Florida Supreme Court Bars Nonmonetary Terms In Proposals For Settlement

LB
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Contributor

Founded in 1979 by seven lawyers from a premier Los Angeles firm, Lewis Brisbois has grown to include nearly 1,400 attorneys in 50 offices in 27 states, and dedicates itself to more than 40 legal practice areas for clients of all sizes in every major industry.
Effective July 1, 2022, the Florida Supreme Court has amended Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442—governing procedural requirements for service of proposals for settlement...
United States Florida Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Miami, Fla. (May 26, 2022) -  Effective July 1, 2022, the Florida Supreme Court has amended Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442—governing procedural requirements for service of proposals for settlement—to preclude service of a proposal containing "nonmonetary terms, with the exceptions of a voluntary dismissal of all claims with prejudice and any other nonmonetary terms permitted by statute." The court's amendment comes on the court's own motion and after a lengthy comment period and oral argument. The  Court's Opinion explains that the amendments are intended to "align rule 1.442 with the substantive elements of Florida's settlement proposal statutes," including section 768.79, Florida Statutes.

As a result of the amendments, parties will no longer be permitted to attach releases to their proposals for settlement. Instead, parties will be confined to accepting a "voluntary dismissal" of the litigation as part of a proposal for settlement. The only exceptions are circumstances where nonmonetary terms are "permitted by statute." Note that nothing in the Florida Supreme Court's amendments precludes resolution of litigation through traditional means of settlement.

The purposes of Florida's proposal for settlement laws (primarily Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79, Florida Statutes) is to encourage settlement and promote efficient resolution of litigation. Despite this, Florida's proposal for settlement laws have become a hot bed for litigation, with an ever-evolving body of case precedent. While the Florida Supreme Court's amendments will cut back on litigation relating to ambiguity in proposals for settlement, multiple variables must still be considered when determining whether to serve or accept a proposal for settlement, and a variety of choices must be made when drafting a proposal for settlement. These decisions affect the ability of a party to strategically engage in settlement of the case, shift the burden of attorneys' fees to another party, and safeguard entitlement to attorneys' fees in the event settlement results in an impasse.

The Florida Supreme Court's Opinion and the text of amended rule 1.442 can be found  here. The amendments will become effective July 1, 2022, at 12:01 a.m.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More