When it comes to infringement actions, two dates are of
particular importance: date of publication and date of grant. Where
a competitor files an application in respect of subject matter that
you are, or may be, already using, and there is a risk that you
will be infringing the patent if granted, you may seek to defeat,
or at least delay, the application. In either case, you will need
to pay close attention to these two dates.
Patent infringement lawsuits can only be filed after grant of
the patent in question. However, pursuant to Article 35bis of the
Patent Act, damages for infringement may, in certain circumstances,
be calculated from the date the application was published in the
Patent Gazette. Article 35bis provides that a patentee will be
entitled to damages in respect of an infringing act carried out
after the date of publication of the application, provided the
infringer was, at the time, aware of the application.
The current procedural framework that regulates patent
oppositions allows pre-grant opposition proceedings. Any third
party is allowed to file an opposition within a period of 90 days
after publication of the application. Several grounds, either alone
or combined, can be used as the basis of an opposition including
lack of novelty or inventive step, non-patentable subject matter,
or the applicant's entitlement to file the application and be
granted a patent in Thailand. Often, the 90 day period allowed for
filing an opposition, will already have expired before a decision
to oppose has been taken. In that case, although it is not possible
to file a formal opposition, it is possible to notify the Examiner,
informally, of any relevant prior art or any Office Actions that
have been taken in relation to the priority or corresponding
applications. Although the Examiner is not obliged to consider such
notifications, in practice, most Examiners will do so.
Normally it takes years for oppositions to be considered;
meanwhile, examination of the application and grant of the patent
Apart from delaying grant, successful opposition proceedings
will, of course, ensure that the application does not proceed to
grant, thus removing the risk of future infringement.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
This article enunciates the recent, much awaited, and landmark judgment delivered on September 16, 2016 by Hon'ble Delhi High Court throwing light on the important provisions of the Copyright Act, 1962.
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion recently issued an office memorandum pursuant to receiving representations from various stakeholders for guidance with respect to the applicability of the provisions of Section 31D of the Copyright Act, 1957.
An Invention Disclosure Form is the documentation of the invention. This is a means to document particulars of your invention and submitting it to the patent attorney who is filing your patent application.
The Patents Act 1970, along with the Patents Rules 1972, came into force on 20th April 1972, replacing the Indian Patents and Designs Act 1911. The Patents Act was largely based on the recommendations of the Ayyangar Committee Report headed by Justice N. Rajagopala Ayyangar. One of the recommendations was the allowance of only process patents with regard to inventions relating to drugs, medicines, food and chemicals.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).