European Union: Advocate General Declares US Safe Harbour "Invalid"

Last Updated: 20 October 2015
Article by Thibaut D'hulst

On 23 September 2015, Advocate General Bot of the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "AG") delivered his opinion (the "Opinion") on a request for a preliminary ruling brought by the High Court of Ireland in a case pitting Maximilian Schrems - a member of the social network Facebook - against the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (the "Commissioner") (Case C-362/14, Maximilian Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner). The Opinion is of an advisory nature and does not bind the Court of Justice of the European Union (the "ECJ"). However, should the ECJ follow the AG's Opinion, its judgment would have a major impact on international transfers of personal data by European companies in general and on the way businesses organise data transfers from the EU to the US in particular.

Legal certainty with regard to international transfers of personal data by European companies

Under EU Directive 95/46/EC (the "Data Protection Directive" or "DPD"), personal data must not be transferred to a recipient outside the EEA unless such a recipient is located in a country which is deemed to provide an adequate level of protection (Article 25(1) of the DPD). This decision on "adequacy" is made by the European Commission in accordance with Article 25(6) of the DPD. For instance, in Decision 2000/520, the European Commission decided that the US Safe Harbour Privacy Principles ensure an adequate level of protection for personal data transferred from the EU to companies established in the US. The Safe Harbour system is a voluntary system and many US companies signed up to the Safe Harbour scheme and process personal data from the EU on the basis of Decision 2000/520.  

The question reviewed by the AG concerns the extent to which an "adequacy" decision by the European Commission prevents national Data Protection Authorities ("DPAs") from deciding otherwise. In particular, are DPAs prevented from investigating a complaint alleging that personal data transferred to the third country concerned are not adequately protected and from suspending the transfer of data to this country. The AG essentially held that they are not.

The AG based his Opinion on the observation that the independence of DPAs is an essential component of the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. This independence is not only laid down in Article 28(1) of the DPD, but also in Article 8(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (the "Charter"), which enshrines the highest level of the hierarchy of rules in EU law. According to the AG, independence entails that national data protection authorities have to be free from any external influence, including the decisions of the European Commission.

While acknowledging that European Commission decisions such as Decision 2000/520 are binding on the Member States and play an essential role in ensuring uniformity in the transfer conditions applicable in the different Member States, the AG held that "the Member States and therefore, within them, the national supervisory authorities cannot be absolutely bound by an adequacy decision adopted by the Commission". According to the AG, an interpretation of an instrument of secondary EU law, such as the DPD or Decision 2000/520, based on an irrebuttable presumption that fundamental rights will be observed, is not compatible with the duty of Member States to interpret and apply secondary EU law in a manner consistent with fundamental rights.

Organisation of data transfers from the EU to the US

Although the question raised by the High Court of Ireland solely related to the interpretation of the Data Protection Directive and of Decision 2000/520 without directly addressing their validity, the AG stated that the ECJ may still find it necessary to examine the validity of Decision 2000/520 in the case at hand. The AG added that Decision 2000/250 must be declared invalid in view of the overly general formulation of the derogations from the Safe Harbour principles for which it allows, and in view of its concrete implementation.

The annexes to Decision 2000/520 permit derogations from (all) Safe Harbour principles, for instance, if necessary to meet national security requirements, as well as to the extent necessary to meet the overriding legitimate interests furthered by a statute or government regulation that creates conflicting obligations. In his opinion, the AG held that the wording of these derogations unjustifiably interferes with the fundamental rights laid down in the Charter. The AG indicated that the problem arises in connection with this derogation. He was of the opinion that the wording is "too general" and as a result, the implementation of the derogations by US authorities is "not limited to what is strictly necessary". The AG also found that (i) personal data were used for other purposes than for those for which they were initially collected; (ii) users are not informed about the access to their data; and (iii) users do not have an effective right to be heard.

The AG also considered that respect for human rights is a condition of the lawfulness of EU acts. The AG held that the principle of proportionality requires that acts of EU institutions must be appropriate for attaining the legitimate objectives pursued. In this respect, the AG assessed the proportionality of the Safe Harbour derogations. According to the AG, the fact that the European Commission maintained Decision 2000/520 after the revelations made by Edward Snowden, the former CIA official, violate the fundamental rights of the Charter. In particular, the AG denounced that "the access which the United States intelligence authorities may have to the personal data transferred covers, in a generalised manner, all persons and all means of electronic communication and all the data transferred, including the content of the communications, without any differentiation, limitation or exception according to the objective of general interest pursued".

On this basis, the AG found Decision 2000/520 to be invalid and stated that the European Commission should have suspended the adequacy finding of the Safe Harbour scheme.

If the ECJ confirms this finding, the international transfer of personal data on the basis of Safe Harbour registration will become less reliable. As a result, companies may start looking for alternative solutions, such as standard data transfer agreements and Binding Corporate Rules ("BCR"). In addition, should the ECJ side with the AG, companies will have to review their existing contracts with service providers that transfer personal data outside the EU. Remarkably, the ECJ foresees to hand down its judgment as soon as 6 October 2015, which is unusually fast.   

The EU and US authorities are currently negotiating an update of the Safe Harbour principles. It is expected that these negotiations will be expedited by the Schrems case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions