ARTICLE
20 February 2013

Are Regulatory Burdens Driving U.S. Companies To Pursue Overseas IPOs?

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
This blog focuses on IPOs, including legal and regulatory developments affecting the IPO market, analysis of market practices, and information of interest to all companies planning or hoping to go public.
United States Finance and Banking
WilmerHale are most popular:
  • within Employment and HR topic(s)

Following the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002, many observers predicted that regulatory burdens would drive U.S. companies to go public outside of the United States. The evidence supports this phenomenon, although the absolute numbers are not large and the trend has recently reversed despite the imposition of additional requirements by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010.

Offshore IPOs by U.S. companies grew from barely 1% of all U.S. company IPOs worldwide between 1996 and 2001 to nearly 9% of all U.S. company IPOs worldwide between 2003 and 2010. Since then, however, this percentage has declined to 5% in 2011 and only 1% in 2012, despite the additional burdens imposed by Dodd-Frank. Looking ahead, offshore IPOs may become less attractive to emerging growth companies because of the availability of reduced disclosure requirements for IPOs in the United States as a result of the JOBS Act.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More