United States:
Fed. Circ. Clarifies Scope Of IPR Petitioner
10 April 2016
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
In a previous article titled "
Recent Decisions Shed Some Light on Scope of AIA
Estoppel," Finnegan attorneys
Barbara C. McCurdy and
Arpita Bhattacharyya discussed how the Patent Trial and
Appeal Board's (PTAB) practice of only addressing
instituted claims in the final written decision was adding
uncertainty to the scope of inter partes review estoppel under 35
U.S.C. § 315(e). In this article, the authors discuss how the
Federal Circuit has provided some clarity on the merits of
this PTAB practice and its effect on the estoppel provision.
Previously published by Law360
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Intellectual Property from United States
Are Your NDAs Up To Date?
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) can be used to protect companies' confi dential and trade secret information. But you should resist the urge to have a vendor...
Legal Implications Of New York Times vs. OpenAI
BoyarMiller
The New York Times recently filed a landmark lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement in the training of the chatbot ChatGPT which launched just over a year ago.
