ARTICLE
31 January 2025

RD Nordic-Baltic, January 21, 2025, Procedural Order On Costs For Access To Pleadings And Evidence, UPC_CFI_380/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
A member of the public does not bear the costs of a request for access to written pleadings and evidence...
Germany Intellectual Property

Key takeaway

A member of the public does not bear the costs of a request for access to written pleadings and evidence

There is no legal basis for ordering a member of the public, who has made a request for access to written pleadings and evidence, to reimburse legal costs incurred by the parties to the relevant proceddings when they are consulted by the judge-rapporteur in accordance with Rule 262.1(b) RoP. Article 69 UPCA does not apply in this situation. Therefore, such requests for reimbursement of costs shall be dismissed.

Division

RD Nordic-Baltic

UPC number

UPC_CFI_380/2023

Type of proceedings

Infringement action

Parties

Applicant: name redacted

Parties to the relevant proceedings:
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
Meril Life Sciences PVT Limited
Meril GmbH
SMIS International OÜ
Sormedica, UAB
Interlux, UAB
VAB-Logistik, UAB

Patent(s)

EP 3 769 722

Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 262.1(b) RoP, Rule 265 RoP, Article 69 UPCA

2025-01-21_RD_Nordic-Baltic_UPC_CFI_380-2023

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More