ARTICLE
29 August 2024

Japanese Government Published Checklist And Guidance Related To AI And Copyrights

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
On 31 July 2024, the Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan (the Agency) published "Checklist and Guidance related to AI and Copyrights" (the Checklist)...
Japan Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 31 July 2024, the Agency for Cultural Affairs, Government of Japan (the Agency) published "Checklist and Guidance related to AI and Copyrights" (the Checklist), suggesting some ideas to resolve unsettled issues related to "Do inputs to AI infringe copyrights?" (see our previous blog "Japanese Government Identified Issues Related to AI and Copyrights") for AI developers as described below:

  • When would use of copyrighted works be considered to be done for purposes more than information analysis purposes?

    The following are examples of such cases due to additional purposes to enjoy thoughts or feelings represented on the works:
    • Intentional over-learning.
    • Creation of database containing existing copyrighted works for AI learning purposes to output creative representations of the works through RAG.
    • Additional learning of only a few works of specific creators through LoRA to output creative representations of the works.
  • What cases would be considered to "unreasonably harm creators' interests"?

    Unauthorized use of copyrighted database for AI learning purposes when such database is sold for a fee as an AI learning dataset should be considered so.

The Checklist also shows suggestions for other stakeholders (AI providers and users) to minimize risks related to their own activities on generative AI with use of copyrighted works. The Checklist does not aim to establish any mandatory obligations of, or safe harbor rules for, the stakeholders, but it would be worth following to mitigate risks related to the development and use of AI.

The Checklist further provides guidance to creators of copyrighted works on how to protect and enforce their rights on the works against infringement by those AI developers, providers and users. The guidance would be a good source for a creator to get a basic understanding of applicable safeguards and countermeasures to protect its rights on the works.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More