The owner of a building open to public use will be strictly liable for damage or injury resulting from a code violation, under a decision issued by Massachusetts' highest court.  Overruling a 15-year precedent, the court held that strict liability is not limited to code violations affecting fire safety (the essence of a 1999 decision), but applies to any code violation of a building subject to public use. 

The case is Sheehan v. Weaver, decided on April 10, 2014 and available here (subscription required).  The inebriated plaintiff had leaned against a second-floor outdoor stair railing and was seriously injured when it gave way.  The railing did not comply with the state building code.  Sheehan sued, arguing that the language of a Massachusetts statute made the property owner strictly liable for any code violation, given the use of the word "building" in the following sentence:

The owner . . ., being the party in control, of a place of assembly, theatre, special hall, public hall, factory, workshop, manufacturing establishment or building shall comply with the provisions of . . . the state building code . . ., and such person shall be liable to any person injured for all damages caused by a violation of any of said provisions. [1]

But the Massachusetts court held that use of the word "building" in the context of other public use facilities is to be construed to mean a building subject to public use.  "This interpretation properly focuses § 51 on structures in which building code violations pose a risk to a significant number of people, . . ."  Just the same, the expansion of strict liability to any type of code violation is a significant change, and will likely bolster attempts to seek redress any time there is a code violation.


[1]  Mass. Gen. Laws chapter 143, § 51.

This article is for general information and does not include full legal analysis of the matters presented. It should not be construed or relied upon as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances. The description of the results of any specific case or transaction contained herein does not mean or suggest that similar results can or could be obtained in any other matter. Each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. The invitation to contact the authors or attorneys in our firm is not a solicitation to provide professional services and should not be construed as a statement as to any availability to perform legal services in any jurisdiction in which such attorney is not permitted to practice.

Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. Duane Morris LLP, a full-service law firm with more than 700 attorneys in 24 offices in the United States and internationally, offers innovative solutions to the legal and business challenges presented by today's evolving global markets. The Duane Morris Institute provides training workshops for HR professionals, in-house counsel, benefits administrators and senior managers.