In VisionMonitor Software LLC v. Commissioner, T.C.
Memo 2014-182 (Sept. 3, 2014), the Tax Court held that both the
partners and the partnership had zero tax basis in personal
promissory notes contributed to the partnership because the notes
were "only a contractual obligation" and not equal to a
cash contribution.
The partnership was formed in 2002 by two individuals and a
corporation with the funds to keep the business afloat. When the
partnership needed additional funding in 2007, the corporate
partner wasn't willing to contribute additional cash unless the
other partners "put some additional 'skin in the
game,' " according to the court.
The parties agreed to the partners' contributing promissory
notes in 2007 and 2008. The partnership recorded the notes as
assets on its books. The partners increased their outside basis by
the face value (and deducted larger losses on their personal
returns in 2007 and 2008). The notes, however, were poorly drafted
and weren't properly notarized. They also didn't reflect
the correct amounts payable.
The IRS audited one of the partner's and the partnership's
returns for the 2007 and 2008 tax years, which were loss years for
the partnership, and argued that both the partnership and partners
had zero tax basis in the notes. VisionMonitor cited
Gefen v. Commisioner, 87 T.C. 1471 (1986), which involved
a partner who assumed personal liability for existing, third-party
recourse debt of the partnership and agreed to make additional
capital contributions if called upon by the partnership. The Tax
Court distinguished Gefen because neither of the
individual partners was guaranteeing any of the existing
partnership debt. Also, there was no evidence that either partner
would be obligated to contribute to the partnership to fund any
existing debt.
Citing Gemini Twin Fund III v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo
1991-315, the court held that the partners had zero tax basis in
the notes, and until payment is made, the notes are merely a
"contribution obligation to their partnership." The Tax
Court didn't rule on whether the notes would provide additional
basis to the individual partners' outside basis under the
"at risk" rules of Section 465 stating that the
"relevant question isn't whether the notes were a debt
owed by the partners to VisionMonitor, but whether the partners had
basis in the notes."
The Tax Court also did not discuss the Section 704(b) capital
account consequences of a partner's contribution of his/her own
promissory note. Under Reg. Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(d)(2), if a
partner contributes to its own promissory note to his/her
partnership, the partner does not receive capital account credit at
the time of contribution. Rather, the partner's capital account
will be increased with respect to the note only when there is a
taxable disposition of the note by the partnership or when the
partner makes principal payments on such note.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.