United States: DOJ Now Targeting HR Professionals For Criminal Antitrust Violations

Human capital (i.e. skilled labor) has become increasingly vital to the success of business enterprises. But such invaluable capital can also be extremely difficult to attract and retain, as corporate loyalty has become less of a two-way street and the gold ring of opportunity swings by. Most companies have witnessed critical employees jump ship to join competitors or newly-trained understudies put their expensive training to work for rivals who offer not only better and fairer financial rewards but often a more comfortable and civilized safe haven. Where permitted by state law, agreements between employers and employees can mitigate these inevitable disruptive and sometimes irreparably damaging contingencies. But some companies, finding such “vertical” non-compete agreements ineffective or inadequate, have resorted to “horizontal” arrangements with competitors to essentially hobble opportunistic employees. Aptly labeled no-poach and wage-fixing agreements, the most perilous of these agreements (a) inhibit companies from recruiting or hiring employees from competitors or (b) collectively set employee wages and terms of employment. Although tempting additions or alternatives to sometimes problematic non-compete agreements, these collusive arrangements may soon carry federal criminal penalties.

On January 19th, speaking at a conference hosted by the Antitrust Research Foundation, newly appointed Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division Makan Delrahim declared that the DOJ will be pursuing criminal charges for no-poach and wage-fixing arrangements. Delrahim commented: “We have been very active in [investigating no-poach and wage-fixing agreements]. I think over the coming couple of months, you will see some announcements. And to be honest with you, I’ve been shocked how many of these there are. But they’re real … [W]e are treating those … in certain circumstances as criminal.” So how do the antitrust laws apply to these arrangements and what can human resource professionals expect?

Labor Markets and the Antitrust Laws

Just as the Sherman and Clayton Antitrust Acts regulate anticompetitive conduct in product and service markets, they also apply to anticompetitive conduct in labor markets. As early as 1926, the Supreme Court read § 1 of the Sherman Act to prohibit agreements to collectively set wages. In Anderson v. Shipowners’ Association of Pacific Coast, the Court struck down an agreement, implemented by membership in “shipowners associations,” to fix prices among “substantially all” the owners of merchant vessels “engaged in … commerce among the ports of the Pacific Coast and with foreign countries.” Justice Sutherland, writing for the Court, held: “The associations fix the wages which shall be paid the seamen … If the restraint … had related to the carriage of goods in interstate and foreign commerce … the unlawful restraint would be clear. But ships and those who operate them are instrumentalities of commerce … no less than cargoes.”

Since the Anderson case, courts have refined the framework for analyzing no-poach and wage-fixing cases. They come in two flavors: naked restraints and ancillary restraints. Naked restraints are separate from or not reasonably necessary to a larger legitimate collaboration between employers. Ancillary restraints, on the other hand, are restrictions that are related to and reasonably necessary for a legitimate, procompetitive collaboration between employers. For example, an agreement not to recruit employees for a limited period after the sale of a subsidiary would be an ancillary restraint. The DOJ’s criminal enforcement initiative appears to focus on naked, not ancillary, restraints

Naked Restraints: Wage-Fixing

In 2007, the DOJ filed a civil complaint against a healthcare association that operated a nursing registry for conspiring to fix nurse wages. While originally established to monitor the quality of temporary nursing services, the DOJ alleged that the association went a bridge too far and used the registry to impose a uniform wage structure on participating staffing agencies. The association purportedly set wages by soliciting desired rate schedules from its member hospitals and averaging them to formulate a standard schedule. To ensure participation, member hospitals were required to use the registry whenever possible. Any hospital that purchased less than less than 50% of its temporary nursing requirements through the registry would be expelled from the association. The case ultimately settled when the parties signed a consent decree (a) requiring the association’s member hospitals to individually negotiate nursing rates and (b) prohibiting the association from mandating use of the registry. The consent decree also required the association to establish an antitrust compliance office and annually file an antitrust compliance report for 10 years from the date of execution of the consent decree. Further, it allowed for DOJ compliance inspections and interviews with the “officers, employees, agents, or other representatives [of the association]” upon written request.

In addition to such explicit wage fixing agreements, the DOJ and FTC have brought civil enforcement actions against companies for sharing competitively sensitive employment information. In 1994, the DOJ filed an antitrust case against a professional association of HR directors, a trade association of hospitals, and a number of member hospitals under § 1 of the Sherman Act for sharing employee compensation information about acute-care registered nurses. Using the professional and trade associations as conduits, the hospitals purportedly exchanged nonpublic, current and prospective information about nursing budgets, entry-level RN wages, and raise schedules in an attempt to counteract rising wages resulting from a labor shortage. Each hospital member purportedly used that information to set entry-level RN wages and to schedule raises. The parties settled by entering a consent decree with DOJ oversight prohibiting the sharing of compensation information except when (a) collected by a third party, (b) historic or current (not prospective) in nature, (c) limited to average compensation, (d) and aggregated to prevent identification of its origin. The decree also required that no single hospital’s data comprise more than 25% of the aggregate data.

Naked Restraints: No-Poach Agreements

In 2010 and again in 2012, the DOJ filed civil complaints against technology companies for no-poach agreements. In the 2010 case, two film studios allegedly agreed not to “cold call” each other’s digital animators or to make counteroffers when the other studio made an offer to a candidate. Similarly, in the 2012 case, executives of an online retailer allegedly verbally agreed with executives of a software developer not to proactively recruit each other’s computer engineers and scientists, despite internal correspondence purportedly indicating the companies were desperate to fill positions and identifying the other party to the agreement as having the most competent candidates. The DOJ filed Sherman Act § 1 claims against the parties to both agreements. The cases settled when the parties entered five-year consent decrees prohibiting further such agreements, requiring the companies to establish internal compliance programs with annual certification requirements, and allowing for DOJ inspections and interviews upon request.

Ancillary Restraints

Although there are potentially numerous types of ancillary restraints, a 2001 group boycott case decided by the Third Circuit provides an example of an ancillary restraint and demonstrates why they are unlikely to face criminal prosecution as new per se antitrust violations. In that case, a parent wireless services provider company agreed to sell its subsidiary telecommunications equipment manufacturer. As a part of the spinoff, the parent company agreed not to hire any employees of the subsidiary for eight months after the sale. The agreement was purportedly necessary to make the sale viable because “one of [the subsidiary’s] most marketable assets was its skilled employees.” Applying the rule of reason to determine whether the hiring restraint was reasonable, the Third Circuit noted “covenants not to compete executed upon the sale of a business to a third party are generally not recognized as antitrust violations” so long as they “are reasonable in scope.” Because the agreement’s “primary purpose … was to ensure the successful sale … which required workforce continuity,” the Third Circuit held the agreement was reasonable and dismissed the antitrust claim.

Down the Winding Road

Delrahim’s comments to the Antitrust Research Foundation are noteworthy because they signal a continuation by the Trump Administration of an Obama-era criminal enforcement policy targeting anticompetitive employment agreements. In 2016, the DOJ and FTC jointly issued “guidance for human resource professionals” that warned HR professionals that the DOJ could in its discretion file criminal charges for no-poach and wage-fixing agreements: “Going forward, the DOJ intends to proceed criminally against naked wage-fixing or no-poaching agreements. These types of agreements eliminate competition in the same irredeemable way as agreements to fix product prices or allocate customers, which have traditionally been criminally investigated and prosecuted as hardcore cartel conduct.”

Until now it was unclear whether the Trump-era DOJ would adopt the Obama-era policy embodied in the 2016 guidance. Delrahim has now clarified that no-poach and wage-fixing collusive agreements will remain a top priority at the Trump DOJ and will be prosecuted under both the civil and criminal antitrust laws. Further, Delrahim apparently intends to treat the Obama-era’s 2016 joint agency guidance as a safe harbor. In Delrahim’s words: “If [wage-fixing and no-poach] activity has not been stopped or continues from the time the [2016 guidance was issued], we will treat that as criminal.” Stay tuned.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions