Worldwide: India Arbitration Update

As both government and business in India continue to encourage Japanese investors to participate in the country's growth story, this newsletter contains a high-level update regarding various arbitration related developments.

For clients currently engaged, or looking to do business, in India, there are complex legal and regulatory frameworks, dispute resolution and management considerations. This month's newsletter will cover the following topics:

  • Courts' refusal to intervene in ongoing or potential foreign-seated arbitrations;
  • Award enforcement challenges faced by foreign counterparties;
  • India's re-negotiation of its Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs); and
  • The launch of the Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA).

Courts' refusal to intervene in arbitrations

Challenges to enforcement of foreign awards in Indian courts

India initiates re-negotiation of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) based on Model BIT

India's first centre for international arbitration launched in Mumbai


Courts' refusal to intervene in arbitrations

Over the last few years, the Indian judiciary has shown a reluctance to intervene in situations where the parties have agreed on foreign-seated arbitrations applying foreign arbitral procedural law. This trend is an encouraging one for foreign counterparties, given the real concern that Indian courts were quick to exercise supervisory jurisdiction over foreign-seated arbitrations, simply because one of the counterparties was Indian or the substantive contractual agreement was governed by Indian law.1

The trend towards a more arbitration-friendly India began with the September 2012 decision in BALCO/Kaiser Aluminium ("BALCO I")2 and can be further illustrated by the following:

  • In 2015, a division bench of the Delhi High Court overruled a single judge of the same court and refused to grant an anti-arbitration injunction to the local partner of McDonald's, Mr. Vikram Bakshi. Mr. Bakshi was seeking to halt the proceedings of a London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) arbitration initiated by McDonald's in connection with a dispute concerning its right to acquire Mr. Bakshi's share in the joint venture. Notably, the division bench clarified that Mr. Bakshi's argument of London being a forum non conveniens (on the basis that the dispute involved Indian parties and that Indian law governed the joint venture agreement) would not hold good. The Supreme Court has since upheld this judgment.3
  • In Eitzen Bulk4, the Supreme Court upheld the proposition that choosing a juridical seat of arbitration in a particular country has the effect of choosing that country's law as applicable to the proceedings, such that an express choice would not be necessary. The contract contained an arbitration clause providing for arbitration in London and English law to apply. The Court therefore concluded that that where parties choose a seat of arbitration outside India with the substantive dispute to be governed by the law of a foreign country, a party may not be able to have the award set aside under the Indian arbitration law.
  • In Videocon Industries5 and Cairn India Limited6, the division bench of the Delhi High Court set aside two anti-arbitration injunctions granted by lower Indian courts for arbitrations seated in Kuala Lumpur. The dispute was in relation to a Production Sharing Contract, which contained a clause providing that the governing law was Indian law and the law of the arbitration agreement was English law. The bench stated that the Indian courts did not have inherent jurisdiction to entertain the injunctions simply on the basis that the substantive law of the contract was Indian law.

Challenges to enforcement of foreign awards in Indian courts

While the reluctance of courts to intervene in ongoing or potential offshore arbitrations will lend a significant degree of comfort to investors, concerns remain around the enforcement of arbitral awards in the Indian courts.

India is a signatory to the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the "New York Convention"), and its arbitration law provides for enforcement of awards from other New York Convention countries. However, the Indian arbitration law provides for a number of grounds under which parties may oppose an application for enforcement of a foreign award, the most contentious of which has been the "public policy" provision.

The Indian courts have adopted a broad interpretation of this exception, including if it is contrary to: (a) fundamental policy of Indian law; or (b) the interest of India; or (c) justice or morality, or (d) in addition, if it is patently illegal.7 Furthermore, as part of this enforcement process, Indian courts have been known to investigate the merits of the case.

Recognising this as a problem, in 2015, the Indian Arbitration Act was amended to reflect the fact that the "patent illegality" test would not be applicable to awards arising from international commercial arbitrations. The amendment also clarified that "the test as to whether there is a contravention with the fundamental policy of Indian law shall not entail a review on the merits of the dispute."

Meanwhile, however, counterparties continue to rely on grounds in the Indian arbitration law to challenge foreign awards. Recent reports indicate that an Indian party has challenged a Japanese company's application to enforce an LCIA award in courts in London and Delhi on grounds of, inter alia, the award being against the law and policy of India.8 It remains to be seen whether the amended "public policy" provisions will be tested in the courts, and foreign investors will undoubtedly be keeping a close eye on developments.

India initiates re-negotiation of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) based on Model BIT

In the background of an increasing number of Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) based challenges by foreign investors, the Government of India has started re-negotiations with a number of partner countries.

The re-negotiations are based on the Model BIT which was approved by the Cabinet late last year. Overall, the changes are expected to make it harder for foreign investors to bring claims against the government for policy decisions that have a negative commercial impact on foreign investments. It has been reported that India's major global partners have shown resistance to some of the proposed provisions of the new-look BIT, including the requirement for investors to exhaust local redressal remedies before resorting to arbitration. The absence from the Model BIT of traditionally understood concepts of "fair and equitable treatment" and "most favoured nation" has also been reported to be a cause for concern.9

India's first centre for international arbitration launched in Mumbai

The Mumbai Centre for International Arbitration (MCIA), an independent arbitral institution aiming to be India's premier forum for commercial dispute resolution, was launched on 8 October 2016.

In the inaugural address, Chief Minister of Maharashtra province (of which Mumbai is the capital), Mr. Devendra Fadnavis noted that 30% of the cases in each of the LCIA and the Singapore International Arbitration Centre involved Indian businesses. It was announced that the Maharashtra Government will be requesting state-owned companies and entities to have an inbuilt clause in their contracts worth more than Rs.5 crore (approximately USD 750,000/JPY 78 million) that makes it mandatory to take their arbitration cases to MCIA.. 10 A copy of the MCIA Rules can be found here.

The MCIA is governed by a 17-member Council, which includes Herbert Smith Freehills London partner Nicholas Peacock, the head of the firm's India arbitration practice.


 1 Bhatia International vs. Bulk Trading S.A.,(2002) 4 SCC 105

2 In BALCO I, the Supreme Court overruled Bhatia International and held that Part I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 – which confers courts with the powers to grant interim relief and set aside arbitral awards – only applies to arbitrations seated in India. Awards arising out of foreign seated arbitrations are subject to the jurisdiction of the Indian courts only when they are sought to be enforced in India under Part II of the Act. Bharat Aluminium Co vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services, (2012) 9 SCC 552


4 Eitzen Bulk A/S and others vs. Ashapura Minechem Limited and others, Case numbers 5131-5133 of 2016, Supreme Court of India.

5 Videocon Industries Limited vs. Union of India; FAO 450/2015.

6 Cairn India Limited and others vs. Union of India, FAO (OS) 519/2015.

7 ONGC Limited vs. Saw Pipes Limited, (2003) 5 SCC 705




The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Practice Guides
by Mondaq Advice Centres
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions