-11 of the One Plan where they are applicable.
  1. That Conditions or Advice Notes stating, or to the effect, that:
    1. it is not intended that there will be enforcement of any specific management practices;
    2. "updates" to targeted nitrogen leaching or a Sustainable Management Plan or associated OVERSEER files may be approved by the Regulatory Manager from time to time; and
    3. annual records showing compliance with Nutrient Management Plans will only be required if there are "discrepancies with the Nutrient Budget"

are unlawful, invalid and in contravention of the Act.


1Wynn Williams acted as instructing solicitors for DairyNZ Ltd in respect of this decision.
2 Environmental Defence Society v NZ King Salmon Ltd [2014] NZSC 38, [2014] 1 NZLR 593, as applied in R J Davidson Family Trust v Marlborough District Council [2017] NZHC 52. Following King Salmon, there is only a need to separately refer back to Part 2 when assessing an application for resource consent, where there is an allegation of invalidity, incomplete coverage, or uncertainty of meaning in the higher order documents.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions