United States: Narrowly Tailored Credit Events: Proposed Changes To The Credit Derivatives Definitions And Preliminary Takeaways

Narrowly tailored credit events have emerged as one of the most controversial opportunistic CDS strategies in recent years, as we have been reporting in prior publications. In the cases of Codere, iHeart and Hovnanian, voluntary payment failures were criticized as artificial defaults not reflecting the "spirit" of the Credit Derivatives Definitions (the Definitions). In addition, the case of Hovnanian also resulted in a widely publicized market manipulation claim and criticism from regulators. 

Following the highly-publicized Hovnanian litigation and subsequent interest in the CDS market from regulators, the ISDA Credit Derivatives Steering Committee (Steering Committee) has proposed a change to the CDS contract intended to prevent artificial defaults (i.e., defaults that do not necessarily reflect a genuine inability of a Reference Entity to make a payment) from triggering the CDS contracts (the Proposal).

This alert describes the proposed change and provides some preliminary takeaways.

Proposed Change

The Proposal is relatively mild in scope, in light of the wide array of potential issues and modifications considered by the Steering Committee over the past several months. The Proposal works what is essentially a subtle change to the definition of the Failure to Pay Credit Event, by adding a requirement that the relevant payment failure result from or in a deterioration in creditworthiness or financial condition of the Reference Entity. Specifically, the definition of Failure to Pay would provide that:

"It shall not constitute a Failure to Pay if such failure does not directly or indirectly either  result from, or result in, a deterioration in the creditworthiness or financial condition of the  Reference Entity.

The Proposal recognizes that this approach introduces an element of subjectivity, which in turn may create some level of uncertainty in the determinations process. It may be difficult to say with complete assurance that a payment default did, or did not, result from or in the deterioration in creditworthiness or financial condition of the Reference Entity. This uncertainty is in fact desired by the Steering Committee, since it was felt (and the interpretive guidance explains) that uncertainty over whether an arrangement will lead to a credit event for CDS contracts would reduce the incentive to create a narrowly tailored payment default.

In an effort to provide some clarity on how the new criterion should be applied, the proposed change comes with interpretive guidance setting forth the purpose of the credit deterioration requirement and a nonexhaustive list of factors that should be taken into account in making a determination. These factors are intended to be binding not only on the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee (the DC) when considering Failure to Pay credit event requests, but also on market participants in purely bilateral matters.

Also, importantly, the Proposal would establish a presumption that the credit deterioration requirement is satisfied unless "Eligible Information" sufficient to overcome that presumption is available. 

Interpretive Guidance

The interpretive guidance requires a causal link between the credit deterioration and the potential Failure to Pay. This causal link may exist where the Failure to Pay results directly or indirectly from a credit deterioration, or where such credit deterioration results directly or indirectly from such Failure to Pay.

To aid with this determination, the interpretive guidance sets out certain factors the DC should take into account when considering a narrowly tailored Failure to Pay. These factors are only indicators of whether a deterioration in creditworthiness is implicated (or not), and are not intended to be exhaustive or conclusive.

Factors suggesting that the credit deterioration requirement has not been met include:

  • The payment failure arises directly from an arrangement with a third party with a principal intention of creating a benefit for CDS contracts. The interpretive guidance notes that this factor may not be probative where the issuer may be seeking to break basis trades, as discussed below.
  • The Reference Entity's agreeing to issue or incur a new debt obligation which is likely to be the "cheapest-to-deliver" Deliverable Obligation, or a material amount of additional debt obligations that would constitute Deliverable Obligations in an Auction.
  • The nonpayment not resulting in the Reference Entity's other debt obligations generally being accelerated or becoming capable of being accelerated.
  • The Reference Entity having access to sufficient liquidity to meet its debt obligations as they were scheduled to come due, and the absence of Eligible Information that such nonpayment had a technical, administrative or operational cause.
  • The nonpayment is deemed promptly cured following the expiry of the relevant grace period, including a grace period deemed to apply under the Definitions.
  • The nonpayment relating only to debt obligations held by affiliates or other persons not likely to accelerate or take enforcement action. (This factor is also qualified by a sympathetic inclination towards breaking basis trades.)

Factors suggesting that the credit deterioration requirement has been met include:

  • The Reference Entity's being in financial distress and/or sought to restructure its debt obligations (including seeking arms-length forbearance agreements from creditors) prior to the nonpayment occurring.
  • Appointment of restructuring and/or insolvency advisors.
  • The nonpayment occurring pursuant to the terms of a creditor process that is overseen by or approved by a court or independent insolvency official.
  • The nonpayment occurring because the Reference Entity was not able to refinance (including as a result of general market conditions or external factors) in order to meet its debt obligations when due.
  • The payment date on which the nonpayment occurred was a scheduled payment date under the terms of the debt obligation at the time such debt obligation was originally incurred; or, if such payment date was amended, it was amended well before the date such nonpayment occurred.
  • Any additional impact resulting from the payment failure such as (i) other debt obligations of the Reference Entity generally being accelerated or capable of acceleration; (ii) the Reference Entity's failure to make payments in respect of its other debt obligations and/or (iii) a bankruptcy of the Reference Entity.

The interpretive guidance does not directly address how the proposed credit deterioration requirement comports with the somewhat similar requirement applicable to Restructuring Credit Events. It remains to be seen whether the DC will look at credit rating declines and public filings indicating financial difficulty as creating a sufficient link between a payment failure and the creditworthiness of a Reference Entity. The wording of the Proposal indicates that the tests are different in scope and application and that those factors alone are not conclusive.

In this respect, the Proposal leaves open a variety of questions — for example, whether an engineered payment failure at a distressed (or even, simply, stressed) Reference Entity represents a bona fide Failure to Pay, albeit perhaps timed to optimize a restructuring package, or, alternatively, an artificial default that should be disregarded for the purposes of CDS. Questions like these may be an unavoidable consequence of the uncertainty desired by the Steering Committee. 

Forbearance Agreements

As noted above, the interpretive guidance mentions forbearance agreements as positive indicators that the credit deterioration requirement has been met. However, the interpretive guidance only favorably views forbearance agreements "entered into for bona fide commercial reasons." These are presumed by the Proposal to be those entered into with a majority of the external creditors by volume, on an arm's-length basis, and memorialized in a formal agreement. 

The interpretive guidance may underappreciate, however, the circumstances in which a forbearance agreement may arise. In particular, depending on how strictly the arm's-length requirement will be applied, certain legitimate forbearance agreements may not qualify. Requiring participation of a majority of creditors by volume may also prove problematic. Where a Reference Entity has multiple obligations, it would be entirely possible that a forbearance arrangement would only be necessary in respect of certain of those obligations, which may happen to be closely held. These and other indicative criteria suggested under the Proposal would seem to inject a fair amount of uncertainty into the DC's determinations and will add pressure on the DC to use its discretion wisely.

Eligible Information

It remains to be seen what the DC will consider sufficient information to overcome the presumption that the Credit Deterioration Requirement has been satisfied. The interpretative guidance provides that statements made by the Reference Entity will be taken into account, although they will not be determinative. This will likely promote public relations activism by market participants to achieve the outcome they desire. They might, for instance, seek to advance their positions via media outlets, as has been observed in recent cases, or take a more direct route by influencing or controlling the Reference Entity's own disclosures. Public disclosure requirements in the jurisdiction of the Reference Entity might also be manipulated to influence the decision of the DC.1 A carefully crafted disclosure by a Reference Entity supporting a Failure to Pay determination in accordance with the relevant factors may be difficult to overcome, unless there is a clear indication of collusion between the Reference Entity and one or more market participants. In any event, the DC will have to consider potentially divergent pieces of information, which will likely complicate its task and extend the time it will take the DC to make a determination.

Breaking Basis Trades

In the context of a debt restructuring, a company may have to engage with bondholders who are flat or who short the company on a net basis as a result of their CDS positions. These basis traders often have different priorities than the net long bondholder/lender group. It is not uncommon for restructuring negotiations to make little progress until such time as the CDS contract is triggered and settled. Thereafter, the remaining bondholders should be incentivized to participate in an out-of-court restructuring. Recognizing that one approach to dealing with basis traders is for the Reference Entity to simply default on its payment obligations, the guidance provides that organized payment failures designed to break the basis trades and facilitate a restructuring should not disqualify a Failure to Pay Credit Event.

Implementation and Consultation

As with other changes to ISDA contracts, the proposed changes would be effected via a protocol. ISDA would also publish a new version of the physical settlement matrix, which would incorporate the proposed changes into all CDS contracts referencing the amended matrix.

ISDA is soliciting feedback on the Proposal from market participants. The consultation period is open, and any feedback must be submitted to ISDA by Wednesday, March 27, 2019.

Main (Preliminary) Takeaways

  • Narrowly tailored credit events have been one of the most controversial issues facing the credit derivatives market in recent history. The Steering Committee has evidently taken the view that unhindered proliferation of engineered defaults is not beneficial for the CDS marketplace. That said, the Proposal injects subjectivity into the DC's determinations process and thereby would create a fair amount of uncertainty for market participants.
  • It is unclear how much weight the DC will give to critical market indicators such as credit ratings and public recognition of financial difficulty. For example, a similar credit deterioration test in the Restructuring Credit Event definition was tested at External Review in the Cemex case. The External Review Panel in that case viewed public statements by the Reference Entity and ongoing credit rating downgrades as confirmation that a credit deterioration had occurred. However, the Steering Committee's apparent discomfort with the Codere and iHeart events, and the wording of the Proposal, would suggest that the DC may afford less weight to these indicators in the context of a Failure to Pay.
  • Using its discretion under the Proposal, the DC may question, and perhaps decline to make, a credit event finding regarding certain voluntary but less offensive engineered defaults, such as defaults designed for breaking basis trades. Indeed, breaking basis trades appears to have been one of the intended consequences of the Failure to Pay in Codere and iHeart, which have become poster children for CDS reform. How Codere would be decided under the Proposal is uncertain. Reference Entities and market participants in these circumstances may therefore be motivated to inject tendentious information into the market to influence determinations of the DC.  While the DC strives to source quality information to support its determinations, there have been instances where such tendentious information has formed a significant portion, if not all, of the publicly available information with respect to a credit event.
  • Consideration of breaking basis trades raises another issue. It is likely that many of the determinations the DC will be asked to make under the Proposal will involve some interplay between bond/loan and CDS positions. Distinguishing between breaking a basis trade vs. enabling certain market participants to inappropriately profit from artificial defaults may prove difficult. There is frequently a substantial number of basis package holders involved in a credit, such that the DC will be under pressure to make a determination that reflects reasonable market expectations. If it fails to do so, the DC would risk undermining the utility of the CDS product for the bondholder constituency holding the bonds on basis.
  • We would also expect the proposed change to engender heightened participant activism in the CDS market. In relatively complex credit events over the past two years, market participants have increasingly been submitting (or attempting to submit) information to the DC. The information submitted has included not only debt documentation and press articles, but also extensive analysis of the Definitions and contractual terms at issue. Going forward, such advocacy may be expected to focus on the new interpretive guidance, which may serve as a framework for future analytical submissions to the DC.
  • Finally, the appetite of market participants for the Proposal remains to be seen. Market participants may disfavor the additional discretion and subjectivity injected into the DC determinations process because of the added uncertainty that this entails. On the one hand, uncertainty may have the effect of deterring aggressive market participants from promoting narrowly tailored credit events. On the other hand, more traditional market participants may favor clear-cut rules, and for them the marginal benefit of preventing episodic engineered credit events may be outweighed by the disruptive consequence of a vague rule set. What is certain is that the Steering Committee will need to garner widespread support for the Proposal, from all corners of the market, if it hopes to drive adherence to the proposed change. Whether this is achievable remains to be seen.


1 This may be of particular significance in non-U.S. markets, where the public disclosure requirements do not necessarily require a Reference Entity to publicly disclose information relating to these restructuring strategies.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions