Earlier this year I wrote about the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) announcement in July of its plan to phase-out the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor), the interest rate benchmark used to set payments on more than $350 trillion in financial contracts such interest-rate derivatives, corporate bonds, mortgage loans and more. The FCA's intention is to retire Libor by the end of 2021, or perhaps more accurately, the FCA will cease to regulate Libor after 2021.
Several reasons, including a sharp decline in observable transaction reporting and the resultant susceptibility to manipulation have been cited as the some of the reasons driving the change. Many readers will be familiar with reports of the issues relating to Libor, some good accounts of which can be found here and here.
While the response from commentators to the announcement has been overwhelmingly in favour of a change, market participants must now face reality and consider how they will work with the impending shift away from Libor in the intervening period between now and 2021. It is fair to say that there has been a gradual response thus far. Lawyers and others who work on transactional banking and finance matters on a daily basis continue to see Libor used in credit arrangements, for both new facilities and amendments. Some of us have started to see guidance from banks with respect to Libor alternative language which can be included in credit agreements for new transactions. The alternative rate language continues to reference Libor screen rates although the waterfall of alternate rate provisions, which kick in when certain rates are unavailable, are clearly being firmed up with Libor retirement in mind.
It is expected that daily Libor rates will continue to be published for several years even after the FCA steps aside, so while Libor may not be used as frequently in transactions it will likely still be alive and well in certain respects and in theory, credit arrangements could reference Libor for the foreseeable future so long as it continues to be published.
At the end of the day, because of the alternate rate of interest provisions that are built into credit agreements, it is unlikely that there will ever be a lack of reference interest rate. However, borrowers and credit parties should be aware of these provisions and how such rates are determined as it could have a significant impact on their servicing obligations.
About Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
Norton Rose Fulbright is a global law firm. We provide the world's preeminent corporations and financial institutions with a full business law service. We have 3800 lawyers and other legal staff based in more than 50 cities across Europe, the United States, Canada, Latin America, Asia, Australia, Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.
Recognized for our industry focus, we are strong across all the key industry sectors: financial institutions; energy; infrastructure, mining and commodities; transport; technology and innovation; and life sciences and healthcare.
Wherever we are, we operate in accordance with our global business principles of quality, unity and integrity. We aim to provide the highest possible standard of legal service in each of our offices and to maintain that level of quality at every point of contact.
For more information about Norton Rose Fulbright, see nortonrosefulbright.com/legal-notices.
Law around the world
nortonrosefulbright.com
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
