United States: Tom Barker Testifies Before Energy & Commerce On Medicaid DSH

Last Updated: June 13 2019
Article by Thomas Barker

On June 4, 2019, the House of Representatives' Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, held a hearing entitled "Investing in America's Health Care." Among other topics covered at the hearing was the future of the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payment system, a topic that we have written about in the past. Unless Congress acts, Medicaid DSH payments will be cut by $4 billion on October 1, as mandated by the Affordable Care Act. But the Congress is considering legislation that would delay or repeal the cuts in their entirety.

At Tuesday's hearing, one of our Medicaid and the Law bloggers was invited to testify at the hearing. His testimony follows.

Chairwoman Eshoo, Dr. Burgess, and members of the Subcommittee:

INTRODUCTION

Thank you for the opportunity to appear before the Subcommittee today. Thirty-eight years ago this week, I started my first job on Capitol Hill, as an intern, in this building. I could have never imagined, as I was walking into the Rayburn Building from the Capitol South Metro that morning, that I would one day have the honor of appearing before this Committee, so thank you for this opportunity.

I would like to clarify at the outset that although I was recently appointed to MACPAC, I am not appearing today on behalf of the Commission. Rather, I am speaking to you today as a health care lawyer with many years' experience representing both the government (as the chief legal officer of CMS and HHS) and health care providers and payers in private practice, and as a former professor of health care law and policy at George Washington University and Suffolk University School of Law.

I understand that the Subcommittee is in the process of considering the various Medicaid extenders that must be addressed by Congress before the end of this fiscal year. I would like to focus on one extender in particular: the disproportionate share hospital cuts that were enacted as a part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or the ACA, in 2010. I thought it might be helpful to provide a bit of perspective on the original policy behind DSH payments overall, changes that Congress made to DSH policy to curtail perceived financing abuses in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and the DSH cuts that were enacted in the ACA. I think it is important to understand that the ACA policy was not enacted in isolation; it was part of a decades-long history in addressing the situation of hospitals that treat low-income, uninsured, and Medicaid patients.

That history may be helpful to the Subcommittee as it moves forward with an extenders package. This year, the Subcommittee is called on to address the fact that, absent Congressional action this year, Medicaid DSH payments will be cut by $4 billion this year and $8 billion per year starting in 2021 through 2025. I understand that there is general consensus among members of the Committee that the full $4 billion cut should not take effect in 2020. I hope that my testimony is helpful to the Committee as it considers an appropriate policy with regard to DSH payments.

HISTORY OF MEDICAID DSH POLICY

The original DSH policy in the Medicaid program was actually written in this room during the mark-up of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981. At the time, Congress was trying to provide more flexibility to States in setting Medicaid payment rates to hospitals. Prior to OBRA'81, States were generally required to pay hospitals on a reasonable cost basis. Congress, the Reagan Administration and the Governors felt that States should have more flexibility to design payment policies in Medicaid and so repealed the reasonable cost requirement. At the same time, Congress was also concerned that giving States carte blanche authority to set Medicaid payment rates could result in under-paying some hospitals, so Congress included language instructing that States take into account the needs of what became known as disproportionate share hospitals.

As passed by the House, OBRA instructed States to "take into account the special costs of hospitals whose patients are disproportionately Medicaid eligible or without third party coverage."1 The Senate modified this language slightly and instructed States to "take into ... account the atypical costs incurred by hospitals which serve a disproportionate number of low income patients."2 In other words, whereas the House focus was hospitals that treated a disproportionate number of Medicaid and uninsured patients, the Senate focus was more generally on hospitals that treated a disproportionate number of low income patients.

Ultimately, the Senate language prevailed in conference. However, the Conference Agreement went on to note that "public hospitals and teaching hospitals which serve a large Medicaid and low-income population are particularly dependent on Medicaid reimbursement, and are concerned that a State take into account the special situation that exists in these situations in developing their rates."3 The statutory language implementing this statement of Congressional intent now requires that a State plan for medical assistance "take into account ... the situation of hospitals which serve a disproportionate number of low-income patients with special needs."4

DSH CRITERIA AND CURTAILING THE USE OF PROVIDER TAXES AND DONATIONS TO OBTAIN THE STATE SHARE OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

Although Congress first imposed a DSH obligation on States in 1981, it wasn't until the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 that the Congress imposed specific statutory requirements that specified, with some precision, how States were required to implement the "take into account" requirement.5 Congress specified a minimum threshold for the types of hospitals that States were required to designate as DSH.6 Additionally, DSH payments do not count against a State's upper payment limit, thereby giving States more flexibility in developing a payment policy for DSH hospitals.7

This flexibility, however, created the opportunity for States to use provider taxes and donations that contained a hold-harmless feature to derive the State share of medical assistance expenditures. DSH expenditures exploded between fiscal year 1990, when the federal share of DSH funds was $1 billion, and 1992, when the federal share of DSH funds soared to $17.4 billion.8 Because Congress felt that some of these financing techniques were abusive, it enacted the Medicaid Voluntary Contribution and Provider-Specific Tax Amendments of 1991.9 Under this statute, a State is only permitted to derive its share of medical assistance via the use of provider taxes that are broad-based, uniform, and that do not contain a hold-harmless feature.10 The statute also imposed the first statewide limitation on DSH payments that was based on DSH payments made to a state in 1992.11

Shortly after Congress enacted the Provider Tax statute, it imposed an additional limitation on DSH payments. As part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Congress imposed a hospital-specific cap on DSH payments. Under the statute, DSH payments generally cannot exceed the costs that a hospital incurs in providing care to Medicaid patients and uninsured patients.12 Several years later, as part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, Congress further curtailed DSH by imposing a specific, State-by-State cap on DSH payments in statute.13 Because these caps are trended forward by inflation, the total amount of federal funds allotted for DSH in 2019 is $12.6 billion.14

ENACTMENT OF THE ACA

By the time that President Obama signed the ACA into law in 2010, there was a clear, nearly thirty-year history of DSH payments to hospitals. Although Congress had initially intended to give States broad flexibility to design a DSH payment mechanism, that flexibility began to be curtailed in 1987. That history, combined with the belief that the ACA was expected to result in a reduction of the uninsured due to the then-mandatory Medicaid expansion15 and the availability of tax credit subsidies for qualified health plans sold on an Exchange, led Congress to believe that a reduction in the DSH allotments was warranted.16

As initially enacted, the ACA called for a reduction in total DSH allotments of $500 million in 2014; $600 million in 2015 and 2016; $1.8 billion in 2017; $5 billion in 2018; $5.6 billion in 2019; and $4 billion in 2020.17 Since the enactment of the ACA, Congress has amended the DSH reduction statute multiple times; under current law, as noted above, the aggregate reductions to the DSH allotments will begin in 2020 with a reduction of $4 billion, increasing to $8 billion in 2024 and 2025. The DSH allotments would then return to their regular statutorily-assigned level in 2026.

OPTIONS TO ADDRESS PENDING REDUCTIONS

Congress, of course, has many options available to it to address the pending reduction of $4 billion. It could further delay the reductions; it could simply repeal the reductions; or it could phase them in and develop a new policy. Of course, these decisions must be made in the context of the federal budget deficit and the overall impact of federal and state DSH policy on safety net hospitals.

One option that Congress may wish to consider is adopting the recommendations that MACPAC proposed in March of this year. The MACPAC recommendations could be implemented on a budget neutral basis and phased in more gradually than scheduled under current law. The MACPAC recommendations contain three parts:

First, rather than applying a $4 billion reduction in 2020, the MACPAC recommendation would be a $2 billion reduction in 2020, $4 billion in 2021 (rather than $8 billion), $6 billion in 2022 (rather than $8 billion), and $8 billion per year in 2023 – 2029. Under current law, the DSH reductions end in 2025; under the MACPAC recommendations, they would extend for four additional years in order to achieve budget neutrality over the 10-year budget window.18

The second MACPAC recommendation would be to apply reductions to States with unspent DSH allotments before applying reductions to other States. Not all 50 States are using their full DSH allotments; under this recommendation, States with unspent DSH allotments would have their allotments reduced before reducing allotments to other States.

Finally, the third recommendation would be to direct CMS to revise the State-specific DSH caps to better align the relationship between the DSH allotments in a State and the number of low-income non-elderly individuals in that State (after adjusting for hospital costs, using the Medicare area wage index, in different geographic areas). The merit in this recommendation reflects the simple fact that the current DSH allotments relate back to the level of historic DSH spending in a particular State in the early 1990s. But that historic DSH spending may bear little or no relationship to the low-income non-elderly population in that State today. Revising the formula accordingly would better correspond to the original intent of the DSH program as enacted by Congress in 1981.

CONCLUSION

Madame Chairwoman, Dr. Burgess and members of the Subcommittee, thank you again for the opportunity to testify before you this morning. I would be pleased to make myself available to any of you or your staffs if you have any questions or would like further information.

Footnotes

1 House of Representatives, Committee on the Budget, Conference Agreement to Accompany the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, H. Rept. 97-208 (July 29, 1981) at 962.

2 Id.

3 Id.

4 Social Security Act § 1902(a)(13)(A)(iv).

5 Social Security Act § 1923.

6 Id. at subsection (b)(1). In general, a State must designate at least two categories of hospitals as DSH: first, any hospital with a low-income utilization rate (a fraction that reflects, in part, the amount of uncompensated care provided by the hospital) of at least 25%. Subsection (b)(1)(A). Second, any hospital with a Medicaid inpatient utilization rate greater than one standard deviation from the mean Medicaid utilization rate of hospitals in the State must be designated as DSH. Subsection (b)(1)(B).

7 42 C.F.R. § 447.272(c)(2).

8 Congressional Research Service, "Medicaid Disproportionate Share Hospital Payments" (June 17, 2016) at 2.

9 Pub. L. No. 102-234, 102nd Cong., 1st Sess., 105 Stat. 1793 (Dec. 12, 1991). The main provisions of the statute are codified at section 1903(w) of the Social Security Act.

10 Social Security Act § 1903(w)(3)(B),(C).

11 Pub. L. No. 102-234, supra n. 9, 105 Stat. at 1799 – 1802.

12 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 § 13621(b)(1), Pub. L. No. 103-66, 107 Stat. 312, 630 – 31 (Aug. 10, 1993). This requirement is codified at section 1923(g) of the Social Security Act. CMS implementation of this requirement is currently subject to litigation in multiple United States Courts of Appeal.

13 Balanced Budget Act of 1997 § 4721, Pub. L. No. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 511 – 12 (Aug. 5, 1997). The DSH caps are codified at section 1923(f) of the Social Security Act.

14 Medicaid and CHIP Payment Access Commission, "Improving the Structure of Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotment Reductions" at 4 (March, 2019) (hereafter, MACPAC DSH Recommendations).

15 In 2012, the Supreme Court, in a 7 – 2 decision, held that the mandatory ACA Medicaid expansion was unconstitutional. NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. 519, 575 – 88 (2012).

16 In addition to the reductions in the Medicaid DSH allotments, Congress also revised the Medicare DSH formula by holding back 75% of otherwise-payable Medicare DSH funds and re-distributing those funds based on a hospital's uncompensated care level. See Social Security Act § 1886(r)(2)(C).

17 Health Care Education and Reconciliation Act, Pub. L. No. 111-152 § 1203(a)(2), 124 Stat. 1029, 1053 – 55 (March 31, 2010). The reductions were codified (and now appear, in their current form) in section 1923(f)(7) of the Social Security Act.

18 According to the Congressional Budget Office, the MACPAC proposal would actually achieve budgetary savings ranging from $1 – $5 billion over the period. MACPAC DSH Recommendations, supra n. 14, at 8.

To view Foley Hoag's Medicaid and the Law blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions