On 6 April 2018 the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added 24 Russian individuals and 14 companies to its list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). The US based assets and property of these SDNs are now frozen and US-persons are prohibited from having any dealings with them. Non-US persons could also face enforcement action if they engage in "significant" transactions with any sanctioned Russian entity, under enhanced secondary sanctions.

Who has been designated?

The new designations cover 17 Russian government officials, two state-owned companies, seven oligarchs and 12 of the companies they own. The list is not exhaustive. Under OFAC's "50% rule", any company owned 50% or more (whether directly or indirectly) by an SDN or combination of SDNs, is itself designated. Therefore firms engaged in Russian business should conduct sufficient due diligence to determine the ultimate ownership of their counterparties in order to be certain that they are not dealing with a counterparty which is indirectly covered by US sanctions.

Of particular note amongst the new SDNs is the inclusion of the heads of three of Russia's largest state-owned companies, Gazprom, Gazprombank and VTB Bank. However the companies themselves have not been added to the SDN list.

How do the sanctions apply to non-US persons?

The Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA) contains secondary sanctions aimed at discouraging non-US persons from dealing with certain Russian entities. Non-US persons who knowingly facilitate "significant" transactions for or on behalf of such entities risk having their US-property and assets frozen.

When determining whether someone has "facilitated" a transaction, OFAC will take a wide view, with official FAQs stating that:

facilitating a significant transaction for or on behalf of a person will be interpreted to mean providing assistance for a transaction from which the person in question derives a particular benefit of any kind (as opposed to a generalized benefit conferred upon undifferentiated persons in aggregate). Assistance may include the provision or transmission of currency, financial instruments, securities, or any other value; purchasing, selling, transporting, swapping, brokering, financing, approving, or guaranteeing; the provision of other services of any kind; the provision of personnel; or the provision of software, technology, or goods of any kind.

The legislation itself does not spell out what is meant by a "significant" transaction. However OFAC has provided a list of seven factors it will take into account in determining whether a transaction is "significant":

  1. the size, number, and frequency of the transaction(s);
  2. the nature of the transaction(s);
  3. the level of awareness of management and whether the transaction(s) are part of a pattern of conduct;
  4. the nexus between the transaction(s) and a blocked person;
  5. the impact of the transaction(s) on statutory objectives;
  6. whether the transaction(s) involve deceptive practices; and
  7. such other factors that the Secretary of the Treasury deems relevant on a case-by-case basis.

OFAC has confirmed that these new measures apply to significant transactions with entities subject to Russian sectoral sanctions (SSIs), as well as with full-blown SDNs. Under the Russian sanctions regime there are two classes of sanctioned entities: SDNs and SSIs. SDNs face the most restrictive measures and are subject to asset freezes, whereas SSIs face less restrictive measure aimed at preventing them from raising money on western capital markets and undertaking certain types of business. The SSI list includes some of Russia's largest and most strategically significant companies.

It is important to note that, according to OFAC FAQs, a transaction with an SSI will only be considered "significant" if it involves deceptive practices. "Deceptive practices" are described as "attempts to obscure or conceal the actual parties or true nature of a transaction, or to evade sanctions". Nevertheless the prohibition on facilitating "significant" transactions for or on behalf of these businesses represents an important extension of the restrictions targeting SSIs. Activities with either an SDN or an SSI will not be considered significant if US persons would not require specific licenses from OFAC to participate in them. This includes where a US person could participate under the authority of one of the general licences which OFAC has published in relation to the new sanctions. At the time of writing, OFAC has published three general licenses: General License 12B, General License 13A and General License 14.

As relations between the US and Russia continue to deteriorate, we are likely to see further additions to the SDN list, particularly in areas such as energy, defence and finance. With the introduction of enhanced secondary sanctions, both US and non-US firms that deal with Russian counterparties will need to keep abreast of the latest developments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.