United States: Will California's Attempt To Invalidate Arbitration Agreements And Class Action Waivers For CCPA Claims Prove Successful?

The day the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) will become operative (January 1, 2020) is fast approaching. We have written extensively about the CCPA since it passed, and our past client alerts and a variety of CCPA-related materials can be found in our CCPA Resource Center.

Here, we focus on the CCPA's private right of action and the California legislature's effort to invalidate applicable arbitration and class action waiver provisions. The CCPA permits plaintiffs to seek actual damages, statutory damages, or injunctive or declaratory relief when certain

nonencrypted or nonredacted personal information . . . is subject to an unauthorized access and exfiltration, theft, or disclosure as a result of the business's violation of the duty to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the information to protect . . . .

Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.150. In furtherance of this private right of action, the CCPA prohibits: "[a]ny provision of a contract or agreement of any kind that purports to waive or limit in any way a consumer's rights under [the CCPA], including, but not limited to, any right to a remedy or means of enforcement." Cal. Civ. Code. § 1798.192. Section 1798.192 further says that any such contractual provisions "shall be deemed contrary to public policy and shall be void and unenforceable." Though written broadly, this provision can be read as another attempt by the state of California to target arbitration and class action waiver clauses, despite clear United States Supreme Court precedent enforcing arbitration agreements and class action waivers. While it remains to be seen how state and federal courts will interpret this provision, businesses that may find themselves the subject of CCPA class action lawsuits will be able to rely on Supreme Court precedent to argue that the CCPA's attempted prohibition on arbitration agreements and class action waivers is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

The Supreme Court's Firm Support of Arbitration and Class Action Waivers

Over the past decade, the United States Supreme Court has consistently affirmed the strong federal policy favoring arbitration and the enforceability of class action waivers in arbitration agreements. The Supreme Court has explained that "the FAA was designed to promote arbitration" and preempts state laws that undermine that goal of the FAA.1 The Supreme Court recently reaffirmed that the FAA supersedes state laws that treat arbitration agreements differently than other contracts.2

Beginning in 2011, with the Supreme Court's landmark decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, the Supreme Court has on several occasions also confirmed that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are enforceable. In Concepcion, the Supreme Court held that class action waivers in arbitration provisions are enforceable and found that the FAA preempted a California rule that attempted to prohibit class action waivers in consumer arbitration agreements. A few years later in DirecTV Inc. v. Imburgia, the Supreme Court again confirmed that class action waivers are enforceable.3 And in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. Varela, decided just this past term, the Supreme Court found that parties cannot be compelled to class arbitration unless the arbitration agreement explicitly contemplates and provides for such class-wide arbitration.4

This series of Supreme Court decisions has led even the California Supreme Court, which has not viewed arbitration and class action waivers favorably, to enforce class action waivers in certain contexts. In Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co., the California Supreme Court found that a provision of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) that as applied would have prohibited class waivers in arbitration agreements was preempted by the FAA.5 Sanchez addressed the CLRA's anti-waiver provision in California Civil Code § 1751, which contains language similar to that found in the CCPA's § 1798.192 prohibition on contract terms. Section 1751 states, "[a]ny waiver by a consumer of the provisions of this title is contrary to public policy and shall be unenforceable and void." Even though the CLRA's anti-waiver provision did not facially discriminate against arbitration, the Sanchez court found that the anti-waiver was "preempted insofar as it bars class waivers in arbitration agreements covered by the FAA."6

The FAA Likely Preempts the CCPA's Prohibition on Class Action Waivers

Despite the series of pro-arbitration decisions issued by the United States Supreme Court in recent years, the state of California seems to have gone back to the well one more time in its effort to invalidate class action waivers in certain contexts. As mentioned above, the CCPA prohibits contracts or agreements that purport to waive or limit in any way a consumer's right to a remedy or means of enforcement under the CCPA. Cal. Civ. Code. § 1798.192. The California legislature's decision to include this provision in the CCPA suggests that the legislature remains hostile to class action waivers.

Litigation regarding the enforceability of class action waivers as applied to claims under the CCPA seems inevitable in the short term. The United States Supreme Court cases since Concepcion and California Supreme Court cases like Sanchez provide strong support for businesses to argue that this latest attempt by the California legislature to defeat arbitration agreements and invalidate class action waivers is preempted by the FAA. The FAA should apply to most, if not all, putative class action lawsuits brought under the CCPA because the FAA applies if any part of an underlying transaction between the parties involves interstate commerce, a standard that the Supreme Court has interpreted broadly.7 Well-written arbitration agreements that expressly state the FAA applies to the parties' relationship can provide further support for invoking the FAA. Businesses should be aware, however, of other state and federal court decisions that have carved out exceptions to the United States Supreme Court's arbitration jurisprudence. The California Supreme Court's decisions in Iskanian v. CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC, 59 Cal. 4th 348 (2014) and McGill v. Citibank, N.A., 393 P.3d 85 (Cal. 2017), and the Ninth Circuit's decisions in Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail N. Am., Inc., 803 F.3d 425 (9th Cir. 2015) and Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc., 928 F.3d 819 (9th Cir. 2019), raise certain complexities when seeking to enforce arbitration agreements and class action waivers in the employment context and against certain types of claims.8

Steps to Take

Despite California's latest attempt to invalidate class action waivers in arbitration agreements, companies should continue to include arbitration provisions and class action waivers in their agreements. Businesses that have not previously included arbitration provisions and class action waivers in their terms and conditions, employment agreements, or other contracts with consumers or employees should consider doing so before the CCPA's January 1, 2020 operative date.

Businesses should also be aware that Concepcion and the subsequent line of arbitration-related cases still permit plaintiffs to raise generally applicable state law contract defenses when arguing that arbitration agreements are unenforceable. Businesses should ensure that their arbitration agreements and class action waiver provisions are carefully drafted with the complexities of applicable law in mind,9 so as to be best positioned to defend against any and all types of claims plaintiffs may seek to assert under the CCPA and other California consumer protection statutes.

Footnotes

1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 345 (2011).

2. Kindred Nursing Ctrs. Ltd. P'ship v. Clark, 137 S. Ct. 1421 (2017).

3. 136 S. Ct. 463 (2015).

4. 139 S. Ct. 1407 (2019). For further discussion of the Lamps Plus decision, see our client alert here.

5. 61 Cal. 4th 899, 924 (2015).

6. Id. at 923-24. In McGill v. Citibank, N.A., 393 P.3d 85 (Cal. 2017), however, the California Supreme Court held that an agreement purporting to waive a party's right to seek "public injunctive relief" in any forum is unenforceable under California law. Though we believe McGill was wrongly decided and that the rule set forth in that case should be preempted by the FAA, the Ninth Circuit recently held in Blair v. Rent-A-Center, Inc., 928 F.3d 819 (9th Cir. 2019), that the FAA does not preempt California's McGill rule. For more information, see our blog post discussing Blair in further detail.

7. See Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U.S. 265 (1995).

8. For further discussion, see our client alert on Blair here.

9. For example, see Blair, footnote 8, and the other California Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit cases discussed therein.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions