European Union: The Likelihood Of Confusion In The European Union Trade Mark Opposition Procedure – Part I

The European Union ('EU') has attempted to establish a unitary regime to provide for a single filing system for trade mark registration through the inception of the Community Trade Mark Regulation ('CTMR')1, which due to recent amendments, has now been renamed the European Trade Mark Regulation ('EUTMR'). The term 'Community Trade Mark' ('CTM'), now 'European Trade Mark' ('EUTM'), under the said Regulation, includes any mark which consists of different words, shapes, designs and graphics which together can differentiate between goods or services of one enterprise from another. Moreover, the EUTMR provides owners of earlier trade mark rights the opportunity to oppose registration regarding any mark which is identical, similar or creates confusion with their earlier mark and the goods or services it assimilates with.

The opposition procedure under Article 8 of the EUTMR sets out relative grounds upon which oppositions can be based on, always initiated as inter partes proceedings, based on the likelihood of conflict with an earlier mark. Cases of oppositions may vary from absolute identity between goods, services or marks, in which case there is a presumption of 'likelihood of confusion', due to the marks being evidently identical, to a situation of mere similarity where the 'likelihood of confusion' is not presumed but is required to be proven.  These cases are examined thoroughly by the Opposition Division of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), which was previously called the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM).

The notion of 'likelihood of confusion' is very important to any opposition procedure. The creation of public confusion is essential to the objection, along with a number of other important issues which need to be addressed when assessing similarity between goods, services or marks respectively.

The EUTMR does not specifically define the said notion, thus, the precise meaning of 'likelihood of confusion' has been the debate of many authors and cases for years. Today, the public as well as the EUIPO have settled on case law and follow the trend whereby 'likelihood of confusion' fundamentally refers to two particular situations in which:

"1. The public confuses the conflicting trade mark that is to say, mistakes the one for the other;

2. The public makes a connection between the conflicting trade marks and assumes that the goods/ services in question are from the same or economically-linked undertakings (likelihood of association)"2

Keeping this in mind, it is important to understand that to establish whether 'likelihood of confusion' actually exists, an overall assessment of several factors has to take place. Moreover, one can ask, to what extent should registrations be rejected or accepted upon proof of 'likelihood of confusion' and how far should one go when analysing the said notion? This is again a matter of interpretation of the Courts as well as legal authors.

The factors which contribute to the overall assessment of 'likelihood of confusion' should be assessed while keeping the following in mind:

  1. Whether there is a threshold requirement that the goods or services and the signs be 'similar';
  2. The factors to assess similarity of both goods or services and signs;
  3. The nature of the relevant confusion and the overall assessment.

Further assessment of the above mentioned factors is a topic which can be discussed separately, however, for purposes of this piece, reference will be made to factors established by case law developed over the years, in particular through the case of Sabel vs Puma.3

The Sabel vs Puma case, decided back in 1997, has proved to be crucial in helping parties understand how 'likelihood of confusion' is examined, as it established a number of fundamental propositions which helped in understanding what 'identical marks' are, and how to assess, in a number of stages, the notion of 'likelihood of confusion'.

Generally, the assessment of 'likelihood of confusion' involves several factors, the most important of which being:

  • Similarity between goods or services.
  • Similarity between marks.
  • Dominant character of the marks.
  • Distinctiveness of the mark.
  • The relevant public.
  • Global Assessment.

The fact that no specific factors are precisely stated in the EUTMR, nor are any factors stated by the EUIPO, the EUIPO itself bases its opposition decisions on factors created through case law. This shows the importance of the above stated factors, particularly, the similarity between goods and services and the similarity between marks, which factors shall be assessed in this piece and subsequently in Part II of the same.

The degree of similarity between goods or services in opposition proceedings is of great importance and must be taken into account when considering 'likelihood of confusion'.  One might ask, is there a threshold to the goods or services being considered similar for purposes of Article 8(1) (b)4? Through examining and assessing a number of cases, the courts seemed to have considered that such threshold actually exists, in that the question of similarity must in itself be assessed as a whole.

The Court confirmed this position in 2014 when in Vedal vs OHIM it stated that;

"For the purposes of applying Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation No.40/40., the likelihood of confusion presupposes both that the mark applied for and the earlier trade mark are identical or similar, and that the goods or services covered by the application for registration are identical or similar to those in respect of which the earlier mark is registered. Those conditions are cumulative."5

Moreover, in Canon vs MGM6 the Court went a step further in emphasising that all factors relating to the goods or services themselves must be taken into account. The Court established these factors to be the below;

  1. Nature – refers to the essential quality or characteristic of the said good or service. The nature is ultimately what the good or service is; for example: 'Foundation is a cosmetic'.
  2. Intended purpose – is generally defined as "the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists"7. This ultimately means the intended use of the goods or services and not any diverted use.
  3. Method of use - defines how goods achieve their purpose.
  4. Complementarity – relates to those goods which "are closely connected in the sense that one is essential or significant for using the other so that consumers may think that the same company is responsible for manufacturing those goods".8
  5. In competition - when there is direct competition between goods or services, and one can substitute the other, they are said to be in competition.

Moreover, while the aforementioned factors (the 'Canon Factors') are still greatly relied upon by the EUIPO and the courts, in its guidelines the EUIPO has taken three additional factors into consideration9:

  1. The distribution channels - if the goods or services in question make use of the same distribution channel, it would be more probable for consumers to 'presume' that the goods or services in question derive through the same market.
  2. The relevant public - the perception of the relevant public, comprising actual or potential customers, is of great importance. This relevant public may consist of the public at large and also business customers.
  3. The usual origin (producer/provider) – The usual origin of goods or services is considered as an indication of high similarity when according to the public the goods or services have the same usual origin.

In conclusion, one should keep in mind that while the Canon Factors were originally considered individually by courts for establishing whether likelihood of confusion subsists, today this is not the case. To the contrary, seeing as some criteria are interrelated while other criteria might be more important than others, all factors should be assessed as one. Moreover, to truly examine and establish 'likelihood of confusion' one must also assess the similarity between marks, which notion will be duly assessed and examined in Part II of this piece which shall be published subsequently.


1 Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community Trade Mark

2 'Guidelines for Examination of European Trade Marks' Part C, Opposition, Section 2,

Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 1, Sub section 3.1, Page 5 [Version 1.0, 01.02.2017]

3 Case C-251/95 Sabel vs Puma [11/11/1997] European Court of Justice

4 Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the European Union Trade Mark, Article 8 (1) (b) "if because of its identity with, or similarity to, the earlier trade mark and the identity or similarity of the goods or services covered by the trade marks there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public in the territory in which the earlier trade mark is protected; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the earlier trade mark"

5 Case C-106/03 Vedial vs OHIM [12/10/2004] European Court of Justice , para.23

6 Case C-39/97 Canon vs MGM [29/09/1998] European Court of Justice

7 Oxford English Dictionary definition

8 Case T-74/10 Flaco-Geräte GmbH vs OHIM [22/09/2011] General Court, para.40

9 'Guidelines for Examination of European Trade Marks' Part C, Opposition, Section 2, Double Identity and Likelihood of Confusion, Chapter 2, Sub section 3.2, Pages 31-35 [Version 1.0, 01//02/2017]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions