We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. Learn more here.Close Me
The SEC published new instructions for the submission of draft
registration statements by emerging growth companies (as permitted
under the JOBS Act) and by foreign private issuers that are not
EGCs (under the SEC's policy) for confidential, non-public review by
the SEC. Such registration statements, exhibits and correspondence
must be submitted to the SEC via a secure e-mail system. Users will
be required to create an e-mail account. All draft submissions must
be in text searchable PDF format and should include a transmittal
letter identifying the issuer and the type of submission. Emerging
growth companies should confirm their status as an EGC in their
transmittal letters. The registration statement, correspondence and
exhibits should each be in a separate file, using simple names to
identify them, such as DRAFTS.pdf for the registration statements,
LETTER.pdf for the transmittal letter and EXHIBIT10.1.pdf for each
exhibit (numbered to correspond to the exhibit number). All SEC
comment letters and other correspondence also will be sent via the
secure email system.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general
guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought
about your specific circumstances.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.
Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.
On March 30, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision imposing certain socio-economic contract requirements on subcontractors operating hospitals associated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Centers.
The Department of Defense has issued a new instruction that establishes internal DOD policies for detecting, avoiding, and remediating counterfeit parts in the DOD supply chain, and allocates responsibility among various DOD offices and functions for administering or developing those counterfeit prevention policies.
The Supreme Court of the United States has recently issued a unanimous decision upholding citizen-specific limitations in the State of Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act.
In 1997, the Virginia Supreme Court sent a chill down the spines of many companies operating under teaming agreements with a Virginia choice of law provision. In W.J. Schafer Associates, Inc. v. Cordant, Inc., 493 S.E. 2d 514 (Va. 1997), that court held a teaming agreement to be unenforceable on the ground that "agreements to agree in the future" are "too vague and too indefinite to be enforced."
