United States: First Amendment Bars Defamation Suit Against CBS and TV Writer in Libel in Fiction Case

This article first appeared in Entertainment Law Matters, a Frankfurt Kurnit legal blog.

In Tamkin v. CBS Broadcasting, a California appeals court has ruled that the First Amendment — through the state's "anti-SLAPP" law — insulates a television writer's creative process from defamation and invasion of privacy claims.


Plaintiffs, husband and wife real estate agents Scott and Melinda Tamkin, brought a defamation and false light/invasion of privacy action against CBS and one of its writers for the popular show CSI, Sarah Goldfinger. Plaintiffs allege that Goldfinger became familiar with them when they represented the seller of a Los Angeles home that Goldfinger had contracted to buy. Goldfinger got out of the sales contract when a property inspection showed that the house needed extensive repairs.

Some years later, Goldfinger collaborated on a CSI script about a married couple in the real estate/mortgage business, where the wife kills herself and attempts to frame her husband for her murder. In an early writer's draft of the script, Goldfinger called the husband and wife "Scott and Melinda Tamkin." Goldfinger testified that it was common practice in the industry to use real names as placeholders for names of characters in drafts, because the show had so many guest characters that initially using a real name helped her remember the characters.

Within six days of the creation of the draft, the names of the characters were changed. The early draft, however, was used by an outside casting service to make synopses that were sent to casting agents. Among other things, the synopses described the "Scott Tamkin" character as a "slick . . . hard drinking extensive bondage/porn watching man . . . [who] feels his world drop out from under him during the mortgage crisis." In the synopses, the "Melinda Tamkin" character's "death may have occurred during kinky sex in which she was handcuffed to the bed." Not surprisingly, the casting synopses made their way to the Internet, where they appeared on CSI fan and spoiler sites.

The episode as broadcast changed the characters' names to Scott and Melinda Tucker. Scott Tucker was shown very drunk, having recently watched bondage pornography, and Melinda was shown dead, handcuffed to the bed. Melinda had committed suicide and sought to frame her husband for murder because she blamed him for the loss of their house to foreclosure.

Plaintiffs alleged that Goldfinger, after being involved in a "failed real estate transaction" with them sought to embarrass them by "creating from whole cloth characters engaged in a reckless lifestyle of sexual bondage, pornography, drunkenness, marital discord, depression, financial straits, and possibly even murder." Decision at 5. The Tamkins acknowledged that their names were changed in the episode that was broadcast, but alleged that "'the damage was clearly done because of the widespread dissemination on the internet' of casting synopses containing [their] names." Id. at 6.

Defendants made an anti-SLAPP motion to strike the complaint, and after some discovery by Plaintiffs into defendants' policies of using a real person's name or persona (including a deposition of Goldfinger) the trial court denied defendants' motion on the basis that their "act and conduct were not protected by the anti-SLAPP statute." Id. at 9.

The Appellate Court disagreed. First, the Court explained that a "SLAPP suit – a strategic lawsuit against public participation – seeks to chill or punish a party's exercise of constitutional rights to free speech . . . . The Legislature enacted section 425.16 – known as the anti-SLAPP statute – to provide a procedural remedy to dispose of lawsuits that are brought to chill the valid exercise of constitutional rights." Id. (citing Rusheen v. Cohen, 37 Cal. 4th 1048, 1055-1056 (2006)).

The Court then went on to describe the two-part test used to determine if a case should be dismissed under the anti-SLAPP statute: first, whether the defendant sustained its burden of showing that the lawsuit arose from "an act in furtherance of the right of free speech," which would require a showing that "(1) defendants' acts underlying the cause of action and on which the cause of action is based, (2) were acts in furtherance of defendants' right of petition or free speech (3) in connection with a public issue." Id. If that burden was sustained, in the second part of the test the burden would fall to the plaintiff to then demonstrate a "probability of prevailing on the lawsuit . . . ." Id. at 9-10. The Court observed that "[o]nly a cause of action that satisfies both parts of the anti-SLAPP statute – i.e., that arises from protected speech . . . and lacks even minimal merit – is a SLAPP, subject to being stricken under the statute." Id. at 10.

The Creation of a Fictional Television Show is the Exercise of Free Speech

In an important holding for the creative community, the Court found that the defendants satisfied the first prong of the test because the "acts" of, among other things, using the Tamkins' names as placeholders in the early script and casting synopses were acts "in furtherance of free speech." Id. at 11. The Court's reasoning was that the creation of a television show, even a fictional show, was in and of itself an exercise of free speech, and thus that the "acts" of using the plaintiffs' names in connection with "the creation, casting, and broadcasting of an episode of a popular television show" was in furtherance of that exercise. Id.

The Court countered the plaintiffs' arguments that it was not necessary to use their real names as placeholders with a strong statement that the creative process should be protected, not analyzed after the fact to see if it could have been done another way. Relying on the Friends writing room case Lyle v. Warner Bros. (discussed further here on this blog) the Court affirmed that "the creative process must be unfettered, especially because it can often take strange turns . . . [w]e must not permit juries to dissect the creative process in order to determine what was necessary to achieve the final product and what was not . . . ." Id. at 13 (emphasis in original).

The Court also concluded that the defendants' acts were a matter of public interest, pointing to "the posting of the casting synopses on various Web sites and the ratings for the episode" as evidence of the public's interest in the show itself. The Court also affirmatively held that there was no requirement in the anti-SLAPP statute that the Tamkins' personas themselves be a matter of public interest, it was enough that the public was interested in the show.

The Court Finds Plaintiffs' Libel in Fiction Claims Meritless

As for the second prong, whether the plaintiffs' defamation and other claims had minimal merit, the Court concluded that they did not. It reaffirmed the standard for a libel in fiction case, that "a reasonable person . . . would understand that the fictional character therein pictured was, in actual fact, the plaintiff acting as described," and concluded that no reasonable person would have concluded that the Scott and Melinda Tamkin referred to in the draft script and casting synopses were the LA power couple. Id. at 18. Also, the characters in the episode as broadcast were sufficiently different from the real Tamkins (and even went by a different name) to prevent a reasonable person from thinking they were the Tamkins. While plaintiffs pointed out that internet searches such as "scott tamkin bondage" did yield results referring to the casting synopses, it figured that a reasonable person would not formulate such searches in looking for a real estate agent. Id. at 19. Finally, the Court concluded that defendants could not prevail on their false light claims, because those claims were "in substance equivalent to the . . . libel claims," and thus failed for the same reasons. Id. at 20. It remanded the anti-SLAPP motion to the trial court, with a direction to grant it.


In sum, if it stands, this Decision may become an important weapon in the media defendant's arsenal for its clear statement that activities in connection with the creation and broadcast of fictional television programs are protected by the First Amendment. Some might argue, as plaintiffs did here, that by this Decision the Court has "effectively negate[d] defamation and privacy actions with respect to popular entertainment defendants." Id. at 13. The Court's rejoinder? Any defamation or privacy claim that has even minimal merit will proceed regardless of the anti-SLAPP statute. Id. Perhaps it is this statement that provides the most insight into the Court's decision, and the balancing act it performed: the anti-SLAPP statute will not bar a meritorious defamation claim arising from creative works.


This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions