United States: Settlement Pitfalls To Avoid In Order To Maximize D&O Coverage

Last Updated: March 28 2012
Article by Stuart Tonkinson

Recent cases have highlighted pitfalls in the way claims against companies and their officers and directors can be settled that impact coverage under D&O policies. The failure to appreciate the effect of settlements on coverage matters can result in the loss of coverage just when the matter is being concluded, an unfortunate and costly consequence for unaware policyholders. These pitfalls can almost always be avoided by giving prompt consideration to potential D&O coverage issues, long before entering into any settlement, and then revisiting the D&O policies before settlement negotiations begin.

"Disgorgement" is not covered

Disgorgement is a remedy requiring a wrongdoer to return the benefits wrongfully received from another. Claims for disgorgement are viewed as uninsurable both as a matter of common law or public policy and because the specific language in D&O policies typically excludes coverage for losses resulting from the acquisition of an improper benefit. A recent New York case reinforced that rule, finding that any damages denominated "disgorgement" were not recoverable from the D&O carrier.

In J. P. Morgan Securities, Inc. v. Vigilant Ins. Co., the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Bear Stearns & Co. with facilitating late trading and market timing for certain customers.1 The profits from these activities went to Bear Stearns' clients; Bear Stearns itself said it generated only $16.9 million in revenue from the activities.

Bear Stearns ultimately entered into an agreed order with the SEC pursuant to which it would pay $160 million attributed to the benefits its clients had received and $90 million in penalties. Bear Stearns neither admitted nor denied liability.2 Bear Stearns then sought to be indemnified by its D&O insurers for the $160 million payment.3

Unfortunately for Bear Stearns (and its successors), the $160 million was described in the SEC order as "disgorgement." The court had no trouble concluding that, under New York law, disgorgement was not insurable.4 In response to Bear Stearns' objection that it did not actually "disgorge" $160 million because it had not received $160 million in benefits, the court found that the SEC was not required to itemize or trace the proceeds of any wrongful benefit, implying that the $160 million was a rough approximation of the benefit Bear Stearns had received.5 The court also noted that "collaborating" parties could be held jointly and severally liable for wrongfully received benefits.6

Regardless of the court's reasoning, one conclusion to draw from the case is that Bear Stearns lost its ability to recover proceeds for its SEC settlement when it agreed to the characterization of the settlement payments as "disgorgement." A more accurate description of the settlement amounts may have resulted in a more beneficial outcome for the policyholder.

Covenants not to execute prevent an insurable "Loss"

Policyholders frequently try to settle claims against them by entering into agreed judgments coupled with covenants not to execute against any of their assets other than insurance coverage. Whether that strategy can succeed in the D&O context depends on the specific definition of "Loss" in the policy and the applicable state's law.

In U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Federal Ins. Co., claims against former officers of Interstate Bakeries, Inc., which had gone bankrupt, were assigned by court order to a creditors' trust.7 The creditors' trust agreed, with court approval, to seek satisfaction of any claims only from Interstate's D&O policies and not from the officers' personal assets. The creditors' trust then sued an Interstate officer, who tendered defense to Federal, which denied coverage for a number of reasons. The officer then settled the claims with the creditors' trust for $56 million, to be satisfied only from the D&O policies.

The applicable policy language limited coverage to "Loss for which ... the Insured Person becomes legally obligated to pay." The Eight Circuit noted a split in courts as to whether amounts covered by an agreement not to execute are subject to a "legal obligation to pay." The court did not resolve that split, however, noting that the policy language additionally excluded from "Loss" all amounts "for which the Insured Person is absolved from payment by reason of any ... agreement." The court ruled that the agreement not to execute in fact "absolved" the officer from payment of the settlement amount.8 In so concluding, the court rejected arguments that the officer had sustained real consequences from the agreed judgment, including stigma and the risk of increased insurance premiums in the future, noting that the policy language excluded coverage if the officer was absolved from "payment," not from "consequences."9

As a result, Interstate Bakeries' creditors are left with an unenforceable $56 million judgment. This result will complicate the future efforts of insured directors and officers to settle claims against them without exposing themselves to potential personal liability. The lesson in this case is the need for policyholders and their brokers to scrutinize proposed policy language before inception to try to avoid the kind of limiting language found dispositive in this case.

Settling with the primary carrier may limit the ability to tap excess layers

Policyholders continue to learn the hard way that they have lost their ability to obtain coverage from excess insurers because their settlements with primary carriers did not "exhaust" the primary layers of coverage. Before settling with any insurer, policyholders need to know precisely what each of their excess policies states about exhaustion and how that language will be applied in the relevant jurisdiction.

In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. was left exposed to $20 million of legal and accounting costs incurred in defending securities class actions, derivative lawsuits, and an SEC investigation.10 Goodyear had settled with the carrier on the primary $15 million layer for $10 million before pursuing the excess carriers. The excess policy coverage, however, attached only "after the insurers of the underlying insurance shall have paid in legal currency the full amount of the underlying limit." Goodyear argued that the plain language of the exhaustion requirement should not be enforced, because of the strong state policy favoring settlements and because the excess carriers were not prejudiced in any respect because they would be liable for no more than they would have been if the primary policy limits had been fully paid.

The court rejected both of Goodyear's arguments. First, it found that the state policy favoring settlements was trumped by "the equally potent interest in fostering freedom of contract and holding parties to the agreements they make."11 In reaching this conclusion, the court distinguished the clear language used by the D&O polices at issue from the more ambivalent language it found in other insurance contexts. Second, it found that the excess carriers were prejudiced by the mere fact of having to litigate whether the underlying policy limits were exhausted by a less-than-the-limits settlement. Moreover, the court noted that excess insurers base their calculation of premiums on the expectation that their coverage will not attach until and unless there has been full payment of the underlying limits.12 Third, the court found that Goodyear had a high degree of sophistication and could have shopped around for more favorable exhaustion language. The court therefore granted summary judgment to the excess carriers and left Goodyear exposed to the remaining costs.

Carriers have the right to "associate" with any settlement

D&O policies typically grant carriers the right to associate with the defense of any action and require carrier consent to any settlement. The time pressures of litigation often result in policyholders neglecting those policy terms, inadvertently risking the loss of the coverage they expected. A recent case illustrates both the perils facing policyholders and the lengths courts will go to protect them.

In MBIA Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., MBIA, Inc., received the first of several SEC and state attorney general subpoenas in November 2004.13 In September 2005, MBIA sought consent from its D&O insurers to settle potential SEC and AG charges for approximately $75 million. The carriers consented to MBIA's pursuit of settlement discussions. By the end of 2006, MBIA had reached an agreement to pay the regulators $75 million. In addition to the monetary payments, the settlements also required MBIA to retain an independent consultant to investigate certain transactions.

The carriers refused to cover the costs of the independent consultant, claiming they had not been timely advised of the requirement and had not consented to it. The district court agreed, finding that the policyholders had breached the carriers' "right to associate" with the defense and settlement of the claim by agreeing to the independent consultant terms without the carriers' approval.

The Second Circuit reversed, finding that MBIA satisfied its obligations under the policy by providing notice of the claims involved in the settlement discussions "early enough in the process to allow the insurers to exercise their option to associate effectively."14 Although the policyholders failed to provide the carriers with prior notice of the requirement for an independent consultant, the court found that requirement "grew out of the natural course of settlement discussions about the same claim in which the insurers could have participated all along."15 Moreover, the court found that the carriers should have realized that review by independent consultants are "not a rare" component of regulatory settlements. The court therefore reversed the ruling of the district court and ordered entry of summary judgment for MBIA.

Although MBIA was ultimately successful in obtaining full coverage for its settlement obligations, it could have reached this same result with significantly less effort with more timely communications with its carriers. D&O policyholders need to keep their carriers sufficiently informed of the status of settlement negotiations so that carriers cannot legitimately claim to be surprised by the result of those negotiations.


As the above examples illustrate, policyholders who put off thinking about insurance coverage until after settlement may find an unhappy surprise. They may find that they — not their D&O carrier — have to fund the settlement because of mistakes made in the settlement process. But with careful lawyering and timely consideration of coverage issues — before, not after settlement negotiations — these pitfalls can be avoided and coverage can be maximized.


1 936 N.Y.S.2d 102 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011).

2 Thus, there had arguably not been a final adjudication required to support a wrongful conduct exclusion.

3 Although not clear from the opinion, the $90 million in penalties were likely expressly excluded from coverage.

4 Id. at 105.

5 Id. at 107.

6 Id.

7 664 F.3d 693 (8th Cir. 2011).

8 Id. at 698.

9 Id. at 699.

10 No. 08-cv-1789, 2011 WL 5024823 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 19, 2011).

11 Id. at * 3.

12 Id. at * 4.

13 652 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2011).

14 Id. at 168.

15 Id.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.