Switzerland: Challenge Against CAS Award Dismissed Despite Sole Arbitrator Admitting To Mistakes In Factual Findings (Swiss Supreme Court)

Last Updated: 14 September 2018
Article by Christopher Boog and Damien Clivaz

In decision 4A_578/2017, the Swiss Supreme Court dismissed a request by a Romanian football player to set aside an award issued by the Court of Arbitration for Sport based on the argument that his right to be heard was violated.


In a French-Language decision, the Swiss Supreme Court rejected a challenge to set aside a Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) award for an alleged violation of the right to be heard.

Although the CAS sole arbitrator admitted to having made a clear mistake in the factual findings of the award, the court dismissed the request to set aside the award. It held that, although the right to be heard is a formal procedural right, the petitioner must be able to demonstrate that the violation of the right to be heard had a material impact on the outcome of the case. (Decision 4A_578/2017 (20 July 2018).)


Article 190(2)(b) of the Private International Law Act (PILA) provides that an award will be set aside if the principle of equal treatment of the parties or the right of the parties to be heard was violated.


In 2015, a Romanian footballer (Player) signed an employment contract with an Israeli football club (Club). The contract was governed by FIFA's Regulations on the Status and Transfer of Players (RSTP) and provided for an annual salary and various bonuses.

Over the following year, the Club only partially met its obligation to pay the Player's salary and bonuses. On 1 November 2016, and following various attempts to amicably settle the Player's outstanding payment claims, the Player's counsel sent a letter of formal notice to the Club requesting that it pay the balance of EUR 86,000 owed to the Player within seven days. The notice further stated that the contract would be immediately terminated for cause if no payment was received within the given deadline.

By fax of 9 November 2016, the Club replied that it had informed the Player both orally and by text message that a cheque corresponding to the outstanding balance had been available for pick up since 8 November 2016.

Five hours later, the Club sent a further letter by fax to the Player's counsel explaining that the Player had refused to collect the cheque and that it would, therefore, deposit the amount directly into the Player's bank account the next morning. Furthermore, the Club explained that it had complied with the deadline for payment set by the Player's counsel since the cheque was ready for pick up on 8 November 2016. In support of its allegation, the Club attached a copy of the cheque to its letter.

On the evening of the same day, the Club received a "Declaration of Termination with just cause" in which the Player declared that no payment had been received within the set deadline, and that he therefore terminated the contract and intended to claim penalties for late payment.

The following morning, the Player's bank account was credited with four payments by the Club, totalling EUR 140,119. Soon afterwards, the Player returned to Romania and did not attend subsequent team practice sessions.

The Player subsequently filed a request for arbitration with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) requesting that:

  • The validity of the termination be confirmed.
  • The Club be ordered to pay penalties for late payment in the amount of EUR 18,600.
  • The Club be ordered to pay damages for breach of the employment contract in the amount of EUR 800,000.

In its reply, the Club made two counterclaims requesting that:

  • The Player be ordered to reimburse the EUR 54,119 corresponding to the difference between what the Player was owed and what was credited to his account by the Club on 10 November 2016.
  • The Player be ordered to pay damages in the amount of EUR 620,000 corresponding to the transfer amount the Club had paid to acquire the Player.

Following a hearing, the Club agreed to withdraw its counterclaims. According to the Player, the parties also agreed on that occasion that the cheque that was copied in the Club's second fax of 8 November 2016 was for the amount of EUR 66,941, which was less than the amount that was due to the Player at the time.

The sole arbitrator rendered his award on 11 September 2017. He partially admitted the Player's claims and ordered the Club to pay the penalties for late payment. However, he rejected both the Player's claims regarding the validity of the termination and the alleged breach of the employment contract.

In the factual findings of the award, the sole arbitrator held that on 8 November 2016, the Club had sent proof that a cheque for the amount of EUR 86,000 had been "ready for the Player and that the latter had failed to collect the same". Furthermore, the arbitrator found that on 10 November 2016, the check had been deposited by the Club into the Player's bank account.

In the legal analysis, the arbitrator came to the conclusion that in the circumstances of the case, the Club's two-day delay in effecting payment did not justify a termination for cause. The arbitrator found that the Player had, in fact, acted in bad faith when he refused to accept the cheque and terminated the contract.

The Player challenged the award before the Swiss Supreme Court, arguing that his right to be heard, enshrined in Article 190(2)(d) of the PILA, had been violated because the sole arbitrator had not examined the arguments that the Player had put forward.

In support of his allegations, the Player argued that the sole arbitrator had made two errors in the factual findings of the award: he erroneously reported the amount of the cheque copied by the Club in its fax of 8 November 2016 and wrongly held that the Club had deposited the cheque into the Player's account the next day, when in fact the Club had made four bank transfers to the Player's account.

The Player further argued that these mistakes had a direct impact on the outcome of the case because the sole arbitrator mistakenly considered that the payment was ready on 8 November 2016 and that the Player had refused to accept the cheque when in fact the cheque issued by the Club was not equivalent to the outstanding balance.

Both the Club and the CAS filed replies to the challenge before the Swiss Supreme Court.

In a statement provided to the Swiss Supreme Court, the sole arbitrator acknowledged that he had made mistakes in his factual findings, partly attributing them to a "typographical error". However, the sole arbitrator argued that the amount of the cheque had not influenced his decision that the Player had acted in bad faith. Rather, the sole arbitrator held that the Player had acted in bad faith by refusing to pick up the cheque, terminating the contract just two days after the deadline set for payment and leaving Israel immediately afterwards.


The Swiss Supreme Court rejected the challenge, dismissing the alleged violation of the right to be heard invoked by the Player.

By way of a preliminary comment, the Swiss Supreme Court restated its well-established case law that the parties' right to be heard under Article 190(2)(d) PILA imposes on tribunals a minimum duty to examine and address all relevant issues that are material to the outcome of the case.

The Swiss Supreme Court further confirmed that, although the right to be heard is a formal procedural right, it is not an end in itself. If a violation of the right to be heard had no material impact on the outcome of the case, the challenged decision should not be annulled.

In the court's view, the petitioner in this case had not specifically argued that the amount of the cheque or the bank transfers made to the Player's account had been material to the outcome of the case. In this regard, the Supreme Court noted that the Player's submissions in the underlying arbitration did not even mention the bank transfers and the cheque, let alone its amount.

Accordingly, the Swiss Supreme Court held that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate how he was prevented from pleading his case during the arbitration proceedings notwithstanding the sole arbitrator's wrong factual findings and dismissed the challenge.


In this decision, the Swiss Supreme Court confirmed that the right to be heard is not a purely formal right with respect to the appreciation of evidence by the tribunal. Rather, a potential (formal) violation of the right to be heard will remain without consequence if it has no potential influence on the tribunal's decision.

What is particularly noteworthy in the present case is that the sole arbitrator expressly admitted to making a mistake in the factual findings of the award. The court held that even in case of such an express admission of a mistake, the petitioner must demonstrate that this mistake had a material impact on the outcome of the case, regardless of the formal nature of the right to be heard.


Decision 4A_578/2017 (20 July 2018).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions