United States: New York State Department Of Labor Releases Final Guidance Just Ahead Of October 9, 2018 Compliance Deadline

Last Updated: October 5 2018
Article by Michael S. Arnold and Brie Kluytenaar

The wait is over. The New York State Department of Labor (DOL) just released its final guidance with respect to New York State's new anti-sexual harassment law. The release includes final templates for the model sexual harassment prevention policy, complaint form, and harassment prevention training program. In addition to these templates, the DOL has also released a revised Frequently Asked Questions guide, documents setting forth the minimum standards for sexual harassment prevention policies and training programs, a poster and a compliance toolkit.

The final guidance reflects some of the feedback the DOL received during the public comment period that ended a few weeks ago. Employers will be pleased with the guidance to an extent, as the DOL did backtrack in some areas, especially with respect to training deadlines. Employer frustration persists, though, as employers now have only a week to update and implement their new policies, and the DOL did not address employers' concerns regarding other key compliance issues. Most notably, the DOL:

  1. Confirmed that employers must implement new harassment prevention policies by October 9, 2018.
  2. Extended the deadline for training all employees from January 1, 2019 to October 9, 2019.
  3. Eliminated the requirement that new employees must be trained within 30 days.

We highlight some other important changes, considerations, and next steps for employers below.

1. Immediate Action Item: Employers Must Distribute Updated Sexual Harassment Prevention Policies No Later Than October 9, 2018.

The DOL softened its stance in several areas in its final template harassment prevention policy (and the accompanying FAQ), including by:

  • Removing the "Zero Tolerance" language that was included in the draft template policy. Zero tolerance typically signifies that an employee will be terminated regardless of the type of infraction. While the final template policy states that an employer will "not tolerate" sexual harassment, the elimination of the Zero Tolerance language confirms that employers retain the flexibility to investigate and determine appropriate remedial and/or disciplinary action according to the circumstances, including implementing corrective action that may fall short of termination.
  • Providing greater recognition to employer internal complaint procedures. The final template includes a slight revision to the language regarding employees' reporting options which suggests that employees should report, at least initially, potential wrongdoing using their employer's internal complaint procedures rather than external reporting procedures. While the final template policy still provides employees with the option to report their complaint to an external enforcement agency, it appears to cast this option as an alternative to internal reporting, rather than placing the two approaches on equal footing.
  • Recognizing that employers need more flexibility with respect to their investigations. While the final template policy still includes extensive language specifying the contours of employer investigations, it no longer sets an expectation that an employer will complete them in 30 days. Further, it confirms that employers will conduct the investigation confidentially, to the extent possible. The FAQ also confirms that employers may utilize their own investigation procedures, provided that their policy sets forth those procedures.
  • Eliminating the requirement that employers post their policy in the workplace. The draft guidance added a new posting requirement that required employers to post their entire policy "prominently in all work locations." The DOL has backtracked on this requirement and now encourages, but does not require, employers to post the policy or to notify employees where they can locate the policy. The DOL also released a poster that employers can post in the workplace confirming the existence of a policy and where employees (and non-employees) can locate it.
  • Modifying the retaliation section to align more with applicable law. The final policy makes a small but important change stating that retaliation is any action that "could discourage" rather than "would keep" a worker from coming forward to make or support a sexual harassment claim. While this doesn't track perfectly with applicable state and federal law, it moves the standard a lot closer. Further, the final template policy now recognizes that employees are not protected against retaliation if they intentionally file false complaints.

With the release of the final template policy now behind us, employers have mere days to come into compliance. In updating their policies, employers should ask themselves the following important questions:

  • Should I adopt a policy that covers discrimination and other types of harassment (e.g., race-based harassment)? While the DOL's policy focuses primarily on sexual harassment (namely because it was tasked with issuing a template to comply with a new anti-sexual harassment law), the final policy contains a footnote stating that harassment and/or discrimination on the basis of other protected categories beyond sex is also unlawful. In our view, this does not go far enough and employers should consider designing a comprehensive policy that prohibits discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment as one important component, particularly because the complaint and investigation procedures and prohibition against retaliation would apply to instances of discrimination and harassment generally just the same as they do to instances of sexual harassment.
  • Should I adopt a uniform policy covering workers in all states? Many employers have employees working outside of New York State. Should this extensive policy apply to these employees as well, even if compliance standards in other states are less stringent? Further, many New York State employers are also subject to New York City law, which has even more stringent compliance standards. Should employers revise this model policy to account for those more stringent standards or should employees in different locations be subject to different policies? We generally recommend that while this may not be possible in all cases, employers should strongly consider creating a uniform policy.
  • Where should my policy reside? Should employers incorporate the policy into their handbook or make it a standalone policy? For many employers, the convenience of keeping this policy in the employee handbook will prevail, since it streamlines distribution, tracking, and updating of documents as well as acknowledgment of receipt. However, some employers may already have a standalone policy and prefer to keep it that way, while for other employers, their circumstances may dictate separating the policy from the handbook. In the latter case, an employer may be in the process of updating an entire handbook which may not be ready for release before the October 9, 2018 deadline, and a standalone policy will serve as an appropriate stop-gap measure. For those employers that decide to distribute the policy electronically, the DOL requires employers to ensure that employees can print a copy for their own records. Further, as mentioned above, employers should consider posting a notice informing employees where their policy can be located (and can use or customize the DOL's model poster to do so).
  • Should I obtain acknowledgments of receipt? If the policy is contained in the handbook, typically the employer requires employees to sign off on the policy by specifically referencing it in the handbook acknowledgment. But if the employer shifts to using a standalone policy, obtaining an acknowledgment of receipt may be more challenging as it adds to the employer's administrative burden. While there is no statutory requirement to obtain a written acknowledgment (and the guidance confirms this), we recommend that employers still do so, whether in hard copy form or electronically, because it confirms that the employee is aware of and will abide by the policy, and it adds an additional layer of protection for employers in the event of any future discrimination or harassment proceeding.
  • How should my policy account for "non-employees"? If you recall, earlier this year New York State updated its anti-discrimination law (known as the Executive Law or New York State Human Rights Law) to make it illegal for an employer to permit sexual harassment of "non-employees" in its workplace. Based on this change, the DOL drafted a template policy equally to employees and non-employees, and in the policy it defined "non-employees" broadly.

    The problem with this draft, of course, was that only employees receive an employee handbook, and in any case, an employer cannot take disciplinary action against a non-employee; it could terminate an engagement or otherwise limit or end a business relationship, refuse a customer's patronage, or remove a visitor from its premises, but it could not terminate or suspend or otherwise affect a non-existent employment relationship. In our view, while the DOL attempts to address this issue, its final guidance does so inadequately.

    The DOL retained most of the language applying the policy to non-employees (in fact, it compounded the problem by going so far as to define non-employees as "employees" – yes, you read that correctly). However, the FAQ confirms that employers do not have to distribute their harassment prevention policies to non-employees. Instead, it encourages employers to distribute or otherwise post the policy in the workplace so that non-employees can see it. This latter portion of the guidance makes sense to us. Given the change in the law, employers have every incentive to inform their non-employee relationships that they will not tolerate discrimination and harassment by non-employees against their employees, and likewise, against non-employees by their employees.

    Therefore, employers may tailor their policies accordingly for their employees, but should otherwise consider whether and how to alert their non-employee relationships about their strict prohibitions against discrimination and harassment in the workplace. Employers should consider doing this via posting in areas where non-employees traffic and/or by including an appropriately-tailored policy in engagement materials and/or vendor contracts.
  • Can I tailor my investigation procedures differently than the model policy? Yes. The FAQ notes that employers may use procedures that are similar, but not identical to, the investigation procedures set forth in the final template policy. Obviously those procedures must meet the minimum standards set forth by the DOL, but employers are assured greater flexibility under the final guidance. While employers do not have to include the extensive detail regarding investigations that the final template includes, their policies should outline their investigative approach.

2. Immediate Action Item: Update the Complaint Form and Make it Available No Later Than October 9, 2018.

The DOL left the model complaint form largely unchanged, although there a couple of notable revisions, including that:

  • Employers need not append the complaint form to the policy itself. Employers may instead reference the form and direct employees where to retrieve it (e.g., on the employer's intranet), thereby providing employers with administrative flexibility. For some employers, appending the complaint form to a standalone policy or at the end of the handbook is administratively feasible or even preferable; for others, the preference will lie with referencing the form in the policy and directing employees to retrieve it from Human Resources, a designated person, or through electronic means.
  • The complaint form invites employees to disclose whether they have engaged counsel. The final form eliminated questions regarding whether an employee has already filed a charge or complaint with an administrative agency, filed a lawsuit, and/or hired an attorney with respect to the complaint. Instead, the DOL replaces those questions with a statement inviting the employee to disclose the contact information of any retained counsel.
  • The complaint form indicates that the investigation should be kept confidential to the extent possible. This was a much-needed revision from the draft form, which allowed an employee to request confidentiality. Employers should remember that they cannot guarantee wholesale confidentiality as this could impede the investigation, and should address this distinction in their own form if they opt to use one.

One final note on the complaint form: like the policy template, it is limited only to complaints of sexual harassment. But employers should consider customizing the complaint form to apply to any type of discrimination and harassment, not just sexual harassment.

3. Future Action Item: Employers Must Train All Employees No Later Than October 9, 2019.

The DOL's final guidance answered some of the most pressing questions on employers' minds since the release of the draft guidance; specifically:

  • By when do I need to conduct training? No later than October 9, 2019.

    In a stunning reversal from the timeline set forth in the draft guidance, the final guidance now indicates that employers have one year (and a day) to complete the annual training cycle, or until October 9, 2019. The draft guidance had set a much earlier deadline of January 1, 2019. This reversal is consistent with the annual training period set forth in the law, and in shifting its stance, the DOL appears to have recognized the legitimate operational challenges most employers would have faced in meeting a year-end deadline (especially for employers who already conducted training sessions earlier this year in the wake of the #MeToo movement).

    This is also a significant development for employers covered by New York City's new anti-sexual harassment law. New York City's separate first annual training cycle goes into effect on April 1, 2019. While the City Commission has not yet released guidance informing employers by when they must complete that cycle, at the very least, this development better positions employers covered by both laws to wait until at least April 1, 2019 to conduct training so they may satisfy both the NYS and NYC's training requirements simultaneously, rather than forcing them to conduct training at two different points in time. (We note again, however, that we have not yet heard from the City Commission on this issue, and forthcoming guidance may change the analysis.)

    In setting a training date, employers should give due consideration to conducting it during a time or times when it will least disrupt their operations, and where every employee will be able to attend, particularly as the guidance indicates that there are no exceptions to an employer's obligation to train all of its NYS employees. For example, if an employer schedules training when employees may be away on vacation (i.e. in late August or December), it may leave them unable to satisfy their compliance obligations. Employers should also consider whether and how to discipline employees who fail to attend a training session.
  • Do I Still Need to Train All New Hires Within 30 Days? No.

    Fortunately, the DOL backtracked on its 30-day new hire requirement – a requirement found nowhere in the law itself. Instead, the final guidance encourages employers to train new employees as soon as possible given that the anti-harassment laws apply to them on day one of their employment. While this is another welcome development, employers covered by the New York City law must remember that they are subject to a 90-day new hire training requirement.
  • Who Do I Have to Train? Essentially all employees providing services in New York.

    In the draft guidance we noted that the DOL took an expansive view that basically any employee who performed services at any time for the employer in New York had to receive training. More specifically, the draft guidance provided the following Q&A:

    Q: What about temporary / transient employees? If someone just works for one day for the employer, or if someone works for just one day in NY?

    A: Employers are required to ensure that all employees receive training.

    The final guidance eliminated this particular Q&A, but replaced it with an equally disconcerting one. Now it reads:

    Q. I am an employer based in New York State but also have employees who only work in other states. Do they need to be trained as well?

    A. No. Only employees who work or will work in New York State need to be trained. However, if an individual works a portion of their time in New York State, even if they're based in another state, they must be trained.

    What does "will work" mean? That we reasonably anticipate that one day they'll step foot in New York to perform services? What does a "portion of their time" mean? More than 20%? More than 50%? More than one day? What if an employee is traveling on business for just a one-week project? What if the employee is coming in for an employer-sponsored event in New York? Hopefully, the DOL will revisit this issue in the future in a way that lessens the burden on employers, including the cost. (One can imagine a scenario where the cost to train a temporary employee onsite for just a day actually exceeds his or her wages related to the services performed.) Until the DOL revisits this issue, employers may want to err on the side of caution and provide training to any employee providing services in New York, even if they are providing such services on limited basis.

    Two additional, but related points. First, the final guidance does confirm that employers can satisfy their training obligations for temporary employees by verifying completion of the training by the temporary help firm. Second, the final guidance confirms that employers are not required to train non-employees. So no, as we've been asked repeatedly, you do not have to train the UPS delivery driver. In both cases however, employers should take steps to, among other things, ensure that these individuals are receiving adequate training before permitting them to provide services to or otherwise engage in a relationship with the employer.

    For example, employers will want to ensure that the temporary help firm or contractor they engage is familiar with their prohibitions against sexual harassment and that they have provided their employees or have themselves received legally sufficient training before services can be performed. For those non-employees where this may not be possible (i.e., for certain visitors that come onto your premises), employers should, as mentioned above, consider posting a sign that alerts the non-employee to the employer's prohibition against sexual harassment and their ability to complain.
  • Do I Really Have to Provide the Training in a Language Other Than English? Yes, kind of.

    Other than learning that employers had only about 180 hours to update their harassment prevention policies, the other biggest disappointment in the final guidance was the DOL's confirmation of a multilingual training requirement.

    In the draft guidance and now in the final guidance, the DOL takes the position that employers must "provide employees with training in the language that is spoken by their employees" and further, they must provide policies in that language. This appears to mean a language that is the employee's "primary language." The DOL promises to make materials available in other languages, but states that employers may provide training and policies in English only if such materials are unavailable (although it strongly urges employers to train in other languages anyway because, the DOL says, employers can still be liable for the conduct of their employees).

    As best we can tell, this requirement is aimed at making sure employees learn about an employer's policies and efforts to protect against sexual harassment in the workplace in a language they can actually understand – an admirable policy aim. But the DOL gives short shrift once again to employers' operational realities (including the costs of satisfying this requirement), and likely will limit an employer's appetite to conduct live, in-person training – the most effective type of training towards preventing sexual harassment in the workplace.

    Perhaps most disconcerting is the fact that the DOL does not provide any guidance around the requirement to provide training in another language where only a few employees speak a "primary language" other than English. What's an employer to do who wants to conduct live, in-person training? Are they supposed to hire a translator, who will make it far more expensive and slow down the delivery of the training program? That's not realistic. Does the employer scrap this type of training in favor of a pre-packaged, easily translatable, but perhaps less effective training module? Does the employer maintain the live, in-person training, but send the non-primary English speakers to separate training, which raises its own set of issues?

    At this point, short of additional guidance, we recommend that employers take a practical approach here, and consider the needs of their particular workforce in light of the DOL's position that employers are ultimately responsible for ensuring that employees are trained in these policies. We recommend that employers with multilingual populations consult with counsel regarding their obligations to provide training in other languages.
  • How do I satisfy the "Interactive" training requirement? You have options.

    The final guidance confirms that employers may conduct training with a live or in-person trainer, or it may do so online. In the latter case, to make it interactive, it must include "questions at the end of a section and the employee must select the right answer;" or "the employees have an option to submit a question online and receive an answer immediately or in a timely manner." In the former case, to make it interactive, the trainer "asks the employees questions or gives them time throughout the presentation to ask questions." In both cases, the training programs must allow for feedback from the employee to turn in after the session to qualify as interactive.

    The guidance also notes that:

    1. The employer may provide the training to employees individually or in groups, in person, via phone or online; via webinar or recorded presentation; and
    2. There is no recommended or mandated specific duration of time for the mandatory training sessions (e.g., 90 minutes or 2 hours, etc.).
    Thus, employers will have to determine a format and running time that effectively covers the minimum training standards set forth by the DOL and demonstrates a real commitment to eliminating sexual harassment in the workplace, while still being mindful of their operations and employees' time constraints.
  • Do I have to use any particular materials in delivering the training? The DOL mostly left intact its original guidance here. The DOL has provided a "script" and an accompanying PowerPoint presentation that employers may utilize (and it promises to later release a video), but employers may customize their programs accordingly, and the DOL encourages them to do just that. We recommend that employers use the "script" and PowerPoint presentation – which address sexual harassment only – as a starting point and strive to do more with their training programs by adopting an appropriately-customized live or web-based program that:

    • Trains employees regarding the employer's policies prohibiting discrimination and harassment and retaliation in the workplace more generally and not just around sexual harassment;
    • Satisfies the training requirement under other applicable laws to the extent possible. For example, employers subject to both the NYS and NYC anti-harassment laws must be mindful that the NYS law differs slightly from the NYC law, and any training program must account for these differences. By way of illustration, employers subject to the NYC law would have to incorporate "bystander intervention" training into their program and employers looking to satisfy both of those jurisdiction's laws in one training session would have to customize their program accordingly.
    • Addresses the nuances of the employer's business, the industry in which it operates more generally, and modern workplace dynamics. For example, the model program includes six "case studies" which present hypothetical scenarios illustrating the concepts in the training, along with questions for discussion. However, these case studies may not be appropriate or effective for all workplaces, and employers should consider creating their own customized case studies, as employees may gain more from discussing examples that are more closely related to their own work environment. For example, employees may be better served by discussing hypotheticals that present the use of social media to harass another employee or that account for more subtle forms of discrimination or harassment.
    • Accounts for the different expectations and responsibilities of supervisors, managers, and employees around sexual harassment in the workplace. While the model training does not differentiate between training delivered to management and employees, employers should consider conducting separate training sessions for management and employees whereby they will, among other things, customize the messages or frame certain issues differently to account for the different audiences. In the case of management, employers should strongly consider tailoring their programs to ensure that they receive adequate training on their responsibilities to model behavior, detect and report misconduct, and protect against retaliation.
    • Demonstrates buy-in from the top. Employers should consider how best to incorporate their executive leadership in rolling out the new training and policies, to take advantage of the opportunity to increase employee engagement, build morale, and emphasize that the initiative is being taken seriously from the top down.

* * * * *

With the compliance deadline just around the corner, Mintz's employment attorneys are standing by to assist you.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions