Serbia: The International Comparative Legal Guide To: Business Crime 2012 - A Practical Cross-Border Insight Into Business Crime (Serbia)

This article appeared in the 2012 edition of The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Business Crime; published by Global Legal Group Ltd, London

GENERAL CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

1.1. What authorities can prosecute business crimes, and are there different enforcement authorities at the national and regional levels?

Business crimes are generally prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor's office. As Serbia does not have a federal system, there is only one public prosecuting authority, composed of a Basic, Higher, Appellate, Republic and Special Public Prosecutor's office. The Special Public Prosecutor's office handles organised crime cases, a substantial number of which are business crimes.

1.2. If there are more than one set of enforcement agencies, please describe how decisions on which body will investigate and prosecute a matter are made.

In Serbia, some business crimes are also prosecuted by Penal Administrative Courts. However, these crimes are not crimes stricto sensu. For example, customs offences and offences related to foreign exchange transactions are prosecuted by the Penal Administrative Court.

In addition, in cases of breaches of the Protection of Competition Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 51/09) (Zakon o zaatiti konkurencije) (the "Competition Act"), the Commission for the Protection of Competition (the "Competition Commission") can impose monetary fines of up to 10% of the total annual income of the respective undertaking.

1.3. Is there any civil or administrative enforcement against business crimes? If so, what agencies enforce the laws civilly and which crimes do they combat?

In general, there is no such possibility.

However, the Corporate Criminal Liability Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 97/08) (Zakon o odgovornosti pravnih lica za krivična dela) (the "CCLA"), prescribes that following a motion from the public prosecutor, a court can impose an interim measure if the future confiscation of the material gain derived a crime would be difficult. On the other hand, the Competition Commission can determine and impose fines directly all in the same procedure. These fines are enforced by the Tax Authority.

2. ORGANISATION OF THE COURTS

2.1. How are the criminal courts in Serbia structured? Are there specialised criminal courts for particular crimes?

The structure of the criminal courts in Serbia corresponds to the sentence prescribed for each crime. For example, basic courts have jurisdiction over crimes punishable by a monetary fine or a sentence not exceeding 10 years and higher courts have jurisdiction for crimes with sentences exceeding 10 years.

In addition, the higher court also has jurisdiction over cases of organised crime, including business crime. According to the wording of the Criminal Procedure Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 76/10) (Zakonik o krivičnom postupku) (the "CPA)"), an organised crime group is a group of more than 3 persons who jointly consented to commit crimes in order to obtain material gains. The minimum sentence for this type of crime is 4 years.

2.2. Is there a right to a jury in business-crime trials?

There is no right to a jury in Serbia.

3. PARTICULAR STATUTUES AND CRIMES

3.1. Please describe any statutes that are commonly used in Serbia to prosecute business crimes, including the elements of the crimes and the requisite mental state of the accused:

  • Fraud and misrepresentation in connection with sales of securities

    There is no specific crime of fraud and misrepresentation in connection with the sale of securities. However, in this case the general rules on fraud under the Criminal Code (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 111/09) (Krivični zakonik) (the "CC") would apply, namely whoever with intent to acquire unlawful material gain for himself or another by false representation or concealment of facts deceives another or maintains such deception and thus induces such person to act detrimentally to his or another's property, shall be held liable.

    As stated above, the requisite mens rea is intent.
  • Insider trading

    Holders of non-public sensitive information have a duty not to disclose such information to third persons. In case a person intentionally discloses such information with intent to make a material gain or to cause detriment to another, they shall be held accountable, pursuant to the newly enacted Capital Markets Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 31/11) (Zakon o tr~iatu kapitala).
  • Embezzlement

    Embezzlement is the unlawful gain of movables entrusted to a person who holds an official position in a government or in a company. The requisite mens rea state is intent.
  • Bribery of government officials

    There is no specific crime of bribery of government officials. However, the CC contains certain provisions related to public sector bribery. The offence of bribery and related offences are stipulated in the following articles: (i) Giving Bribes (Article 368); and (ii) Soliciting and Accepting Bribes (Article 367).

    All of the offences dealt with below require the intention of the offender (dolus directus or dolus eventualis) in order to be considered as such.
  • Soliciting and accepting bribes

    Article 367 prohibits officials from directly or indirectly soliciting or accepting gifts or other benefits, or promises of gifts or other benefits, for themselves or others in return for the performance or the omission to perform an official act, which are contrary to their duties. Soliciting and accepting bribes in return for the performance or the omission to perform an official act which forms part of their duties are also sanctioned.

    Furthermore, a criminal offence is also considered to have occurred if bribes were solicited or accepted after the performance or the omission to perform an official duty. The highest punishment (up to fifteen years' imprisonment) is prescribed if the soliciting and accepting of bribes occurs in respect of uncovering a criminal offence, investigating or conducting criminal proceedings, or pronouncing or enforcing a criminal sanction.

    The CC does not regulate as a separate offence the soliciting and accepting of bribes in the private sector or by a foreign official. Instead, it extends the application of Article 367 to foreign officials and officers-in-charge as possible offenders. The definition of a foreign official includes members of the legislative, executive and judicial bodies of a foreign country, officials or employees of international organisations and bodies, and judges and others officials of international courts. The term officer-in-charge includes owners of companies or other commercial entities, or employees in a company, establishment or other entity who has been charged, based on his function, invested assets or authorities, with specific tasks concerning the management of assets, production or other activity, or supervision thereof, or has been effectively charged with carrying out specific tasks.
  • Giving bribes

    Pursuant to Article 368, bribery is defined as the making, offering or promising of a gift or other benefit to an official or other person in return for the official performing an official act within his authority that he is prohibited from performing, or failing to perform an official act that he is obliged to perform, or acting as intermediary in such bribing of an official. The offence is also considered to have occurred where bribe was given in return for the performance or omission to perform an official act in accordance with their duties. Using the same legislative technique as with passive bribery, the law provides that the same criminal offence also exists if the bribe is given to a foreign official or an officer-in-charge of a company, institution or other entity.

    The CC provides that an offender can be exempted from punishment if he reports the offence prior to becoming aware that it had been uncovered.
  • Criminal anti-competition

    Abuse of a dominant position

    If a person in charge in a company or a company itself abuses a dominant position or by entering into monopolistic agreements causes disruption to the market and therefore brings one entity into a more favourable position in relation to others and acquires a material gain or causes damage to another business entity, they shall be held accountable.

    It should be noted that abuse of a dominant position is a factual question and cannot be determined by a criminal court. Taking this into account, the relevant competition authority must first determine if there was an abuse of dominant position on the relevant market, by taking all relevant factors thereof.

    Furthermore, this particular crime can be prosecuted only in cases where the Competition Commission previously found that the perpetrator abused a dominant position and this finding has been confirmed by the Administrative Court. There is a public debate in progress, centred around the fact that the CA is not aligned with the provisions of the CC.
  • Tax crimes

    Tax crimes are covered both in the CC and the Tax Procedure and Administration Act (Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia, no. 53/2010) (Zakon o poreskom postupku i poreskoj administraciji), but they all include in some form or another tax evasion or the intent to conceal a certain significant fact that could be important in determining one's tax obligation, for the purposes of avoiding tax.
  • Government-contracting fraud

    The specific crime of government-contracting fraud is not prescribed for under Serbian legislation. However, the general rules on fraud would apply. In addition, if the fraud is connected to government officials, this would certainly be seen by the court as an aggravating circumstance.
  • Any other crime of particular interest in Serbia

    Trading in influence

    Article 366 of the CC sanctions both sides in the "trading". The offence includes acts by persons (including foreign officials) who solicit or accept a reward or other benefit for themselves or others, directly or through third persons, in return for using their official or social position or actual or perceived influence to intercede in the performance or failure to perform an official act. Trading in influence to intercede in the performance or failure to perform an official act contrary to an official's duties constitutes an offence even if no reward or other benefit has been received by the offender; however, a higher punishment is prescribed if such benefit is solicited or accepted. Furthermore, a person offering or giving a reward or other benefit to another for trading in influence is also considered a perpetrator of the offence.

    Unlawful collection and payment

    According to Article 362 of the CC, unlawful collection and payment are defined as acts by an official who collects an amount from a person who is not obliged to pay such amount, or charges a person more than such person is obliged to pay, or who, when paying or handing over items to another, fails to pay, pays less or fails to hand over, or hands over less than the amount/quantity owed.

3.2. Is there liability for inchoate crimes in Serbia? Can a person be liable for attempting to commit a crime, whether or not the attempted crime is completed?

Yes, a person can be held liable if he/she commences a premeditated crime, but does not complete it, if such crime is punishable by a term of imprisonment of five years or more, or in cases when the law explicitly provides for punishment of the attempt.

However, if the person voluntarily abandoned the actus reus, he/she may be remitted from punishment.

4. CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY

4.1. Is there entity liability for criminal offences? If so, under what circumstances will an employee's conduct be imputed to the entity?

Yes, (i) if a person in charge, acting within their authority, culpably committed a criminal offence with the intention to obtain benefits for the company, or (ii) if a person acting under the control or supervision of the person in charge was enabled to commit a criminal offence due to lack of supervision or control of the decision-maker.

4.2. Is there personal liability for managers, officers, and directors if the entity becomes liable for a crime?

The Serbian system of corporate criminal liability is multidirectional. If the persons in charge of a company are liable, then the entity will be liable as well. In addition, both the company and the persons in charge can be prosecuted.

4.3. Where there is entity liability and personal liability, do the authorities have a policy or preference as to when to pursue an entity, when to pursue an individual, or both?

Generally, the authorities prosecute both.

5. STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS

5.1. How are enforcement-limitations periods calculated, and when does a limitations period begin running?

The statute of limitations period starts when actus reus is completed. The period itself is linked to the sentence prescribed for each crime.

5.2. Can crimes occurring outside the limitations period be prosecuted if they are part of a pattern or practice, or ongoing conspiracy?

No. If the absolute limitations period (please see below) has expired, the crime cannot be prosecuted.

5.3. Can the limitations period be tolled? If so, how?

The limitation can be tolled by every act of the prosecuting authority; however, there is a so-called absolute limitation period, which occurs after double time of the limitation time prescribed for that crime. After the absolute period, no prosecution is possible, regardless of the tolling.

6. INITIATION OF INVERSTIGATIONS

6.1. How are investigations initiated? Are there any rules or guidelines governing the government's initiation of any investigation? If so, please describe them

Investigations into minor criminal offences must be initiated by the aggrieved party, i.e. the Public Prosecutor does not prosecute minor criminal offences.

On the other hand, the Public Prosecutor has a duty to initiate an investigation into all other crimes, i.e. those not deemed to be minor as soon as it is in possession of sufficient information concerning such crime.

6.2. Do the criminal authorities have formal and/or informal mechanisms for cooperating with foreign prosecutors? Do they cooperate with foreign prosecutors?

Yes, through numerous conventions of the Council of Europe. However, the system is not as efficient as the one derived from the former Third-Pillar of the EU, relating to judicial cooperation in criminal matters.

7. PROCEDURES FOR GATHERING INFORMATION FROM A COMPANY

7.1. What powers does the government have generally to gather information when investigating business crimes?

The Public Prosecutor or the police can request that a person voluntarily provide all available information related to the crime. If the person is a suspect, then he/she must cooperate.

There is a general obligation under CPA to hand in every object that could serve as evidence in the procedure, which means that the police can collect evidence in the offices of the company itself if there is probable cause that such would serve as evidence in a criminal proceeding.

Currently such raids are overseen by an Investigative Judge, but this is due to change under proposed changes to the Serbian criminal procedure, which, if enacted, will see a shift in power from the Investigative Judge to the Public Prosecutor. On the whole, the changes will introduce a more adversarial approach to the procedure.

Document Gathering

7.2. Under what circumstances can the government demand that a company under investigation produce documents to the government, and under what circumstances can the government raid a company under investigation and seize documents?

The provisions of the CPA apply to the CCLA, unless otherwise specified by the latter law. Therefore, it could be inferred that a company under investigation is obliged to produce documents to the government which might serve as evidence in the criminal proceedings.

The same goes for the dawn raid of a company. The company must cooperate and allow a search, provided that there is probable cause that a search will lead to evidence of a criminal act or other objects significant to the investigation.

7.3. Are there any protections against production or seizure that the company can asset for any types of documents? For example, does Serbia recognise any privileges protecting documents prepared by attorneys or communications with attorneys? Do Serbia's labour laws protect personal documents or employees, even if located in company files?

In principle, any communication that could fall into attorney-client privilege cannot be used as evidence in the criminal proceeding.

Personal data of the employees are protected from unauthorised access by third parties, provided that such access is related to labour rights and obligations. Therefore, if an employee is under criminal investigation, he/she could not rely on the foregoing provision of the Labour Act (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 54/09) (Zakon o radu).

7.4. Under what circumstances can the government demand that a company employee produce documents to the government, or raid the home or office of a third person and seize documents?

A similar procedure would apply as in the case of the company. Please see the answer under question 7.2 above.

7.5. Under what circumstances can the government demand that a third person produce documents to the government, or raid the home or office of a third person and seize documents?

Idem.

Questioning of Individuals:

7.6. Under what circumstances can the government demand that an employee, officer or director of a company under investigation submit to questioning? In what forum can the questioning take place?

If a person is suspected of having committed a criminal act, he/she may be questioned in relation to such. The usual forum is in a police station, or court.

7.7. Under what circumstances can the government demand that a third person submit to questioning? In what forum can the questioning take place?

Idem.

7.8. What protections can a person being questioned by the government asset? Is there a right to refuse to answer the government's questions? Is there a right to be represented by an attorney during questioning?

All protections guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights can be invoked during questioning,

Yes, if a person was to violate a professional secrecy undertaking or if such an answer was to lead to self-incrimination, he/she can refuse to answer certain questions.

Yes, there is a right to representation by an attorney during questioning.

8. INITIATION OF PROSECUTIONS / DEFERRED PROSECUTION/ CIVIL DISPOSITIONS

8.1. How are criminal cases initiated?

Criminal cases are initiated usually on the back of a criminal complaint.

8.2. Are there any rules or guidelines governing the government's decision to charge an entity or individual with a crime? If so, please describe them.

There are no strict rules. However, there should be enough inculpatory evidence in order to indict the suspect.

8.3. Can a defendant and the government agree to resolve a criminal investigation through pretrail diversion or an agreement to defer prosecution? If so, please describe any rules or guidelines governing whether pretrial diversion or deferred prosecution are available to dispose of criminal investigations.

Please see answer under question 14.1.

8.4. In addition to or instead of any criminal disposition to an investigation, can a defendant be subject to any civil penalties or remedies? If so, please describe the circumstances under which civil penalties or remedies are appropriate.

In addition to the criminal disposition, the aggrieved person can also bring a civil claim against the convicted person for damages caused as a result of the crime.

9. BURDEN OR PROOF

9.1. For each element of the business crimes identified above, which party has the burden of proof? Which party has the burden of proof with respect to any affirmative defences?

Currently, the court, ex officio, has the burden of proof; however, with the proposed shift towards an adversarial system, the burden of proof will rest with the prosecution.

9.2. What is the standard of proof that the party with the burden must satisfy?

The court must find that all elements of the crime have been established in order to render a guilty verdict, in accordance with the principle in dubio pro reo, meaning that in case of doubt, the court must always render an acquittal.

9.3. In a criminal trial, who is the arbiter of fact? Who determines whether the party has satisfied its burden of proof?

The court is the arbiter of facts. The court can reach judgment by way of its own reasoning and there are no rules to which the court must adhere when reaching a judgment.

10. CONSPIRACY / AIDING AND ABETTING

10.1. Can a person who conspires with or assists another to commit a crime be liable? If so, what is the nature of the liability and what are the elements of the offence?

A person who induces or assists others to commit a crime will be held responsible as an accomplice.

The person must be aware that his/her actions contributed to the overall goal – the perpetration of a crime by the main perpetrator.

11. COMMON DEFENCES

11.1. Is it a defence to a criminal charge that the defendant did not have the requisite intent to commit the crime? If so, who has the burden of proof with respect to intent?

Yes, however some crimes are also punishable without intent as the necessary element, e.g. causing bankruptcy as provided for under the CC.

11.2. Is it a defence to a criminal charge that the defendant was ignorant of the law i.e. that he did not know that his conduct was unlawful? If so, what are the elements of this defence, and who has the burden of proof with respect to the defendant's knowledge of the law?

Yes, if the person had no duty to know that his/her acts constitute a criminal offence, then there is no culpability.

11.3. Is it a defence to a criminal charge that the defendant was ignorant of the facts i,e. that he did not know that he had engaged in conduct that he knew was unlawful? If so, what are the elements of this defence, and who has the burden of proof with respect to the defendant's knowledge of the facts?

Yes, a compelling mistake exists where the person was not required or could not avoid a mistake about a particular circumstance that constitutes the criminal offence.

12. VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE OBLIGATIONS

12.1. If a person becomes aware that a crime has been committed, must the person report the crime to the government? Can the person be liable for failing to report the crime to the government?

In principle, a person must report a crime to the authorities if he/she has knowledge that a crime (only those crimes that can be prosecuted ex officio) has or is being committed.

A person who has knowledge that another person has committed a crime, punishable under law by thirty to forty years' imprisonment, and deliberately fails to report it before the offence or the perpetrator are uncovered, shall be held liable and punished by imprisonment of up to two years. The sentences are higher if the perpetrator is an official or person in charge.

13. COOPRATION PROVISIONS / LENIENCY

13.1. If a person voluntarily discloses criminal conduct to the government or cooperates in a government criminal investigation of the person, can the person request leniency from the government? If so, what rules or guidelines govern the government's ability to offer leniency in exchange for voluntary disclosures or cooperation?

Yes, under changes to the CPA, a person who is a member of a organised crime group may be granted cooperative witness status, if his/her testimony would lead to the discovery or prevention of other crimes committed by the the organised crime group. Cooperative witness status may not be granted to the person purported to be the leader of the crime group.

13.2. Describe the extent of cooperation, including the steps that an entity would take, that is generally required of entities seeking leniency in Serbia, and describe the favourable treatment generally received.

According to the CPA, there is no possibility for an entity to benefit from leniency.

14. PLEA BARGAINING

14.1. Can a defendant voluntarily decline to contest criminal charges in exchange for a conviction on reduced charges, or in exchange for an agreed upon sentence?

In cases where crimes are punishable by a maximum prison sentence of 12 years, the Public Prosecutor and the defendant can reach an agreement and stipulate that a certain sentence will be imposed if the defendant pleads guilty. However, this agreement is subject to revision by the trial court, which can either reject or accept the proposed agreement.

14.2. Please describe any rules or guidelines governing the government's ability to plea bargain with a defendant. Must any aspect of the plea bargain be approved by the court?

Idem.

15. ELEMENTS OF A CORPORATE SENTENCE

15.1. After the court determines that a defendant is guilty of a crime, are there any rules or guidelines governing the court's imposition of sentence on the defendant? Please describe the sentencing process.

Once the court determines that a defendant is guilty, the sentence is left to the court's sole discretion and there are no set rules thereto. However, the court may take into account certain mitigating and aggravating circumstances (the consequences of the criminal act, the standing of the defendant during trial, remorse, the defendant's criminal record, if any, etc.).

15.2. Before imposing a sentence on a corporation, must the court determine whether the sentence satisfies any elements? If so, please describe those elements.

When imposing a sentence on a corporation, the court may also take into account certain mitigating and aggravating circumstances, such as the level of culpability of the corporation, the number of persons in charge and especially whether the corporation has adopted any compliance programme in order to prevent the occurrence of the criminal act.

In addition, the corporation can be exempted from the punishment if it (prior to learning of the initiation of the criminal procedure against it) discovers and reports the criminal act. Furthermore, a corporation may be exempted if it voluntary and without delay takes necessary steps to remove harmful effects or returns unlawfully obtained property.

16. APPEALS

16.1. Is a guilty or a non-guilty verdict appealable by either the defendant or the government?

Pursuant to the CPA, both parties are entitled to lodge an appeal, regardless of whether a guilty or non-guilty verdict is rendered.

16.2. Is a criminal sentence following a guilty verdict appealable? If so, which part may appeal?

Yes, both the Public Prosecutor and the defendant can appeal and seek redress from the appellate court for errors made by the trial court. If only the defendant appeals, the principle of reformatio in peius will apply, meaning that neither the appellate nor the trial court in a potential new trial may increase the sentence.

16.3. What is the appellate court's standard of review?

The grounds for appeal are listed in the CPA and relate to both factual errors and errors in law. If any of the grounds are satisfied, the appellate court will quash the judgment of the trial court and order a re-trial. Furthermore, the appellate court can also reverse the judgment and enter into its own judgment.

16.4. If the appellate court upholds the appeal, what powers does it have to remedy any injustice by the trial court?

If it upholds the appeal, the appellate court can quash the judgment and order a retrial. If there were only errors in law by the trial court, it can reverse the judgment by entering its own.

In addition, the defendant can lodge an appeal against the decision of the appellate court in a case where the appellate court reversed the acquittal of the trial court and rendered a guilty verdict. In addition, the defendant can submit a motion for a trial de novo and seek to remedy the errors of the trial court. The grounds for trial de novo are serious breaches of the procedural rights of the defendant, i.e. the judgment was based on false testimony, new evidence appears which if it has been disclosed in the earlier stages of the proceedings would have led to an acquittal, etc. Furthermore, the public prosecutor can submit a motion for the protection of legality in order to remedy the errors of both the appellate and trial court.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions