ARTICLE
12 February 2025

Court Of Appeal Sends Expensive Message To Employer For Termination Post-Medical Leave

G
Goulart

Contributor

We are employment lawyers with the experience, insight, wisdom, commitment, and street smarts to make a difference in your workplace. Born out of the sea of change brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, our employment lawyers understand the need for creativity and agility. We consider ourselves among the best workplace lawyers, and best employment law firms. While there are legions of employment lawyers out there, you gain from the diversity of experience of our team, and our ability to understand and address your issues within a broader practical and business context. That is the Goulart Advantage.

The recent decision of Krmpotic v. Thunder Bay Electronics Limited, 2024 ONCA 332, involves an employee with 30 years of service that was terminated the day he returned from a medical leave following back surgery.
Canada Ontario Employment and HR

The recent decision of Krmpotic v. Thunder Bay Electronics Limited, 2024 ONCA 332, involves an employee with 30 years of service that was terminated the day he returned from a medical leave following back surgery.

Trial Decision

The trial judge awarded the employee a 24 month notice period and made a finding that the employee was medically incapable of mitigating his damages during the notice period. The trial judge also awarded the employee $50,000 in aggravated damages because the employer had terminated the employee in a manner that breached its duty of good faith and to operate in a reasonable, honest and candid manner.

Court of Appeal Decision

The employer appealed the finding with respect to the employee's inability to mitigate as the employee had presented no expert medical evidence to prove that he was unable to work. Instead, the employee relied on testimony from himself and family members to establish that his physical condition precluded him from performing the physical requirements of his occupation. The employer also appealed the award of aggravated damages as the employee provided no medical evidence to establish that the manner of termination caused significant mental distress. The employer argued that there was no evidence that the employee suffered mental distress beyond the normal hurt expected from being terminated.

The Ontario Court of Appeal rejected both of the employer's arguments. The Court held that there was no requirement to establish physical incapacity only by expert medical evidence. The Court found that it was reasonable for the trial judge to rely on the evidence presented during the trial to conclude that the employee was physically unable to mitigate. The Court also rejected the employer's arguments with respect to aggravated damages. The Court held that insensitive conduct in the manner of dismissal is a breach of the duty of good faith which can warrant aggravated damages.

Takeaways

This decision highlights the risks that an employer can face when terminating an employee immediately upon their return from a medical leave. Not only can an employer face additional human rights or aggravated damages, but the employee may also be able to circumvent the duty to mitigate based on their own evidence that they are physically incapable of mitigating during the reasonable notice period.

Originally published Jul 10

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More