Switzerland: Swiss Corruption Case Shows That Corporate Criminal Law Is A Wolf In Sheep’s Clothing

Last Updated: 1 August 2012
Article by Michael Hess and Roland M. Ryser

In a Swiss criminal investigation into bribery offences committed abroad, Alstom accepted heavy sanctions ordered by the federal prosecutor's office. Following the conviction of a Swiss financial institution for money-laundering, this is the second case in which Swiss corporate criminal law – until recently considered fairly harmless – has bared its teeth. These cases should spur companies into reviewing their compliance systems.

1. INTRODUCTION

The initial charges raised against Alstom by the federal prosecutor's office were dramatic: it was alleged that the company ran a system of slush funds financing bribes to foreign public officials in order to win public procurement contracts. The company was cleared of this initial allegation after an extensive investigation. However, the federal prosecutor's office concluded that foreign public officials had been bribed on three accounts. On 22 November 2011, a summary punishment order was issued against Alstom's Swiss subsidiary that was in charge of certain compliance procedures for the French group. The subsidiary was held liable for not having taken all necessary and reasonable organizational measures to prevent the payment of bribes to foreign public officials.

Following a recent conviction of a Swiss financial institution for money-laundering, the order rendered against Alstom by the federal prosecutor's office is the second case within a year in which the provision of the Swiss Criminal Code (SCC) which allows for criminal sanctions against corporate entities (Article 102 SCC) has bared its teeth. In April 2011, the District Court of Solothurn-Lebern had handed down a sentence for money-laundering (currently under appeal), finding that the company in question had failed to take the necessary precautionary measures in connection with a cash payment of CHF 4.6 million. The Court held that the company's organization was deficient, as there were no appropriate internal regulations in place. Since its introduction in 2003, corporate criminal law has been considered somewhat of a harmless figure in the background. Based on recent developments, however, that figure may turn out to be a fully-grown wolf.

2. THE "ALSTOM CASE "

Alstom is a group based in France with a global presence. Its core business lies in the construction and maintenance of large-scale infrastructural developments involving power plants, rail transport, and energy transfer. Accordingly, a majority of its customers are states or companies providing public services.

The group appointed consultants to secure such projects and, to some extent, provide support during the projects' implementation and completion. The usual arrangement with these consultants was for a contingency fee to be paid in installments when certain predefined milestones were reached. The criminal investigation revealed that on three occasions, consultancy fees were indirectly paid to executives of the customers or to persons belonging to the political establishment. In return, they ensured that the contracts were awarded to Alstom or that the customers refrained from claiming damages against the group.

2.1 Inadequate Organization

Pursuant to Article 102 SCC, companies are criminally liable for a felony or misdemeanor committed within the company if, due to inadequate organizational structures of the company, that offence cannot be attributed to any specific individual. For certain offences, such as bribery, the company may even be punished regardless of whether or not a specific individual within the company can be held accountable. However, a prerequisite for such a verdict would be that the company failed to take all necessary and reasonable organizational measures to prevent the offence.

The law does not define the organizational measures that are deemed necessary and reasonable. Rather, the appropriate measures depend, inter alia, on the size of the company, the business sector, and the market area. The OECD and various trade associations such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and economiesuisse have published principles on compliance management that may provide companies with some guidance. In addition, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) has issued a brochure on the prevention of corruption.

In a globalized economy, it is certainly insufficient to limit compliance to the organizational requirements of the state in which the company is incorporated. Rather, all relevant jurisdictions must be taken into account. As regards anticorruption legislation, this may mean that, for instance, the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) or the UK Bribery Act (2010) need to be considered.

Alstom issued internal regulations with an aim to reduce the risk of illegal payments. In particular, the regulations prohibited payments to consultants for bribes and defined the requirements for a consultant to be appointed. As a rule, consultancy agreements had to be concluded with legal entities having an existing, operative business and a physical presence in the country in which the project was to be carried out. Moreover, the consultants were supposed to have bank accounts in this country. Accordingly, consultancy agreements with shell or offshore companies were prohibited. Furthermore, the consultancy fees were limited to a certain percentage of the contract volume and the consultants were obliged to detail and substantiate the contractual services they had performed before any payment was made.

To strengthen its compliance, the French group had centralized major compliance functions within two subsidiaries established for that specific purpose. One of those subsidiaries, Alstom Network Schweiz AG, was the subject of the summary punishment order mentioned above. The company's responsibilities included, inter alia, checking the conformity of suggested consultants with internal compliance regulations and, subsequently, checking the payment process for conformity with the relevant contracts.

According to the federal prosecutor's office, Alstom Network Schweiz AG's showed deficiencies in the organizational integration of the compliance unit, its personal resources as well as the enforcement of the internal regulations on the prevention of corruption. The compliance unit was functionally affiliated with a unit of the group headquarters whose task was also to support the sales unit. The federal prosecutor's office doubted that this structure conformed to the general principle requiring compliance structures to be independent from any sales interests of the business units. According to the federal prosecutor's office, this organizational structure meant that the head of compliance was not given sufficient authority to effectively enforce compliance regulations.

It was further found that the personal resources of the compliance unit were insufficient, both from a qualitative and from a quantitative point of view. The group did not provide its compliance unit with sufficient staff and the employees lacked relevant experience, were insufficiently trained, and were not vested with adequate powers. In addition, the compliance unit failed to act against transgressions by consultants as well as by Alstom's own employees, and failed to pursue violations and circumventions of internal regulations.

2.2 Sanctions

Since the Swiss subsidiary had not taken all necessary and reasonable precautions to prevent bribery, it was fined an amount of CHF 2.5 million. The relevant provision of the SCC allows for fines of up to CHF 5 million against corporate entities. The fine imposed on Alstom's Swiss subsidiary was therefore in the middle of that range.

Outweighing the fine by far, the federal prosecutor also ordered the confiscation of the assets stemming from the criminal offence. The determination of the amounts subject to confiscation is controversial in a case in which a company wins a contract thanks to bribery. The punishment order limits the confiscation to the profits earned on such tainted contracts. Based on the operating profit margin, these profits were estimated at CHF 36.4 million. Hence, the federal prosecutor's office did not confiscate the entire turnover, as might have been possible in certain other jurisdictions. Remarkably, the profits were confiscated from Alstom Network Schweiz AG, although they had been earned by other, operative subsidiaries of the group. These subsidiaries had transferred their share of the profits to the accounts of the Swiss subsidiary in advance, apparently with a view to resolving the matter amicably. Thus, the operative subsidiaries were only indirectly involved in the criminal proceedings. A conviction for bribery offences can in certain cases lead to a ban from participating in public procurement proceedings, for example pursuant to a directive of the European Union. Particularly for suppliers like Alstom, which mainly service global public procurement needs, such a ban may have fatal consequences.

Thus, it is highly beneficial to the Alstom group that the criminal sanction was formally imposed on the Swiss subsidiary, which does not act on the procurement markets. The operative companies in each country as well as the holding company remained formally untainted, even though they may have suffered damage to their reputation since Alstom is publicly perceived as a conglomerate.

2.3 Dismissal of the Proceedings against the Holding Company

Criminal prosecution is not limited to companies domiciled in Switzerland. Swiss authorities may also exercise jurisdiction over foreign companies if the criminal offence in question was committed in Switzerland, if the organizational failure occurred in a division of that company located in Switzerland, or if the failure had ramifications in Switzerland. Therefore, the prosecution not only targeted Alstom's Swiss subsidiary but also the French holding company. The Swiss Criminal Code provides that, under certain conditions, prosecution and punishment may be waived if the offender has made reparations and if the general public and the persons harmed have little interest in the prosecution of the offender. Based on such considerations, the federal prosecutor's office dismissed the criminal proceedings against the French holding company, which is equivalent to an acquittal.

On the one hand, the federal prosecutor's office found that the French holding company was ultimately responsible and liable for developing the organizational side, implementation, controlling, and the HR component of the compliance department. To this extent, the holding company was to blame for organizational shortcomings too. On the other hand, however, the federal prosecutor's office recognized the considerable efforts of the holding company to act in conformity with the law, to improve the organization of the compliance department as well as the reparations paid by the Alstom group to the International Red Cross amounting to CHF 1 million. Thus, the federal prosecutor's office deemed a further punishment of the holding company unnecessary.

2.4 "Deal or No Deal"

Although Swiss criminal law does not generally provide for plea bargaining between criminal justice authorities and offenders, it seems as if the parties did come to an agreement in the case at hand:

Firstly, Alstom waived its right to appeal immediately after the summary punishment order and the order to dismiss proceedings had been issued. Secondly, the profits to be confiscated had previously been transferred by the operative affiliates to an account of the Swiss subsidiary. Thirdly, the conclusion of the proceedings had advantages for both the federal prosecutor's office and the French group. The federal prosecutor's office was able, in its view successfully, to bring the criminal proceedings to an end. Alstom had to pay a considerable sum of money but was eventually able to avoid a criminal conviction of the operative companies. Finally, the group was explicitly cleared from the allegation of running slush funds to finance bribery.

3. LESSONS LEARNED

Three major lessons can be learned from the Alstom case. Firstly, companies are required to set up an effective compliance mechanism tailored to their needs; otherwise they face considerable exposure to serious criminal sanctions. It does not suffice to simply introduce certain internal compliance regulations. Rather, it is crucial that such regulations be consistently enforced. Furthermore, the compliance department needs to be provided with the appropriate resources, be independent of any sales interests, and be vested with the necessary powers and authority. Since the federal prosecutor's office does not seem to have an issue with treating a group of companies as an entity for the purpose of criminal liability, holding companies bear the burden of ensuring and supervising compliance functions visà- vis their subsidiaries.

Secondly, the era in which corruption was seen as a necessary evil of international commerce is definitely over. The summary punishment order against Alstom serves as a clear signal that Swiss authorities intend to diligently pursue cases of bribery, even those involving foreign public officials.

Thirdly, the case at hand shows that a skilled defense strategy may prevent the worst from happening, should a company be targeted by law enforcement authorities despite having a compliance system in place. In such a situation, it is advisable to retain external counsel. This is particularly important given that in-house counsel cannot rely on the attorney-client privilege in order to protect confidential communications, a circumstance which may be crucial in criminal proceedings directed against the company.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions