State-chartered banks and non-banks alike face a challenging 50-state regulatory regime when offering interstate internet banking and financial services, which puts them at a competitive disadvantage when compared to national banks offering those same services under greater protection of federal preemption.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has proposed an initiative to allow certain types of non-bank entities, such as loan companies and money transmitters, to become national banks and gain the benefit of federal preemption to address this 50-state regulatory burden. That OCC plan is under attack in court. The states themselves have been among the most significant critics of the OCC's fintech initiative.
However, certain states are now looking into solutions to address the heavy burden of this 50-state regulatory regime on state-chartered banks and state-licensed fintech companies. The attached article focuses on potential solutions the states may pursue to address these challenging multi-state regulatory issues.
This article was published in the Consumer Finance Law Quarterly Report 2018, Volume 72, Number 3. This is a revised version of a 2017 post published to Thompson Coburn's Bank Check blog.
Greg Omer advises banking and financial services organizations on regulatory and corporate issues. He is a former bank and financial services regulator and speaks regularly to financial industry groups on regulatory issues.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
