We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
Last week, I had the pleasure of spending time with some of my
favorite copyright lawyers at the Copyright Society of the USA
(CSUSA) annual meeting. On Tuesday morning, Jay Rosenthal of NMPA,
Mitch Glazier of RIAA, professor Robert Brauneis and author Robert
Levine discussed the politics of copyright. The following is a
summary of my take-aways and thoughts from that panel
discussion.
From Wikipedia blackouts to coordinated online protests by
companies such as Google, consumers were encouraged to engage in
digital activism (i.e. using social media for lobbying efforts and
other similar movements). These efforts are largely credited with
keeping the Stop Online Privacy Act (SOPA) and the Protect IP Act
(PIPA) from passing Congress this year. Bloggers were eager to
express their opinions about how copyright laws "chill their
user rights". Other citizens throughout the country
contacted their congressmen and women to share concerns, many using
notes prepared by the online companies that opposed the
legislation.
Digital activism played a significant role in politics this year,
but one wonders how long this collective, organized effort will
last. On one hand, Google faces its own issues (such as
allegations of antitrust violations and privacy concerns) and
consumers may not be as supportive of digital activism efforts led
by it as these issues are discussed in the media. Additionally, the
coalitions active in opposing SOPA and PIPA may begin to splinter
from their own internal disagreements related to privacy and terms
of use. On the other hand, grass roots efforts may continue to
grow. The generation that grew up with the internet and
file-sharing is entering the workforce and government service.
Younger legislative staffers and law clerks will continue to
influence politics and law. SOPA, PIPA and similar
legislation may be difficult to pass in the face of this youth
movement and coordinated digital activism.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
As is well known, patent trolls often threaten dozens of alleged infringers in the hope of scoring quick license fees from those who understandably prefer to provide a modest payoff, thereby avoiding expensive and protracted litigation.
In order to best protect the IP rights of a U.S. company seeking to produce goods through a Chinese manufacturer by providing a protected design, the U.S. company needs to take actions even before the contracting stages.
On November 12, 2012, the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of issued the Draft Rules on Inventor-Employee Inventions for public comment, and this article seeks to reconcile the different provisions between the Implementing Rules and the Draft Rules.
A discussion following Shepard Fairey pleading guilty to the misdemeanor charge of criminal contempt for destroying and altering documents in his civil lawsuit against The Associated Press.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling in favor of seven film studios finding that the defendant induced third parties to download infringing copies of the plaintiffs’ copyrighted works.
Video Interview: Discussing Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum With LXBN TV
