In a report issued on April 10, 2015, the United States Department of Congress, Office of Inspector General, provided its final report on the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's (USPTO's) patent quality assurance practices. The audit was conducted to (1) determine the sufficiency of the USPTO's quality assurance program's processes to prevent the issuance of low-quality patents and (2) assess the additional quality reviews performed to measure examiner performance and ensure that examiners are fully qualified to issue patent determinations without supervisory review.
It identified four areas of concern:
- USPTO's performance appraisal plan and related policies are ineffective at measuring whether examiners are issuing high-quality patents.
- USPTO's official quality metrics may underrepresent the true error rate.
- USPTO is not collecting data that could improve patent quality.
- USPTO's response to patent mortgaging may not discourage abuse.
A full copy of the report can be read by clicking HERE.
These findings are discussed in two articles that we provide to you this week Inspector General: USPTO Needs to Strengthen Patent Quality Assurance Practices and an article that appeared this week in the Washington Post, Patent and Trademark Office doesn't know if examiners are doing their jobs, watchdog says. The USPTO has an outstanding request for comments on its patent quality initiatives and many participants in the patent system will be submitting comments and proposals for improving patent quality. The request for comments is discussed in the article USPTO Patent Quality Call for Papers.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
