United States: Government Contracts Legislative And Regulatory Update - June 2017

Our June edition of "Government Contracts Legislative and Regulatory Update" offers a summary of the relevant changes that took place during the month of May.

Highlights this month include:

  • President Trump issues executive order on strengthening the cybersecurity of federal networks and critical infrastructure
  • Trump administration sends long-awaited FY18 budget request to Congress
  • Senate introduces bill aimed at reforming the process by which federal agencies analyze and formulate new regulations and guidance documents

This update will also be available in Contract Management Magazine, which is published monthly by the National Contract Management Association (NCMA).

Executive Action Update

President Trump issues executive order on strengthening the cybersecurity of federal networks and critical infrastructure

On May 11, 2017, President Trump signed an executive order (EO) aimed at strengthening the cybersecurity of federal networks and our nation's critical infrastructure. The given rationale for issuance of the EO is that the information technology (IT) infrastructure relied upon by the government and, in particular, the executive branch, is antiquated and needs to be enhanced for the sake of our nation's security. In particular, the EO calls for federal agencies to "build and maintain a modern, secure, and more resilient executive branch IT architecture."

The EO is divided into three separate categories, with each section creating requirements for various agencies to conduct assessments and produce reports related to cybersecurity.

The first section of the EO, titled "Cybersecurity of Federal Networks," focuses on federal network risk management. Specifically, it notes that agency heads will be held accountable by the president for implementing risk management measures to reduce or mitigate the harm that would result from a breach of its IT and data. Notably, each agency head is called upon to use the "Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity" (Framework) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In terms of implementation, each agency head must, by August 17, 2017, provide to the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a risk management report that documents the risk mitigation and acceptance choices made by the agency as of May 11, 2017. In turn, the DHS secretary and OMB director will make determinations based on the agencies' risk management reports as to whether each agency's risk mitigation and acceptance choices are adequate. Within 60 days of receipt of the reports, the DHS secretary and OMB director will submit to the president their determinations and a plan to, among other things, protect the executive branch against IT vulnerabilities. Finally, this first section requires agency heads to "show preference in their procurement for shared IT services."

The second section of the EO, titled "Cybersecurity of Critical Infrastructure," requires the secretary of the DHS, the secretary of Defense, the US attorney general (AG), the director of national intelligence, the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and appropriate sector-specific agencies to work in collaboration to: (1) identify authorities and capabilities that agencies could employ to support the cybersecurity efforts of critical infrastructure; (2) engage with and solicit input from critical infrastructure entities to determine how identified authorities and capabilities might be employed; and (3) provide a report to the president by November 7, 2017 (updated annually) that (1) includes authorities and capabilities, and results from the aforementioned engagement with critical infrastructure entities; and (2) makes recommendations for supporting cybersecurity risk management efforts of critical infrastructure entities. Additionally, this second section of the EO calls for the secretary of the DHS and the secretary of the Department of Commerce (Commerce) to provide a report to the president that examines the sufficiency of current federal policies to promote appropriate market transparency of cybersecurity risk management practices by critical infrastructure entities, in particular, publicly traded critical infrastructure entities, by August 9, 2017.

The third and final section of the EO, titled "Cybersecurity for the Nation," requires the heads of several executive agencies to submit a report to the president regarding "the Nation's strategic options for deterring adversaries and better protecting the American people from cyber threats." Additionally, within 30 days after issuance of the EO, several heads of executive agencies are required to submit reports to the president on their "international cybersecurity priorities, including those concerning investigation, attribution, cyber threat information sharing, response, capacity building, and cooperation."

Importantly for government contractors, this EO presents the prospect of expansive contract opportunities for cybersecurity contractors to "build and maintain a modern, secure, and more resilient executive branch IT architecture." Further, given that the EO requires agency heads to show a preference in their procurement for shared IT services, government contractors that provide shared IT services may experience an uptick in business. Correspondingly, contractors that can provide commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) software, or apply their technology across multiple agencies, may gain business if they become shared services vendors. ("Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure," 05/11/2017).

Trump administration sends long-awaited FY18 budget request to Congress*

*Chris W.K. Fetzer, senior advisor in Dentons' Public Policy and Regulation practice, contributor

On May 23, 2017, nearly four months after the statutory deadline, the Trump administration sent its FY18 budget request to Congress. (Notably, President Trump's three immediate predecessors all delivered late budgets during their respective first years in office.) President Trump's budget request is non-binding, and is merely an opening salvo in a budget debate between congressional Republicans, Democrats and the administration. The GOP's leading defense and national security policymakers have proclaimed the president's FY18 request for $639 billion in total defense spending to be dead on arrival. Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) Chairman John McCain (R-AZ) and Representative Thornberry (R-TX-13th), among many others, believe that military readiness and modernization priorities require $700 billion in FY18 total defense spending. Although the rationale underscoring the funding level preferred by Sen. McCain, Rep. Thornberry and other pro-defense spending Congressional defense members has merit, $700 billion in FY18 total defense spending is an unrealistic goal based on existing budgetary constraints and political dynamics. In a departure from President Trump's March 2017 budget blueprint, or "skinny budget," which called for the full repeal of defense sequestration, the president's FY18 budget request doesn't propose such repeal. One individual in particular within the administration was more than likely the driver of this change. Former House member and current OMB Director Mick Mulvaney, a staunch fiscal conservative and long a thorn in the side of the congressional defense policymakers who are advocating for dramatic increases in defense spending, is believed to have wielded more influence than anticipated in the determination of the topline defense spending level in the president's budget request.

Without prior congressional action, defense and domestic spending caps mandated by the Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011 are scheduled to be re-imposed on October 1, 2017, the start of FY18. President Trump is proposing to pay for the FY18 defense spending request, which is $54 billion above the statutory caps, with dramatic spending cuts to domestic agencies and programs. This is a non-starter for congressional Democrats, as well as many congressional Republicans, including those in the latter camp who believe that the soft power capabilities provided via State Department (State) and US Agency for International Development (USAID) programs are vital components of the broader US national security toolkit. Although Congress is very likely to raise the statutory defense spending caps for FY18 to allow for an increase in defense spending, it is unlikely to happen without a corresponding or similar increase in the statutory domestic spending caps for FY18. Recognizing this reality, House Appropriations Committee Defense Subcommittee (ACDS) Chairwoman Kay Granger (R-TX-12th) has expressed that although she would prefer to see an increase in defense spending in line with that proposed by Sen. McCain and Rep. Thornberry, she doesn't believe that an increase beyond that proposed by the president is obtainable.

Work is underway in the SASC and House Armed Services Committee (HASC) on the FY18 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and the committees are sure to produce legislation in June-July 2017 that would fund the Department of Defense (DoD) well above President Trump's request. This will serve as Sen. McCain and Rep. Thornberry's opening salvo in their negotiations with the administration on FY18 defense spending. The ultimate topline defense spending level for FY18 is unlikely to be resolved until a final version of the NDAA is agreed upon in conference in Fall 2017.

President Trump signs Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017 into law

On May 5, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2017. Signed just before expiration of an extant stop-gap emergency appropriation measure, the Act appropriates a total of $1.17 trillion across agencies and sectors, with $593 billion going toward the DoD. That total number includes $516.1 billion in base discretionary funding and $76.6 billion in Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO)/Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) funding. Of specific interest to contractors is $123.3 billion set aside for procurement of equipment, including ships, aircraft, helicopters, missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. Additionally, $73.7 billion was set aside for research and development of new defense technologies.

As discussed in the April Legislative and Regulatory Update, this focus on defense spending and President Trump's plan to bolster the military could prove beneficial to defense contractors, especially in the aviation industry. (H.R. 244 - 115th Cong. (2017-2018)).

Legislative Update

Senate introduces bill aimed at reforming the process by which federal agencies analyze and formulate new regulations and guidance documents

On April 26, 2017, a bipartisan pair of senators, Rob Portman (R-OH) and Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), introduced the Regulatory Accountability Act (RAA) of 2017, which is intended to reform the process by which federal agencies analyze and formulate new regulations and guidance documents. Most notably, the legislation, if passed by the House and signed into law by the president, would require federal agencies to (i) analyze the costs and benefits of new regulations and (ii) adopt the most cost-effective approach to achieve their goals. Additionally, the bill would mandate federal agencies to (i) disclose the information they relied on in their cost-benefit analyses, and (ii) invite early participation from the public on "major" rules (defined below).

Interestingly, agency compliance with the legislation's aforementioned requirements would be subject to judicial review for any "major rule and high-impact rule." A "high-impact" rule is defined in the legislation as any rule that the administrator determines is likely to cause an annual effect on the economy of $1 billion or more, adjusted once every five years to reflect increases in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) of the Department of Labor (DOL). A "major rule" contains the same definition plus the following: any rule that the administrator determines is likely to cause either (i) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, or federal, state or local government agencies; or (ii) significant adverse effects on employment, competition, productivity, investment, public health and safety, innovation or the ability of US-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.

Contractors stand to gain from increased transparency and participation in shaping major rules, as defined in the legislation. (S. 951 - 115th Cong. (2017-2018)).

House passes Modernizing Government Technology Act of 2017

On May 18, 2017, the House of Representatives passed the Modernizing Government Technology Act of 2017. If it becomes law, the Act would require covered agencies to establish an "information technology system modernization and working capital fund." In an effort to revamp and modernize the technology used in federal agencies, the Act would require agencies to deposit into the fund any funds "for the operation and maintenance of legacy information technology systems." Thus, instead of using such funding to continually maintain existing (and outdated) IT infrastructure, agencies would pool their resources towards a larger overhaul of IT systems in part to "mitigate existing operational and security risks" and utilize cloud computing technology. The Act would also create a "Technology Modernization Board" in the Treasury Department to oversee the use of such funds, and would appropriate $250 million toward such modernization efforts for 2018 and 2019.

Contractors in the IT goods and services industry could see increased contracting opportunities to follow based on the Act's goal to "transition legacy information technology systems at the covered agency to cloud computing and other innovation platforms and technologies" and "assist and support agency efforts to provide adequate, risk-based, and cost-effective information technology capabilities that address evolving threats to information security." (H.R. 2227 - 115th Cong. (2017-2018)).

Industry Developments

HASC Chairman Thornberry releases defense acquisition reform proposal*

*Chris W.K. Fetzer, Senior Advisor in Dentons' Public Policy and Regulation practice, contributor

On May 18, HASC Chairman Mac Thornberry introduced the Defense Acquisition Streamlining and Transparency Act (H.R. 2511). The bill has no cosponsors and is intended to be a discussion draft to solicit feedback from Rep. Thornberry's fellow members of Congress, industry professionals, and other public and private sector stakeholders. Since becoming HASC chairman in 2015, Rep. Thornberry has released a defense acquisition reform proposal each year in advance of his committee's consideration of the annual NDAA. Rep. Thornberry's goal is to incorporate many of this year's provisions, with modifications based on stakeholder feedback, into the FY18 NDAA, which the HASC is scheduled to mark up on June 28, 2017. This process has proven to be successful, with the inclusion in the past two NDAAs of defense acquisition reform provisions that originated in standalone proposals introduced by Chairman Thornberry.

According to materials released by the HASC, among other provisions, Rep. Thornberry's proposal would:

  • Require the DoD to contract with "commercial online marketplaces for procurement of certain commercial-off-the-shelf products;"
  • Modify the incurred cost auditing process by raising materiality standards and enabling acquisition personnel "to choose either the Defense Contract Audit Agency [(DCAA)] or a qualified private auditor to conduct . . . audits;"
  • "Raise contract dollar thresholds that [trigger] submission of certified cost and pricing data;"
  • "Establish a centralized Office of Intellectual Property within [the DoD] to standardize [the DoD's] approach toward obtaining technical data . . . and serve as a single point of contact for industry;" and
  • Enhance the training of DoD acquisition personnel.

Although Rep. Thornberry's current proposal has been criticized for failing to pursue groundbreaking changes, the chairman appears to be assessing the defense acquisition reform landscape from a different vantage point than that of his detractors. Rep. Thornberry's year-in, year-out incremental approach to effectuating cultural, policy and process changes in the defense acquisition realm may not be leading to revolutionary improvements. But revolutions on any front don't happen overnight within the DoD, the largest of all executive branch agencies and perhaps the most complex and immovable bureaucracy among its peer agencies as well. Notwithstanding the challenges presented by the DoD's size, structure and comfort level with its antiquated acquisition system, many of Rep. Thornberry's proposed reforms over the past two years have been implemented successfully and are achieving positive results.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
6 Dec 2017, Webinar, New York, United States

Join Dentons for a complimentary webinar focused on the ongoing challenge of integrating new technologies into existing information governance policies and risk management frameworks.

7 Dec 2017, Seminar, Cape Town, South Africa

Dentons South Africa would be delighted if you could join us for our upcoming event.

8 Dec 2017, Seminar, Johannesburg, South Africa

Dentons South Africa would be delighted if you could join us for our upcoming event.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.