Japan:
訴訟・仲裁のいずれを選択すべきかの実務上の判断ポイント
23 November 2015
Jones Day
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
紛争解決手続選択の思考過程―訴訟・仲裁のいずれを選択すべきかの実務上の判断ポイント― (『New Business Law』No.1062)
棚澤高志弁護士と花田裕介弁護士の論稿、「紛争解決手続選択の思考過程―訴訟・仲裁のいずれを選択すべきかの実務上の判断ポイント―第4回仲裁手続きの選択、シンガポール国際商事裁判所」が『New
Business Law』(No.1062,
2015年11月15日商事法務)の連載として掲載されました。
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration from Japan
Should Courts Modify An Arbitral Award?
ZBA
One of the long-standing issues concerns the power of courts to modify an award in proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act") dealing with applications for setting aside an arbitral award.
Autonomy Of Arbitral Tribunals And Admissibility Of Documents
Mandala Law Offices
When a review petition is dismissed by the highest court of the land – the Supreme Court, all does not come to an end. The Supreme Court in true exercise of its supreme powers grants one last constitutional remedy – the curative petition.