ARTICLE
1 April 2024

LD Düsseldorf, February 23, 2024, Procedural Order, UPC_CFI_463/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Postponement of the start of a deadline until conclusion of secrecy protection proceedings according to R. 262A RoP is not compatible with the urgent...
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Postponement of the start of a deadline until conclusion of secrecy protection proceedings according to R. 262A RoP is not compatible with the urgent nature of proceedings for provisional measures

As made clear in procedural order ORD_8568/2024, none of the deadlines in such proceedings for provisional measures can be extended in view of the timely date of the oral hearing.

2.Division

LD Düsseldorf

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_463/2023

4. Type of proceedings

Application for provisional measures

5. Parties

Applicant: 10x Genomics, Inc.

Respondent: Curio Bioscience Inc.

6. Patent(s)

EP 2 697 391 B1

7. Jurisdictions

Place jurisdictions

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 9.3(a) RoP

To view the full article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More