Switzerland: Competition Switzerland - Q 3 2011

Last Updated: 18 October 2011
Article by Silvio Venturi and Pascal Favre

On July 11 2011, the Competition Commission ("Comco") closed its investigation against Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG in connection with restrictions on online retailing of household appliances (white goods) by reaching an amicable settlement. The Comco came to the conclusion that the prohibitions on sales via online stores are in principle unlawful and that Internet sales should only be restricted under some very strict conditions. This procedure allowed the Comco to establish guidelines on restrictions to online retailing, drawing on the practice of the European Commission1 and certain member states' national authorities2. The decision also provides guidance on Comco's practice in relation to selective distribution systems.

Content of the amicable settlement

The investigation opened on September 15 2010 was directed against Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG. Electrolux AG had completely forbidden its distributors (be they members of its selective distribution network or not) from selling household appliances online; as for V-Zug AG, it was imposing various restrictions on its distributors regarding such sales. Based on an amicable settlement entered into with the Comco at the end of the investigation procedure, Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG made a commitment to allow retailers who are members of their selective distribution network to trade online, and also (in principle) to do so under a different domain name from the one they use for their physical sales points. The Comco however authorised Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG to impose specific qualitative requirements on online retailing and to oblige their resellers to simultaneously run a physical sales point. The Comco also agreed that Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG may oblige their approved resellers to set up their website so as to make sure their contact details (company name and full address) as well as the addresses of their physical points of sale clearly appear on it and at first glance.

The reasoning of the Comco

The Comco considered that the bans imposed by Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG amounted to unlawful "agreements" affecting competition, despite the fact that such bans could appear as being the result of measures unilaterally imposed by these two manufacturers. As a matter of fact, it is not necessary under Swiss law to have a binding agreement between the parties involved in order to conclude to the existence of an "agreement affecting competition" (cf. Article 4 para. 1 ACart); it is sufficient to prove the existence of some sort of – conscious and intended – cooperation that may objectively affect competition on the market. In this respect, the Comco highlighted the fact that the ban on online sales announced by Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG, if it had been implemented, would have been abided by the "mixed" resellers (that is to say those who are both trading on the Internet and selling goods in physical points of sale), since their refusal to respect the announced prohibitions would have resulted in a cessation of deliveries and, subsequently, in a considerable decline in their turnover.

The Comco denied that the contemplated ban on online trading could fall within the scope of Article 5 para. 4 ACart, which forbids the setting of fixed resale prices (retail price maintenance) and the granting of territories to the extent that sales by other distributors into these territories are not permitted (absolute territorial protection). The Comco indicated in this respect that a restriction on online trading could only be likened to the setting of fixed resale prices in qualified circumstances, notably when the ban on online sales is combined with price recommendations or with agreements that influence the price policy of retailers, or when – in addition to forbidding or restricting the online business – the supplier threatens to exert or actually exerts pressure on the retailers (threats, intimidation, warnings, sanctions, delay or suspension of sales, etc.) so as to ensure that they apply a certain price level. Besides, the Comco reiterated that, according to paragraph 10 of its Notice on the Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements of June 28 2010, sales on the Internet shall be regarded as passive sales and hence that a ban on these sales can fall within the scope of Article 5 para. 4 ACart if the manufacturer agrees with its exclusive retailer to prevent access to its website to customers from outside the designated territory, or if the retailer commits to introducing a system on his website that automatically redirects such customers towards the manufacturer's or another retailer's website, or if the retailer commits to interrupting any transaction on the Internet whenever the credit card of a customer is indicating an address outside the designated area.

The Comco then examined if the ban on online trade could be analyzed as a significant restriction of competition (cf. Article 5 para. 1 ACart), which would not be justified on grounds of economic efficiency pursuant to Article 5 para. 2 ACart. Based upon some recent economic studies, the Comco first pointed out the fairly substantial price differences that can usually be observed between products sold online and those which are sold in physical points of sale. The Comco then indicated that Internet sales significantly increase price transparency, in particular by reducing the costs and the time necessary for a consumer to find a retailer willing to sell him the goods he is looking for ("search cost"). According to the Comco, it is also because of this transparency requirement that the market participants should be forbidden from taking measures that would make the publication on the Internet of online product prices more difficult. Such a transparency, combined with lower prices, has a disciplinary effect on the prices adopted in the physical points of sale and (indirectly) puts pressure on the prices and margins of the manufacturers themselves. The Comco, in consideration of the fact that an outright prohibition (or a restriction) on online sales affects price competition, and after reiterating that a ban on Internet sales shall be construed as a limitation of passive sales pursuant to the Notice on Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements (cf. sections 3 and 12 para. 2 let. c), came to the conclusion that such a ban amounted in this case to a qualitatively significant restriction of competition within the meaning of section 12 (2) of the Notice on Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements. From a quantitative point of view as well, the contemplated ban appeared to be significant: with a cumulated market share of about 50 % of the "large household appliances" market, Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG clearly exceeded the threshold at which restrictions of competition are considered to become significant pursuant to section 13 ( 1 ) of the Notice on Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements (i.e. absence of a significant restriction of competition when none of the undertakings participating in the agreement has a market share in excess of 15%, unless there are several similar parallel vertical distribution networks, in which case the market share threshold is reduced to 5%). Moreover, both companies were envisaging – more or less at the same time – implementing limitations on online sales with a similar object.

After concluding that the contemplated agreement led to a significant restriction of competition, the Comco further examined whether such a restriction could be justified on grounds of economic efficiency according to Article 5 para. 2 ACart. Pursuant to section 16 (4) of the Notice on Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements (which clarifies Article 5 para. 2 ACart), an agreement affecting competition may be justified, inter alia, when it appears necessary to ensure the uniformity and quality of the contractual products or to avoid inefficient levels of sales promotion measures (which can occur when some manufacturers or distributors are able to exploit the sales promotion efforts of other producers or distributors ("free-riding")). In this respect, the Comco considered that the fight against free-riding by online retailers at the expense of the physical points of sale was not a decisive argument. An important part of the customer base of household appliances consists of professional buyers (construction companies, architects, real estate agencies, etc.), who do not need specific advice when placing their orders. Furthermore, the investigation of the Comco revealed that Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG both had about 10 permanent showrooms spread over the Swiss territory, where customers could also obtain information about the products of these manufacturers before placing any order on the Internet. In addition, and most importantly, recent economic studies show that free-riding is not necessarily detrimental to retail shops operators, but rather that retail outlets and online retailing tend to increasingly influence each other to the extent that they appear to be complementary distribution channels. The Comco also pointed out that it seemed doubtful in the case at hand whether an outright ban on online sales would actually be "necessary" in the fight against free-riding since suppliers could for example try to compensate for the additional costs referred to by retailers by paying them a fixed amount. In any event, the Comco left consideration of that issue open since the involved companies made a commitment (in the amicable settlement) to organize their distribution network in such a way as to oblige every approved retailer wishing to trade online to simultaneously run a physical point of sale; such a system ensures that the costs related to the setting up of showrooms and to the provision of expert advice will be borne by all members of the selective distribution network. Finally, the Comco was not convinced by the argument put forward by V-Zug AG according to which the limitation of online retailing helps preventing faulty installation of the concerned household appliances, the former highlighting the fact that retailers doing business exclusively on the Internet may still work with specialised installers in order to guarantee first-class services.

Other guidance on purely qualitative selective distribution

In the course of the investigation, Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG tried to justify the contemplated ban on online sales by submitting that they had actually put in place a "purely qualitative" distribution system, that is to say a distribution system in which the distributors are exclusively selected on the basis of objective and qualitative criteria required by the nature of the product (cf. section 4 (2) of the Notice on the Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements). The Comco took this opportunity to clarify the conditions under which such a distribution system can, in its view, be considered to be a lawful restriction of competition:

  • the selective distribution system must be "required" by the nature of the product (which means that it is necessary in order to safeguard product quality and ensure its correct use);
  • the retailers must be selected on the basis of objective criteria of a qualitative nature, which must be set in a uniform way and applied in a non-discriminatory manner;
  • the set criteria should not go beyond what is necessary;
  • the selective distribution system should neither fall within the definition of a "hardcore restriction" according to Article 5 para. 4 ACart, nor contain a qualitatively significant restriction in the meaning of section 12 (2) of the Notice on the Competition Law Treatment of Vertical Agreements.

Following up on the recent "GABA" case,3 the Comco reiterated that technically complex products – for which advice or assistance are often necessary – are generally well suited for purely selective distribution systems. The Comco however stressed that if a company manufacturing products under different brands wishes to distribute them through different distribution channels and to position them in different price segments, it will then not be possible to justify a selective distribution system only for those products in the highest price segments if the products of the various brands are technically similar and if the way one should use them does not fundamentally differ. The fact for a manufacturer to sell its products in Switzerland through a selective distribution system, contrary to what it does abroad for the same products, will also be considered problematic.

As far as online sales are concerned, following the commitments Electrolux AG and V-Zug AG had made in the amicable settlement, the Comco did not have to address the question of whether or not a retailer selling products on the Internet may be excluded from a purely selective distribution system. Nonetheless, the Comco noted that a manufacturer distributing its products through "discounters" who run physical points of sale (that is retailers whose main selling point is price rather than product display or advice to their clients) would not be lawfully permitted to exclude online retailers from its distribution network. In addition, the Comco specified that an online retailer does not need to personally meet the requirements of the supplier in terms of client advice, delivery, assembly work or customer service, but that these conditions can be fulfilled by setting up collaborations with specialised third parties.


1 Cf. EU Guidelines on Vertical Restraints, 2010/C 130/01.

2 Cf. German Federal Cartel Office, Decision dated 25.9.2009, B 3 – 123/08 – Contact lenses. Eg. French Competition Council n° 08-D-25 of October 29 2008 relating to practices implemented in the sector of cosmetics and personal care products sold under the guidance of a pharmacist.

3 Cf. DPC/RPW 2010/1, p. 65.

Tavernier Tschanz – October 2011

For more information, please contact Silvio Venturi (venturi@taverniertschanz.com) or Pascal G. Favre (favre@taverniertschanz.com), tel. +41 (0) 22 704 37 00.


The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions