United States: Global Anti-Corruption Insights: Summer 2017

Following a flurry of corporate settlements in the final days of the Obama Administration, enforcement of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) has been relatively quiet. In the first six months of the Trump Administration, neither the US Department of Justice (DOJ) nor the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced new charges against any company or entered into any deferred-prosecution or non-prosecution agreements with respect to FCPA violations. We suspected that the lull in enforcement actions would be short lived, however, as Trump Administration officials were quite open in expressing their commitment to vigorous enforcement of the FCPA. Our suspicions were confirmed in late July, when the SEC announced that it had resolved FCPA charges against Halliburton Company.

New DOJ officials also have extended the FCPA Pilot Program that was unveiled last year. In June, the DOJ announced two new "declinations" under the Program, which rewards companies for voluntary disclosure, cooperation, and remediation. Both declinations were contingent, however, on the companies disgorging profits from the conduct under question.

Meanwhile, criminal FCPA cases against individuals are proceeding apace. Judges recently have imposed prison sentences on defendants who have pleaded guilty to FCPA charges, and a Chinese developer accused of bribing United Nations officials was convicted by a Manhattan federal jury.

On the civil enforcement side, in June the US Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Kokesh v. SEC, holding that a five-year limitations period applies to disgorgement claims brought by the SEC. This ruling is likely to lead the SEC to expedite investigations and expand the use of tolling agreements, among other things.

Outside the United States, other countries are enforcing their own anti-corruption laws, as well as cooperating with US-led investigations. For example, the United Kingdom's Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has announced new charges and expanded investigations under the UK Bribery Act. In addition, Brazil, with its massive "Operation Car Wash" investigation into corruption involving the state-controlled oil company, continues to be a hotbed of enforcement activity. Mexico, for its part, recently implemented new anti-corruption legislation.

KEY DEVELOPMENTS IN THE UNITED STATES

I. CORPORATE ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS

SEC Settles FCPA Charges with Halliburton, Former Executive for $29.2 Million

On July 27, 2017, the SEC charged Texas-based Halliburton Company (Halliburton) with violating the books and records and internal accounting controls provisions of the FCPA in connection with winning lucrative oilfield services contracts from Angola's state oil company, Sonangol. According to the SEC, Halliburton made millions of dollars in payments to a local Angolan company owned by a former Halliburton employee who was a friend and neighbor of the Sonangol official responsible for awarding the contracts to Halliburton. Halliburton's contracts with the local Angolan company allegedly were intended to meet local content requirements rather than for the stated scope of work, and Halliburton's selection of and payments to the company allegedly circumvented internal accounting controls.

Without admitting or denying the charges, Halliburton agreed to an order requiring a settlement payment of approximately $29.2 million, including $14 million in disgorgement, $1.2 million in interest, and $14 million in penalties. Halliburton also agreed to the retention of an independent compliance consultant to oversee its anti-corruption policies and procedures in Africa. Without admitting or denying the SEC's claims, Halliburton's former vice president Jeannot Lorenz also agreed to pay a $75,000 penalty to settle charges that he caused the company's violations, circumvented internal accounting controls, and falsified books and records.1

Declinations Continue Under FCPA Pilot Program

On April 5, 2016, the DOJ launched a one-year pilot program in an effort to provide more transparency and consistency to the process of evaluating voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation, and remediation of FCPA violations. Following speculation about whether the DOJ would extend the pilot program under the new administration, Kenneth Blanco, acting assistant attorney general for the DOJ's Criminal Division, confirmed in March 2017 that the pilot program would "continue in full force" while the DOJ evaluates its utility and efficacy.2

The DOJ has issued two declinations under the pilot program so far this year:

  • CDM Smith Inc. (June 21, 2017) – The DOJ issued a declination letter to CDM, a privately held engineering and construction firm. The DOJ alleged that CDM and its wholly owned Indian subsidiary paid approximately $1.18 million in bribes to officials in India's state-owned highway management agency in exchange for highway construction supervision and design and a water project contract resulting in approximately $4 million in net profits. The declination was based on (1) CDM's timely, voluntary self-disclosure of the bribery scheme; (2) CDM's thorough and comprehensive investigation; (3) CDM's full cooperation; (4) CDM's agreement to disgorge to the DOJ all profits from the scheme; (5) CDM's enhancement of its compliance program and controls; and (6) CDM's remediation, including terminating employees involved in the scheme.3
  • Linde North America Inc. (June 16, 2017) – The DOJ issued a declination letter to Linde, an industrial gas supplier. The letter alleged that Linde, through a company it had acquired, paid bribes in the form of shared profits to officials at a Georgian state-owned technology company in exchange for being selected to purchase certain income-producing assets and equipment from the state-owned company. The scheme allegedly resulted in profits to Linde of approximately $1,430,000. The DOJ nevertheless declined to take enforcement action based on (1) Linde's timely, voluntary self-disclosure of the matter; (2) Linde's thorough and comprehensive investigation; (3) Linde's full cooperation; (4) Linde's agreement to disgorge all profits from the scheme; (5) Linde's enhancement of its compliance program and controls; and (6) Linde's remediation, including terminating employees involved in the scheme.4

Additional Declinations Announced This Year

In the first two quarters of 2017, the DOJ and SEC also declined to prosecute or pursue charges in a substantial number of cases not officially linked to the FCPA Pilot Program:

  • IBM Corp. (July 25, 2017) – IBM disclosed in a periodic report filed with the SEC for the second quarter of 2017 that in June 2017 it received letters from the DOJ and SEC closing FCPA investigations without any enforcement action. IBM had notified the SEC in early 2012 that the Polish Central Anti-Corruption Bureau was investigating allegations of illegal activity by a former IBM Poland employee in connection with sales to the Polish government. IBM later learned in 2013 that the DOJ was also investigating allegations related to the Poland matter, as well as allegations relating to transactions in Argentina, Bangladesh, and Ukraine.5
  • Newmont Mining (July 25, 2017) – Newmont, a gold mining company, disclosed that in June 2017 the DOJ issued a declination letter advising the company that it did not intend to recommend an enforcement action in connection with an FCPA investigation involving activities outside the United States. Earlier this year, the company disclosed that in February 2017 it received a declination letter from the SEC.6
  • Platform Specialty Products (May 9, 2017) – Platform Specialty, a chemicals production company, announced the conclusion of an investigation into Arysta, a company Platform Specialty had acquired. Platform Specialty disclosed in SEC filings that the DOJ and SEC had closed their investigations into certain payments Arysta had made to third-party agents related to Arysta's government tender business in West Africa.7
  • Harris Corporation (May 3, 2017) – Harris, a global communications company, disclosed in a quarterly filing that the DOJ declined to take action against the company related to an FCPA investigation arising from Harris' acquisition of CareFx Corp. in 2011. The SEC previously issued a declination to Harris in September 2016, though it brought charges against the former head of CareFx's Chinese subsidiary for giving gifts to Chinese government officials in exchange for $9.6 million in contracts.8
  • Innodata Inc. (March 8, 2017) – In its annual report, Innodata, a global digital services company, disclosed that both the SEC and DOJ had closed investigations into potentially improper payments made by a foreign subsidiary in connection with the inspection of the subsidiary's compliance with local employment-related tax requirements.9
  • Merck & Co., Inc. (February 28, 2017) – In its annual report, Merck disclosed that the SEC recently had closed an FCPA investigation involving, broadly, "activities in a number of countries." The DOJ previously had closed a parallel inquiry.10
  • Crawford & Co. (February 27, 2017) – Crawford, a claims management company, disclosed in its annual report that after having voluntarily self-reported a potential FCPA violation to the SEC and DOJ in 2015, it learned in the first quarter of 2017 that the SEC had concluded its investigation and did not intend to recommend an enforcement action against Crawford.11
  • Cobalt Int'l Energy, Inc. (February 9, 2017) – Having previously received a declination from the SEC in January 2015, Cobalt announced in a press release that the DOJ had closed an FCPA investigation into an alleged connection between senior Angolan government officials and an Angolan company with which Cobalt had partnered.12

Odebrecht S.A. Sentenced to Pay $2.6 Billion Fine by Federal Judge Following Reduction Based on Analysis of Ability to Pay

On April 17, 2017, Judge Raymond Dearie of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York sentenced Brazil-based construction company Odebrecht S.A. (Odebrecht) to pay a criminal fine totaling $2.6 billion for conspiring to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA, with $93 million of that amount going to the United States, $2.39 billion going to Brazil, and $116 million going to Switzerland.13

In December 2016, both Odebrecht and its US-based petrochemical unit, Braskem S.A., pled guilty to conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA.14 According to the DOJ, Odebrecht paid approximately $788 million in bribes to government officials in 12 countries through a network of shell companies, off-book transactions, and off-shore bank accounts to win business during a period of more than 15 years.15 To resolve the charges, Braskem entered into a plea agreement in which the company agreed to a total criminal penalty of $632 million,16 while Odebrecht agreed to a $4.5 billion global settlement with US, Brazilian, and Swiss authorities. Odebrecht represented, however, that it was only able to pay approximately $2.6 billion in criminal fines. As part of the settlement agreement, the DOJ and Brazilian authorities were required to analyze Odebrecht's ability to pay and report to the court. Following this analysis, the DOJ requested that Judge Dearie reduce Odebrecht's criminal penalty.17

Odebrecht and Braskem both settled with the Ministerio Publico Federal in Brazil and the Office of the Attorney General in Switzerland. Braskem, whose American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, settled with the SEC as well.18

Six Companies Reach Settlements in January 2017 Before New Administration Took Office

Rolls-Royce Enters Settlement with US, UK, and Brazilian Authorities to Resolve Global Bribery Probe

In January 2017, UK-based engineering company Rolls-Royce plc (Rolls-Royce) agreed to pay the DOJ $169.9 million in criminal penalties as part of the company's $800 million global settlement with US, UK, and Brazilian authorities.19 The global settlement resolved allegations of criminal conduct connected with a three-decade long, worldwide scheme to bribe government officials in exchange for government contracts in multiple jurisdictions that involved three Rolls-Royce business sectors. Rolls-Royce also agreed to pay more than $600 million to the UK's Serious Fraud Office (SFO), making this the UK's most significant criminal enforcement action against a company; Rolls-Royce further agreed to pay more than $25 million to Brazil's Ministério Público Federal (MPF).20

Under the terms of its DPA with DOJ, which was filed under seal on December 20, 2016, but not made public until January 17, 2017, Rolls-Royce agreed to pay the criminal penalties and continue to cooperate fully with the department's ongoing investigation, including DOJ's investigation of individuals.21 As part of its DPA, Rolls-Royce admitted that, between 2000 and 2013, it conspired to violate the FCPA by paying more than $35 million in bribes through third parties to foreign officials in various countries in exchange for those officials' assistance in providing confidential information and awarding contracts to Rolls-Royce and affiliated entities.22 In connection with its resolution with SFO, Rolls-Royce also admitted to paying other bribes or failing to prevent bribery in multiple jurisdictions from 1989 to 2013. Rolls-Royce's improper conduct transpired in Azerbaijan, Angola, Brazil, China, Kazakhstan, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Malaysia, Nigeria, Russia, and Thailand.23

Las Vegas Sands Pays $7 Million in Criminal Penalties to the DOJ

On January 19, 2017, the DOJ announced that Las Vegas Sands Corporation (LVSC) agreed to an NPA requiring the payment of nearly $7 million in criminal penalties to resolve FCPA charges.24 LVSC admitted that, between 2006 and 2009, its Macao- and China-based subsidiaries paid approximately $60 million to a Chinese consultant, more than $5 million of which was allegedly without any discernible legitimate business purpose.25 Senior executives were repeatedly warned about the consultant's dubious business practices and the high-risk nature of the transactions by an employee and LVSC's outside auditor, yet continued to engage the consultant without conducting enhanced due diligence or taking other risk-appropriate precautions.26

According to the NPA, LVSC received a 25-percent reduction off the bottom of the applicable US Sentencing Guidelines fine range in light of its thorough internal investigation, full cooperation, and extensive remedial measures.27 This DOJ settlement follows LSVC's payment of approximately $9 million in April 2016 to resolve related charges in an SEC administrative proceeding.28

Orthofix Self-Reports, Resolves FCPA Violations with the SEC

On January 18, 2017, Texas-headquartered medical device company Orthofix International N.V. (Orthofix) agreed to pay more than $6 million in disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties to resolve FCPA books and records and internal control charges through an SEC administrative proceeding.29 The SEC alleged that, from at least 2011 to 2013, Orthofix's Brazilian subsidiary made improper payments to doctors employed by government hospitals through third-party commercial representatives and distributors by paying false invoices and providing high discounts to induce the doctors to use Orthofix's products.30 As a part of its settlement, Orthofix also agreed to comply with certain undertakings, including retaining an independent FCPA consultant for a period of one year.31

Orthofix self-reported the misconduct at its Brazilian subsidiary as a part of its obligations under its prior $5.2 million SEC settlement in 2012 relating to FCPA violations at its Mexican subsidiary,32 and for which it also paid the DOJ $2.2 million to settle related charges.33

Chilean Chemicals and Mining Company Settles with DOJ and SEC for Total of $30 Million

On January 13, 2017, chemicals and mining company Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, S.A. (SQM) agreed to pay a $15.5 million criminal fine and to be subject to independent corporate compliance monitoring for two years as part of a three-year DPA that it entered into with DOJ.34 From 2008 to 2015, SQM made donations to dozens of foundations controlled by or closely tied to Chilean politicians, including an official with influence over the government's mining plans in Chile, a key segment of SQM's business.

The company admitted that it knowingly failed to implement internal controls to ensure that payments from a fund under the control of one of its officers were made for services that SQM received.35 SQM also admitted to falsifying its books and records to conceal payments to vendors associated with Chilean politicians. These payments were fraudulently logged as payments for consulting and professional services. In total, SQM paid vendors close to $15 million "despite having no evidence any goods or services were actually received."36 In a related matter, SQM also reached a settlement with the SEC on January 13, 2017, pursuant to which it consented to a cease-and-desist order requiring it to pay a $15 million civil penalty for alleged violations of the FCPA's books and records and internal controls provisions.37

Zimmer Biomet Breaches 2012 Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Agrees to Pay $30 Million

On January 12, 2017, medical device company Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. (Zimmer Biomet) agreed to pay more than $30 million to resolve DOJ and SEC investigations into the company's repeated violations of the FCPA. Zimmer Biomet paid a criminal fine of $17.4 million and civil penalties and disgorgement of $13 million for violating the FCPA's internal control provisions with respect to the company's operations in Mexico and Brazil between 2010 and 2013.38 According to the DOJ, even after the 2012 DPA, the company knowingly and willfully continued to use a third-party distributor in Brazil known to have previously paid bribes to government officials on Zimmer Biomet's behalf. Zimmer Biomet "also failed to implement an adequate system of internal accounting controls at the company's subsidiary in Mexico, despite employees and executives having been made aware of red flags suggesting that bribes were being paid."39 The DOJ and the SEC determined that this misconduct breached a 2012 DPA with DOJ "resolving an earlier investigation into FCPA violations committed by Biomet, Inc., which became part of Zimmer Biomet in 2015."40 Zimmer Biomet previously resolved these FCPA offenses by, among other things, paying DOJ and the SEC a total of close to $23 million in monetary sanctions.

Mondelēz Pays $13 Million to Resolve FCPA Charges Relating to Indian Subsidiary

On January 6, 2017, US-based food and beverage manufacturer Mondelēz International Inc. (Mondelēz), along with its subsidiary Cadbury Limited (Cadbury), entered into an administrative cease-and-desist order with the SEC, agreeing to pay $13 million in sanctions to resolve internal controls and books and records charges relating to the conduct of Cadbury's Indian subsidiary, Cadbury India Limited (Cadbury India).41

The SEC alleged that in 2010, Cadbury India failed to conduct appropriate due diligence on, and monitor the activities of, an agent who was retained to obtain licenses and approvals for a chocolate factory in Baddi, India. The agent allegedly submitted invoices and was paid in cash for, among other things, preparing licenses that Cadbury India employees had prepared. Thus, according to the SEC, Cadbury India's books and records did not accurately reflect the nature of services rendered by the agent, and that Cadbury failed to implement adequate FCPA controls at Cadbury India. Mondelēz and Cadbury neither admitted nor denied the SEC's findings.42

While the SEC noted that Mondelēz failed to identify the relationship between the agent and Cadbury India in connection with its acquisition of Cadbury in 2010, the SEC also noted that Mondelēz conducted an internal investigation and terminated the relationship with the agent, cooperated with the SEC's investigation, and undertook extensive remedial actions with respect to Cadbury and Cadbury India.43

To read this Update in full, please click here.

Footnotes

1. Press Release, SEC, Halliburton Paying $29.2 Million to Settle FCPA Violations (July 27, 2017).

2. Acting Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Blanco, Remarks at the American Bar Association National Institute on White Collar Crime (Mar. 10, 2017); see also Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Trevor N. McFadden, Remarks at Anti-Corruption, Expert Controls & Sanctions 10th Compliance Summit (Apr. 18, 2017).

3. Letter from FCPA Unit, Fraud Section, DOJ to counsel for CDM Smith Inc. (June 21, 2017).

4. Letter from DOJ to counsel for Linde North America Inc. (June 16, 2017).

5. IBM Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 44 (July 25, 2017).

6. Newmont Mining Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 47 (July 25, 2017); Newmont Mining Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 42 (Apr. 24, 2017).

7. Platform Specialty Products Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 31 (May 9, 2017); Platform Specialty Products Corp., Annual Report (Form 10-K), at 26 (Mar. 13, 2017).

8. Harris Corp., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q), at 22 (May 3, 2017); see also Press Release, SEC, SEC Charges Former Information Technology Executive with FCPA Violations; Former Employer Not Charged Due to Cooperation with SEC (Sept. 12, 2016).

9. Innodata Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K), at 29 (Mar. 8, 2017).

10. Merck & Co., Annual Report (Form 10-K), at 103 (Feb. 28, 2017).

11. Crawford & Co., Annual Report (Form 10-K), at 97 (Feb. 27, 2017).

12. Press Release, Cobalt Int'l Energy, Cobalt Announces Closing of DOJ Investigation (Feb. 9, 2017).

13. See Judgment, United States v. Odebrecht S.A., No. 16-cr-00643 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2017), Dkt. Entry 17.

14. Press Release, DOJ, Odebrecht and Braskem Plead Guilty and Agree to Pay at Least $3.5 Billion in Global Penalties to Resolve Largest Foreign Bribery Case in History (Dec. 21, 2016) {hereinafter "Odebrecht & Braskem Press Release"}.

15. See Information, United States v. Odebrecht S.A., No. 16-cr-00643 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2016), Dkt. Entry 1; Information, United States v. Braskem S.A., No. 16-cr-00644 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2016), Dkt. Entry 1.

16. See Plea Agreement at 16-17, United States v. Odebrecht S.A., No. 16-cr-00643 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2016), Dkt. Entry 2.

17. Id.; see also Sentencing Memorandum, United States v. Odebrecht S.A., No. 16-cr-00643 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 11, 2017), Dkt. Entry 15.

18. Odebrecht & Braskem Press Release, supra note 14.

19. See Press Release, DOJ, Rolls-Royce plc Agrees to Pay $170 Million Criminal Penalty to Resolve Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Case (Jan. 17, 2017) {hereinafter "DOJ Rolls-Royce Press Release"}.

20. See News Release, SFO, SFO completes £497.25m Deferred Prosecution Agreement with Rolls-Royce PLC (Jan. 17, 2017) {hereinafter "SFO Rolls-Royce News Release"}.

21. See Deferred Prosecution Agreement at 1–6, United States v. Rolls-Royce plc, No. 2:16-cr-00247 (S.D. Ohio, Dec. 20, 2016), Dkt. Entry 4.

22. See DOJ Rolls-Royce Press Release, supra note 19.

23. See SFO Rolls-Royce News Release, supra note 20.

24. Press Release, DOJ, Las Vegas Sands Corporation Agrees to Pay Nearly $7 Million Penalty to Resolve FCPA Charges Related to China and Macao (Jan. 19, 2017).

25. Letter from Andrew Weissmann, Chief, Fraud Sec., Crim. Div., DOJ to Counsel to Las Vegas Sands Corp. (Jan. 17, 2017).

26. Id.

27. Id.

28. Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, In the Matter of Las Vegas Sands Corp., File No. 3-17204 (Apr. 7, 2016). For further discussion of the SEC settlement, see Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Newsletter, Global Anti-Corruption Insights: Summer 2016.

29. Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order, In the Matter of Orthofix International N.V., File No. 3-7800 (Jan. 18, 2017).

30. Id. at 4-5.

31. Id. at 8-9.

32. Id. at 3, 6; see also Press Release, SEC, SEC Charges Orthofix International with FCPA Violations (July 10, 2012).

33. See Deferred Prosecution Agreement, United States v. Orthofix International, N.V., No. 4:12-CR-00150 (E.D. Tex. July 10, 2012).

34. See Deferred Prosecution Agreement, at 4, 8, United States v. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, S.A., No. 1:17-cr-00013 (D.D.C., Jan. 13, 2017), Dkt. Entry 2.

35. See Press Release, DOJ, Chilean Chemicals and Mining Company Agrees to Pay More Than $15 Million to Resolve Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Charges (Jan. 13, 2017).

36. Id.

37. See Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, at 8, In the Matter of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile, S.A. File No. 3-17774 (Jan. 13, 2017).

38. See Press Release, DOJ, Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. Agrees to Pay $17.4 Million to Resolve Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Charges (Jan. 12, 2017) {hereinafter "DOJ Zimmer Biomet Press Release"}; Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-and-Desist Order, at 11, In the Matter of Biomet, Inc., File No. 3-17771 (Jan. 12, 2017).

39. DOJ Zimmer Biomet Press Release, supra note 38. 40.

Id.

41. Order Instituting Administrative and Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Cease-and-Desist Orders and a Civil Penalty, In the Matter of Cadbury Limited and Mondelēz International, Inc., File No. 3-17759 (Jan. 6, 2017).

42. Id.

43. Id. at 4.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions