United States:
After SAS Institute: A Shift In Patent Litigation Strategies
06 December 2018
Jones Day
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In its April 2018 decision in SAS Institute, Inc. v.
Iancu, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when conducting an
inter partes review, the U.S. Patent Office must determine
the patentability of each of the claims challenged by the
petitioner.
Jones Day partners Dave
Cochran and Matt Johnson explain how SAS
Institute reverses prior interpretations of the inter
partes review statute and discuss where it has already
affected litigation strategies for petitioners and patent
holders.
Listen to the podcast here. (Running time: 24:51)
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.