From 1 March 2012 the Rules of The Royal Court in Jersey
regarding bodies corporate being represented by its Directors in
respect of Court proceedings are changing.
If a body corporate wishes to appear by a Director then it is
incumbent on the body corporate to make an early decision as to who
is best placed to represent its interests, to ensure that the
Director is duly appointed and to make sure that if they are
unavailable for any hearing that leave of the Court is sought in
good time to appoint an alternative.
Within 7 days of the first hearing of the matter the body
corporate must file with the Court and send to all parties involved
in the action
a declaration of the name of the Director and, if different
from the address for service of the body corporate, the
Director's address, and
a copy of the resolution or other instrument of the body
corporate by which the Director is so authorized.
Failure to do so could result in the Court staying or even
striking out a claim brought by the body corporate or giving
judgment against it.
Only the named Director may appear at any hearing without leave
of the Court being given, although applications to change the name
of the appointed Director may be made to the Court given sufficient
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
Alibaba Group, the holding company for a group of People’s Republic of China-based Internet e-commerce companies with sales that exceed those of eBay and Amazon combined, has announced plans to make an initial public offering of its shares and to list those shares in, most likely, Hong Kong or the United States.
As leading lawyers in Cyprus Andreas Neocleous & Co LLC was invited to act as country experts for Cyprus in a study of the application of the cross-border mergers directive commissioned by the EU Directorate General for Internal Market and Services.
A Shareholder's Agreement is distinct from the company's constitution. Without a Shareholder's Agreement, the Company would be controlled solely and exclusively by the exercise of shareholding or directorship rights, through its constitution, and the Cyprus Companies Laws, which are generally insufficient, to protect the rights and interests of minority shareholders.
It is a fundamental principle of Cyprus Company Law that a limited liability Company has a legal personality and identity which, is separate from its shareholders, or directors, and that it is a separate legal entity, having separate rights and liabilities.
Some comments from our readers… “The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable” “I often find critical information not available elsewhere” “As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”