United States: Implementing The Border Adjustment Tax: Winners & Losers

Last Updated: May 18 2017
Article by Philip R. Hirschfeld

OVERVIEW

The House plan to tax imports and exempt exports (the "border adjustment tax" or "B.A.T.")1 is part of a tax reform package that is expected to raise more than $1 trillion to offset lower income tax rates and improve U.S. competitiveness against global rivals. It is designed to encourage U.S. companies to move manufacturing operations back to the U.S. or use U.S.-based, rather than foreign-based, manufac­turers.

Sixteen major U.S. companies, including Boeing Co., General Electric Co., and Caterpillar Inc., recently urged Congress to adopt the B.A.T. with an eye toward establishing more competitive pricing for U.S. manufactured goods.2

However, the B.A.T. also raises concerns for certain manufacturers – retooling to a U.S. supply line is costly and can take many years to setup. Of course, the se­verity of the retooling problem may be looked at as a driving reason for adopting a policy of encouraging manufacturing in the U.S. Ultimately, the B.A.T. will not be a winning proposition for all American businesses, as it benefits corporations that are net exporters to other countries, rather than companies who import goods to sell to the U.S. market.

On the international stage, the potential losers and others have already raised a loud outcry against adoption of the B.A.T. The proposal likely will be challenged in the World Trade Organization ("W.T.O.") by member nations that will be harmed by the tax.

Set forth below is a description of those industries that are expected to be helped and harmed by this proposal and an examination of the potential impact on U.S. currency. Also, set forth below are likely arguments that will support a challenge in the W.T.O. and a discussion of the impact on the American consumer – who may be the biggest loser if the plan is adopted. Note that most of the arguments addressed to consumers are championed by retailers that source inventory abroad.

EFFECT ON THE VALUE OF THE U.S. DOLLAR

There is some divergence as to whether the B.A.T. will result in an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar. Since the border tax will materially alter the terms of trade between the U.S. and the rest of the world, the border tax could be expected to lead to a sharp increase in the value of the dollar.3

Per economic theory, there will be a reduction in U.S. demand for imported prod­ucts, and as such, U.S. consumers will transfer fewer U.S. dollars to foreign sellers, thereby reducing the global supply and raising the value of the dollar. Consequently, it would be more expensive for foreign buyers to purchase U.S. goods and cheaper for U.S. importers to purchase goods from overseas. Yet, other analysts believe that the sale of goods will have very little effect on the dollar, as the U.S. has already transitioned from an economy principally based on goods to one based on knowl­edge and technology.4

The dollar could rally 25% – to levels not seen since the 1980's – according to economists, including Harvard University's Martin Feldstein, who was chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors under President Ronald Reagan.5 U.S. holders of foreign assets would see the value of those foreign assets drop. This also sug­gests that the dollar denominated purchase price of foreign produced products will drop. Because many foreigners borrow in U.S. dollars, some commentators have speculated that a global debt crisis may follow for those that do not hedge foreign currency exposure in their home country.6

Martin Feldstein, however, believes that the critics of the border tax have not taken into account that the rise in value of the U.S. dollar will serve to offset any possible price adjustments that may result from the tax. Feldstein illustrates this by looking at the impact on an imported product that now costs $100. The purchase price of this imported product will rise to $125 so that the net effect of the 20% border tax will be a price of $100. Feldstein computes this as follows: the new $125 import price is reduced by a 20% tax on that amount (or $25) so the net price equals the present $100. Feldstein then asserts that "a 25% rise in the dollar would reduce the import cost to $80 – that is, $100 divided by 1.25. The border tax would then raise the domestic selling price to the original $100, so the importer could pay 20% of that and have $80 left to cover the cost of the import."7 Feldstein's technical economic observations that there will be no negative impact to American industry and the consumer have not been embraced by other commentators and have been silenced the critics of the tax.

WINNERS AND LOSERS

Potential winners with regard to the B.A.T. will likely be (i) companies that are U.S. exporters and (ii) companies with significant input costs produced in the U.S. As previously mentioned, the C.E.O.'s of 16 major U.S. companies recently signed a letter to Congress endorsing the B.A.T. (the "Letter"). The signatories represent:

Boeing

Caterpillar

Celanese Corp.

Celgene Corp.

CoorsTek

Dow Chemical Co.

General Electric

Eli Lilly and Co.

McIlhenny Company

Merck & Co Inc.

Raytheon Co.

S&P Global Inc.

Oracle Corp.

United Technologies Corp.

Pfizer Inc.

Varian Medical Systems Inc.

While these businesses have clearly determined that they fit into one or both of the foregoing categories, the following discussion outlines the industries and sectors that are thought to be helped or harmed by the B.A.T.

Aircraft Manufacturers

Companies that produce American-made aircraft for commercial or private use are expected to benefit from the B.A.T. An example is Boeing, which argues that its primary competitor, Airbus, similarly benefits from V.A.T. refunds for non-E.U. sales while Boeing aircraft are subject to V.A.T. in the E.U. However, if Boeing or other aircraft manufacturers import parts or subassemblies as part of their supply chains, they will be adversely effected by the border tax. This may affect the makeup of supply chains for U.S. manufacturers.8 However, the elimination of tax on exports of aircraft should far outweigh the cost of the B.A.T. on subassemblies.

American Consumers

A common theme echoed by many industries is that the B.A.T. will result in higher prices for the American consumer.9

The Americans for Affordable Products Coalition ("A.A.P.C."), a group of 150 busi­nesses and trade coalitions, was formed to protest the B.A.T.10 The A.A.P.C. esti­mates that the tax will raise the cost of everyday products like food, gas and med­icine by up to 20% and threaten millions of jobs. It also indicated that this could have a harmful effect on middle-income American families and result in potentially evaporating 27% of their savings with the increased cost caused by the tax. Some notable members of A.A.P.C. are retailers like Target Corp. and Macy's, Inc., and im­port-focused trade associations like the National Association of Beverage Importers and the National Grocers Association.11

Americans for Prosperity ("A.F.P.") is a conservative political advocacy group in the U.S., which is funded by the businessmen and philanthropist brothers David H. Koch and Charles Koch. A.F.P. opposes the concept of funding lower corporate rates by increasing consumer prices. It criticized the border adjustment plan as a tax on consumers.12

Automotive Industry

No matter where assembled, automobiles sold in the U.S. contain a large number of components produced abroad. One consulting firm recently prepared a report projecting the anticipated price increase that would result from the B.A.T. Ford Motor Co. would raise prices by an average of $282 per vehicle while GM would raise prices a $995 price hike. For other manufacturers, the projected increases are $1,312 for American Honda, $1,672 for Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, $2,298 for Nis­san North America, and $2,651 for Toyota. Mazda Motors imports its full lineup and its projected increase is $5,156 per vehicle. The American International Automobile Dealers Association argues that impact of the B.A.T. will be to lower new car sales.13

Clothing and Apparel Industry

The U.S. clothing and apparel market comprises about 28% percent of the global total. Americans buy nearly 20 billion garments a year – close to 70 pieces of cloth­ing per person. Roughly 2% of that is made in the U.S.14 Thus, B.A.T. is likely to adversely affect this industry severely.

Companies with Locally Sourced I.P.

For politicians concerned about U.S. base erosion from royalty payments for the use of intangible property ("I.P.") owned outside the U.S., the B.A.T. may incentivize corporations to forego transfers of I.P. to foreign affiliates based in low-tax jurisdic­tions. Additionally, if the corporate tax rate falls to 20% or 15%, there may be little incentive left for U.S. corporations to move I.P. offshore.

Energy Sector: Oil Drillers and Refiners

The energy sector in America comprises both drillers and refiners. Domestic drillers stand to benefit from the B.A.T. and support the proposal. However, there is a split among refiners.15

The U.S. is the largest producer of shale oil in the world, and while the U.S. produc­es about 8.6 million barrels of crude oil per day, it imports about 8 million barrels of crude oil on the same basis. Under the B.A.T., the cost of imports would no longer be deductible. Most imports come from Canada, but others come from Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, and Saudi Arabia. Saudi crude oil is shipped to the Saudi Aramco owned plant in Texas.16 Refiners on the east or west coasts, such as Tesoro  Corp. and PBF Energy, rely heavily on this imported crude and are opposed to the tax. Refiners with a better mix of domestic crude and the ability to export fuel prod­ucts are more neutral to the idea.17

There is concern that gas prices may increase by up to 20% for consumers due to the increased tax on imported crude oil. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. projects that U.S. oil prices could surge to $65 a barrel from a recent $54, reflecting a sharp tightening in the supply-demand balance in the U.S. market.18 Internal reports of the American Petroleum Institute have concluded that the proposal will raise gasoline prices by $0.20 per gallon or more in the short term.

This is somewhat less than a recent tax increase per gallon on gasoline sold in the State of New Jersey. Anecdotally, the price increase did not result in less conges­tion within the state.

Supporters of the proposal have argued that the B.A.T. will strengthen the U.S dol­lar, which will offset any short-term surge in gas prices. The American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers ("A.F.P.M.") have also concluded that gas prices will surge. A.F.P.M. tends to represent refiners and cautions that the B.A.T. could have considerable impact on refiners, consumers, and the economy."19

Food and Agriculture Sector

California farmers supply much of the produce that is on the shelves of American supermarkets,20 and most domestic producers – particularly U.S. corn exporters – stand to benefit from the tax. Nonetheless, foreign growers supply a substantial portion, too, especially in the winter months.

Over the last decade, there has been a growing U.S. trade deficit in fresh and pro­cessed fruits and vegetables. Although U.S. fruit and vegetable exports totaled $6.3 billion in 2015, U.S. imports of fruits and vegetables were $17.6 billion, resulting in a gap between imports and exports of $11.4 billion (excludes nuts and processed nut products). This trade deficit has generally widened over time as growth in imports has outpaced export growth. As a result, the U.S. has gone from being a net ex­porter of fresh and processed fruits and vegetables in the early 1970's to being a net importer of fruits and vegetables today.21 This of course may change if consumers shy away from imported products from jams to fruits.

Mexico sold $10.4 billion of fruits and vegetables to the U.S, in 2015 making it the biggest supplier of produce from abroad. Products include tomatoes, avocados, peppers, grapes, cucumbers, melons, berries, and onions. Canada is the second biggest supplier with sales of $2.9 billion in 2015. Bananas are from tropical re­gions. Most of the bananas you buy are grown within 20 degrees on either side of the equator.22

Machinery Manufacturers

The American company Caterpillar is one of 16 signatories to the Letter supporting the B.A.T. It is expected that Caterpillar and its American competitor, John Deere, as net exporters, would stand to benefit from the B.A.T. In comparison, foreign com­petitors such as Komatsu and Mahindra will likely be damaged by the B.A.T. when they import machinery to the U.S. The comparison of U.S. manufacturers and their foreign competitors in this category illustrates a potential weakness of the B.A.T., as the B.A.T. may be construed as a subsidy that provides a financial benefit to U.S. residents. For example, while Caterpillar and John Deere can deduct the cost of goods sold in computing taxable income under the B.A.T., Komatsu and Mahindra are subject to a gross sales tax.

Military Contractors

Since the U.S. is the world's leading arms exporter,23 companies manufacturing military arms and equipment are enthusiastic proponents of the B.A.T. Note that because U.S. law prevents U.S. military technology from being produced outside the U.S., most of the inputs are sourced in U.S. Raytheon and United Technologies are signatories to the letter endorsing the B.A.T.

Retail Industry

The retail industry is the nation's largest private-sector employer, providing and supporting more than 42 million American jobs, and many existing retailers are un­dergoing significant changes brought about by the rise of online competition. With the implementation of the B.A.T., major retailers such as Walmart and Target will be hit with increased costs, as most merchandise they sell is sourced abroad – from apparel to electronics. In fact, 95% of shoes and clothing sold in the U.S. is made elsewhere.24

There is a view that the value of the U.S. dollar will increase as a result of the B.A.T. and that increase will soften price increases. However, officers of major brand cloth­ing have argued it is disingenuous to state that currency changes would even-out the impact of the B.A.T. The comment is reflective of the current almost universal view of U.S. retailers.25

These companies face a choice of absorbing some or all the cost of the tax or pass­ing some or all of the cost to their customers. Neither result is favorable for retailers, and several major retail C.E.O.'s recently met with President Donald Trump and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-T.X.) at the White House to express concerns that the tax would hurt their industry.26 Walmart's an­nounced position is that the added cost is likely to be passed on to the consumers in the form of higher prices when shopping at a brick-and-mortar store or on the internet.

Although retail is generally presumed to be on the losing side of the B.A.T., there are some retailers that could benefit from the tax. Stores that operate primarily in the U.S. and sell to customers who are less price sensitive are within this category. Examples are Neiman Marcus and Saks Fifth Avenue.

Pharmaceutical Industry

While U.S. drug manufacturers and net exporters Eli Lilly, Merck, Celgene, and Pfizer were signatories the Letter, the pharmaceutical industry, which imported over $86 billion in products in 2015, will be largely harmed by the border tax.

This industry is comprised of companies engaged in researching, developing, man­ufacturing, and distributing drugs for human or veterinary purposes. The U.S. is the world's largest pharmaceutical market with $333 billion in sales in 2015 – about tri­ple the size of the second largest market, China. Generic drugs are less expensive for the American consumer and are favored by insurance companies for reasons of cost. India contributes around 30% of the overall volume of pharma products consumed in the U.S.

Directly and indirectly, the industry supports over 3.4 million jobs across the U.S. and added an estimated $790 billion to the economy in 2014.27 No estimate is given by trade associations of the number of jobs that will be lost as a result of the B.A.T. or the reduction in sales that is projected.

Tourism and Higher Education

Tourism is a major industry in America. A stronger U.S. dollar means that, at the margins, fewer foreign persons may visit the U.S. as tourists.28 A stronger dollar also means that Americans planning a vacation may find traveling abroad much less expensive. Thus, vacations outside the U.S. may increase, which would also be harmful to the U.S. tourism industry.

International students comprise a growing share of student population, especially in hard topics such as science and math.29 For those who are not on U.S. dollar de­nominated scholarships, a stronger dollar increases the cost for a foreign students.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION OPPOSITION

The W.T.O. was formed in 1995 and is composed of 164 member nations as of July 29, 2016. The W.T.O. provides a framework for negotiating trade agreements and a forum for resolving trade disputes among members.30

Many commentators have suggested that the B.A.T. would violate W.T.O. rules and precipitate a challenge in the W.T.O. by countries that export to the U.S. U.S. Con­gressman Kevin Brady is the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and the principal advocate for the B.A.T. He is convinced the B.A.T. is compliant with W.T.O. rules. Others believe that it may violate W.T.O. rules because of the inability to include the cost of imports as part of cost of goods sold at the same time that the cost of locally made products can be included in such costs. This may be a form of subsidy that may violate the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.31

The definition of a subsidy is composed of three basic elements: (i) a financial con­tribution (ii) by a government or any public body within the territory of a W.T.O. member state (iii) that confers a benefit.32 All three of these elements must be satisfied in order for a subsidy to exist. A financial contribution requires a charge on government funds. The term includes the relinquishment of government revenue or the failure to collect revenue (as would be the case with a credit or an exemption from tax generally due on domestic sales).33

In February, the German ambassador to the U.S. expressed concern that the B.A.T. may not be consistent with W.T.O. rules, but declined to say whether Germany might file a complaint with the W.T.O.34

THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION'S POSITION

President Trump has not yet reached a final decision on whether to support or oppose the border tax proposal.35 However, President Trump has expressed concern about the plan calling it "too complicated" in an interview with the Wall Street Journal.36

CONCLUSION

Like many controversial issues, belief in the potential adverse effects of the B.A.T. seems to depend on a company's status as a net exporter or net importer of inven­tory. To importers, adoption of the B.A.T. will harm major sectors of the American economy in a significant manner. They believe that the effect will be widespread and will embroil the U.S. in a controversy with its trading partners that will lead to a trade dispute that for resolution in the W.T.O. These companies argue that the ultimate consumers of their product may be the biggest losers through higher prices. Interestingly, industrial labor unions whose members are consumers seem to be quiet on the issue of the B.A.T.

Footnotes

1 The tax on imports is actually an indirect tax since the proposal will deny a deduction for the cost of imported goods, which will increase the taxable gain when those products are later resold. By contrast, the proposal will exempt gain from the sale of exports from tax.

2 Ginger Gibson, "CEOs of 16 U.S. Companies Urge Congress to Pass Border Tax," Reuters, February 21, 2017.

3 Holman Jenkins, "What's Behind the Border Tax Kabuki?," Wall Street Journal, February 17, 2017.

4 Julian Emanuel, "The Winners and Losers of a Border Adjustment Tax," inter­view, Bloomberg, February 14, 2017. Stefan Kreuzkamp, "The Border Tax and Other U.S. Tax Issues," Deutsche Asset Management, February 24, 2017.

5 Martin Feldstein, "The Illusory Flaws of 'Border Adjustment,'" Wall Street Jour­nal, February 26, 2017.

6 Chelsey Dulaney, "Border-Tax Plan Draws Few Bettors," Wall Street Journal, February 14, 2017, B10.

7 Feldstein, "The Illusory Flaws of "Border Adjustment."

8 Kirk Johnson, "Trump Talk Rattles Aerospace Industry, Up and Down Supply Chain," New York Times, February 23, 2017.

9 Patti Domm, "A Plan to Tax Us Imports Has Better Odds of Becoming Law than Many People Think," CNBC, December 21, 2016.

10 Chavie Lieber, "100+ Retailers Are Joining Forces to Combat the GOP Border Adjusted Tax," Racked, February 1, 2017.

11 A full list of AAPC members who stand opposed to the border adjustment tax is set forth ; here.

12 "Americans for Prosperity Holding Republicans Accountable," Americans for Prosperity, February 17, 2015.

13 Nick Bunkley, "Tax Threat Heightens Concern About Affordability," Automotive News, February 13, 2017.

14 Stephanie Vatz, "Why America Stopped Making Its Own Clothes," KQED News, May 23, 2013.

15 Christopher Mathews and Amy Harder, "Border Tax Divides Energy Sector," Wall Street Journal, February 24, 2017.

16 Domm, "A Plan to Tax Us Imports Has Better Odds of Becoming Law than Many People Think."

17 Mathews and Harder, "Border Tax Divides Energy Sector."

18 Dulaney, "Border-Tax Plan Draws Few Bettors."

19 Supra, note 17.

20 Brian Palmer, "The C-Free Diet: If We Didn't Have California, What Would We Eat?," July 10, 2013.

21 Renee Johnson, The U.S. Trade Situation for Fruit and Vegetable Products, Congressional Research Service report (December 1, 2016).

22 "Map of Banana Farms," Chiquita Bananas.

23 Thom Shanker, "U.S. Sold $40 Billion in Weapons in 2015, Topping Global Mar­ket," New York Times, December 26, 2016.

24 Alex Parker, "Border Adjustment a 'Hidden Tax' on Consumers: Wal-Mart VP," Daily Tax Reports 32 (2017).

25 Id.

26 Ben Popken, "Trump Meets with Retail CEOs to Discuss Taxes, Jobs, and Economy," NBC News, February 15, 2017.

27 U.S. Dept. of Commerce, International Trade Administration, 2016 Top Markets Report Pharmaceuticals.

28 Jed Graham, "GOP Border-Tax Plan Would Sock U.S. Tourism – Including Trump Hotels," Investor Business Daily, February 15, 2017.

29 Stuart Anderson, "International Students Are Vital To U.S. Higher Education," International Educator Jan.-Feb. (2017).

30 See "World Trade Organization – Home page."

31 Martin Kohr, "The Planned US Border Tax Would Most Likely Violate WTO Rules – Part 2," Inter Press Service, February 17, 2017.

32 See Fanny Karaman, Stanley C. Ruchelman, and Astrid Champion, European State Aid and W.T.O. Subsidies," Insights 9 (2016), pp. 9, 14.

33 Article 1 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and Arti­cle 16 of G.A.T.T. 1994.

34 Nick Wadhams & Margaret Talev, "German Ambassador Warns Import Tax May Violate WTO Rules," Daily Tax Report 36 (2017).

35 Kaustuv Basu & Aaron Lorenzo, "Confusion Continues on Trump's Take on Bor­der Adjustment," Daily Tax Report 37 (2017).

36 Dulaney, "Border-Tax Plan Draws Few Bettors."

To view the full newsleteer please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.

Disclaimer

Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.

Registration

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.

Cookies

A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.

Links

This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.

Mail-A-Friend

If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.

Security

This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.