United States: Real Estate Investment Policyholders Prevail In Delaware And New York D&O Coverage Disputes

New York and Delaware courts resolved two coverage issues in favor of directors and officers of real estate investment trust advisory companies in lawsuits against their liability insurers. Both decisions arise out of ongoing coverage disputes related to allegations of fraud and other wrongdoing in connection with accounting irregularities.

In Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Schorsch, et al., the New York trial court granted partial summary judgmentt for Nicholas Schorsch and other individual officers and directors insured under an excess directors and officers liability policy issued by Westchester to RCAP Holdings LLC. RCAP had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy pursuant to a restructuring agreement that created a supervised creditor trust for gathering and distributing RCAP's credit assets. The bankruptcy court confirmed the plan of reorganization, including authorizing the creditor trust to pursue litigation to further the interests of the bankruptcy estate.

The RCAP creditor trust later filed a lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty claims against RCAP and other individual defendants. RCAP and the individual insureds sought coverage under its D&O insurance policies. A separate federal action pending in New York subsequently settled, which exhausted $31 million in coverage under RCAP's primary policy and several excess policies. The next excess insurer in the program, Westchester, denied coverage based in part on the policy's insured versus insured exclusion, arguing that the exclusion prevented RCAP from recovering losses caused by its own officers and directors. RSUI adopted Westchester's position in the ensuing coverage litigation.

The individual insureds argued that the insured versus insured exclusion did not apply due to an exception for claims brought by a bankruptcy trustee or examiner, receiver, conservator, liquidator, or "other comparable authority." They asserted that the exclusion must be interpreted narrowly against the excess insurers, that "comparable authority" is ambiguous, and that construing the exclusion in their favor requires deeming the creditor trust a comparable authority because it is the functional equivalent of a creditor committee and was established to obtain funds for RCAP's creditors. The insurers countered that the creditor trust was not independent or disinterested in the same way that a bankruptcy trustee, receiver, or liquidator would be and cannot be construed as a comparable authority.

The court rejected the insurers' argument and agreed with the individual insureds. The court first recognized several fundamental contract interpretation principles, including that ambiguous policy language will be construed in favor of coverage, that exclusions will be construed narrowly and against the insurer, that the duty to defend is exceedingly broad, and that an insurer may only be relieved of its duty to defend if there is no possible factual or legal basis upon which it might be obligated to indemnify the insured. Applying these established principles, the court found that the phrase "comparable authority" was ambiguous and, therefore, had to be construed against the insurer, particularly since it was being invoked to restrict coverage.

In view of the ambiguous policy language, the court held that the insured versus insured exclusion did not apply and granted summary judgment in favor of the individual insureds. Moreover, because the insurers' © 2019 Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 2 duty to defend extended to all actions arising out of the covered occurrence and the excess insurers had forced RCAP to litigate its coverage claims by filing a declaratory judgment action, the court applied New York's Mighty Midgets rule to order that the insurers pay the insureds' coverage counsel's fees in defending against the declaratory judgment action.

The decision presents two takeaways. The first is that—given the insurer's burden of drafting clear exclusionary language—exceptions to exclusions may still carry the day even where a particular factual situation is not explicitly contemplated. Exclusions often include broader "catchall" items among lists of terms, which insurers often rely on to attempt to construe coverage narrowly. Where such catchalls appear in affirmative coverage grants or exceptions to exclusions, however, policyholders should consider whether analogous situations not expressly accounted for are nevertheless covered. In this instance, RCAP's creditor trust was not a trustee, receiver, or liquidator but functioned like a creditor's committee that could reasonably be considered a comparable authority not subject to the insured versus insured exclusion.

Another takeaway is that the insureds were able to recover their attorneys' fees in defending the declaratory judgment action initiated by the insurers. Not all jurisdictions have similar fee-shifting rules like those that applied under New York law, but policyholders should carefully examine the potential pros and cons of litigating coverage claims under applicable state law. For instance, New Jersey allows a successful claimant under an insurance policy to recover its coverage counsel's fees. The risk of having to pay for an insured's coverage counsel's fees may incentivize an insurer to resolve a coverage claim without having to incur the time and expense of litigating.

In the second lawsuit, AR Capital, et al. v. XL Specialty Insurance Co., et al., a related real estate investment trust entity, AR Capital, and several directors and officers (who were also parties to the Westchester and RSUI New York action), received a partial victory in keeping five D&O insurers in a coverage lawsuit filed in Delaware state court. The insureds sought declaratory relief and damages for anticipated losses and alleged that the insurers failed to meet their coverage obligations under separate insurance programs in connection with claims for losses arising from government investigations.

The insurers argued that the Delaware court lacked personal and subject matter jurisdiction and moved to dismiss. The D&O insurers also argued that the Delaware action should be stayed in favor of the insurers' preferred New York state court actions because those lawsuits were filed first and are entitled to deference over the "reactive lawsuit" filed in Delaware.

The court granted the motion to dismiss one group of insurers on jurisdictional grounds, but denied the D&O insurers' motion, allowing the Delaware action to move forward. The court noted that the New York actions and the Delaware action were filed one day apart and, therefore, the first-filed lawsuits were not entitled to any deference. The other factors relevant to forum selection did not require dismissal where the D&O insurers did not meet their burden of demonstrating overwhelming hardship.

It is unclear what the Delaware court would have done had the two sets of lawsuit not been filed almost contemporaneously, but the policyholders certainly benefited from filing a lawsuit a day after the insurers initiated the New York actions. Policyholders should consider all available options for resolving contested coverage claims, including understanding applicable state laws on coverage issues and recovery of coverage counsel fees and being prepared to quickly file a lawsuit in a favorable forum in the event that the claim cannot be resolved before litigation. Retaining experienced coverage counsel early on in the claim process can help in those efforts and mitigate the risk of being forced to fight an insurer's coverage denial in the insurer's preferred forum.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions