The United Arab Emirates (UAE) joined the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims, 1976 (the "Convention") by virtue of the federal decree No. 118/1997. Since then the Convention has become a national legislation with full legal effect.

According to article 1, shipowners and salvors may limit their legal liability according to the rules of the Convention for certain claims. The convention defined both shipowners and salvors as those who can benefit from and apply the limitation of liability as set out by the Convention.

Article 2 of the Convention provides for the claims which are subject to limitation of liability while article 3 provides for the claims exempted from the limitation of liability.
Article 4 of the Convention provides that:

"A person liable shall not be entitled to limit his liability if it is proved that the loss resulted from his personal act or omission, committed with the intent to cause such loss, or recklessly and with knowledge that such loss would probably result."

The approach of article 4 was applied literally by the courts of the UAE. The personal act or omission was expressed by the UAE courts as a personal fault which takes two forms. According to the UAE court judgments, evaluation of the personal fault is subjective depending on the circumstances that surround the case. The burden of proving the personal fault is on the claimant who suffered the loss and who wants to deprive the person at fault from the benefit of limitation of liability. The fault description is considered to be a legal matter.

Article 140 of the Commercial Maritime Law No. 26 for the year 1981 as amended by the federal law No. 11 for the year 1988 (CML), also supports the provision of article 4 of the Convention, and the approach of the UAE courts in applying the provision of the convention. Article 140 of CML provides for personal fault on the part of the shipowner in order to deprive him from limiting his liability and it also puts the burden of proving such fault on the claimant.

Not only does the convention provide for the limitation of shipowners liability but so too does the CML. The main difference between both is that the Convention contains more comprehensive provisions which cover limitation of liability and therefore its provision will overrule any other provisions in the UAE laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.