ARTICLE
29 April 2023

The offence of intentional foreign interference

CD
Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia

Contributor

With decades of experience, Criminal Defence Lawyers Australia® are exclusively amongst the top criminal lawyers in Australia holding an exceptional track record of successfully getting charges dropped early, securing section 10 non convictions, and ‘Not Guilty’ verdicts across all Local, District and Supreme Courts in Australia. As an award-winning criminal lawyers Sydney led team, we’re focused on results by providing a highly personalised service backed with a proven track record of success. Our awards, online reviews and recognition over the years, including TV, radio and newspaper appearances for our expert legal insight in criminal law makes us leading Sydney based criminal lawyers. 8 Convenient Offices Across NSW including Sydney CBD, Parramatta, Blacktown, Liverpool, Penrith, Newcastle, Wollongong and Bankstown.
Espionage and foreign interference pose a threat to sovereignty, security and integrity of our national institutions.
Australia Government, Public Sector
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Australian Federal Police have charged a 55-year-old man from NSW with foreign interference after he allegedly sold information regarding Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements to individuals working for a foreign intelligence service.

The arrest comes after investigation by a Counter Foreign Interference Taskforce initiated by ASIO.

The Australian national operates a business overseas and is reported to normally reside overseas.

He returned to Australia recently and was arrested at his Bondi residence on 14 April 2023.

He was subsequently charged with one count of reckless foreign interference, in contravention of section 92.3 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).

The police will allege that the 55-year-old man was contacted by another man, who claimed to be from a ‘think tank' seeking for the businessman to meet his representatives.

A think tank is essentially a body involved in policy work and producing research publications.

It is alleged that the man's representatives, referred to as ‘Ken' and ‘Evelyn' by the AFP, met with the 55-year-old on numerous occasions.

During these meetings, ‘Ken' and ‘Evelyn' allegedly offered the man money to obtain the information regarding Australian defence, economic and national security arrangements, as well as matters relating to other countries.

The police will allege that these requests were complied with, with a number of reports obtained and the 55-year-old receiving payment.

The parties referred to as ‘Ken' and ‘Evelyn' are alleged to work for a foreign intelligence service currently undertaking intelligence collection activities, which has possibly led them to contacting other Australian citizens and residents.

In their statement, the AFP noted that: “espionage and foreign interference pose a serious threat to Australia's sovereignty, security and integrity of our national institutions.”

The 55-year-old will be the second person charged by the Taskforce since the introduction of the National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill in 2018.

The National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Bill amended the Criminal Code Act 1995(Cth) to introduce offences related to treason, espionage, foreign interference, and interfering with political rights and duties, among others.

It essentially seeks to target to activities of foreign actors and those who act or seek to act on their behalf, where this works against Australia's interests.

Division 92 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) addresses foreign interference.

Section 92.2 criminalises the offence of intentional foreign interference, which a person will commit if they commit conduct, which is engaged on behalf of, or in collaboration with, a foreign principal or directed, funded, or supervised by a foreign principal, including a person acting on their behalf.

In order for the offence to be committed, the person will intend for the conduct to:

  • influence a political or governmental process of the Commonwealth or a State or Territory,
  • influence the exercise (whether or not in Australia) of an Australian democratic or political right or duty,
  • support intelligence activities of a foreign principal, or
  • prejudice Australia's national security.

It is also a requirement for it to be covert or involve deception, or involve the person making a threat to cause serious harm or making a demand with menaces.

The maximum penalty applicable is 20 years imprisonment.

Section 92.3 criminalises the same conduct, however, applies to circumstances in which the defendant is instead ‘reckless' as to whether the conduct will influence, support, or prejudice the aforementioned factors. The maximum penalty applicable is instead 15 years imprisonment.

The Act also addresses those who participate in conduct with the intention of preparing for, or planning, an offence against sections 92.2 or 92.3, and prescribes a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, as per section 92.4.

It is a defence to the charges if the conduct was done in accordance with: a law of the Commonwealth, an arrangement or agreement to which the Commonwealth is party, or in a person's capacity as a public official.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More