UK: In The Event Of A Big 4 Failure What Are The Opportunities For Mid-Tier Audit Firms?

Last Updated: 10 November 2006
Article by Richard Curd

The Companies Act 2006 received the Royal Assent yesterday including the provisions enabling auditors in the UK to limit their liability by contract with their audit clients, Click Here to view related article.

However, by the end of 2006, the European Commission is scheduled to table a report for the European Parliament in respect of statutory audit liability within the 25 European Member States. To assist in the preparation of its report, the European Commission has commissioned a detailed and important study by London Economics which has recently been published. The study addressed the following issues:-

  • The economic impact of different audit liability regimes within the European Union
  • The insurance market for audit liability
  • The likely impact if one or more of the Big 4 audit networks was to disappear
  • The various ways in which audit liability can be limited

The report included the results of an extensive survey programme of both auditors and their client companies, together with institutional investors; these results provide some clear pointers for the future development of this market. The purpose of this article is to identify the principal conclusions of the study and to look, in particular, at the implications for the major audit firms in the United Kingdom outside the Big 4.

To view the article in full, please see below:


Full Article

The Companies Act 2006 received the Royal Assent yesterday including the provisions enabling auditors in the UK to limit their liability by contract with their audit clients, click here to view related article.

However, by the end of 2006, the European Commission is scheduled to table a report for the European Parliament in respect of statutory audit liability within the 25 European Member States. To assist in the preparation of its report, the European Commission has commissioned a detailed and important study by London Economics which has recently been published. The study addressed the following issues:-

  • The economic impact of different audit liability regimes within the European Union
  • The insurance market for audit liability
  • The likely impact if one or more of the Big 4 audit networks was to disappear
  • The various ways in which audit liability can be limited

The report included the results of an extensive survey programme of both auditors and their client companies, together with institutional investors; these results provide some clear pointers for the future development of this market. The purpose of this article is to identify the principal conclusions of the study and to look, in particular, at the implications for the major audit firms in the United Kingdom outside the Big 4.

European audit market

In 1986, there were the 8 key audit firms - by 2002, they had become the Big 4. The report shows just how highly concentrated the audit market is for large and very large companies: the Big 4 hold 90% of the audit mandates for banks and insurance companies on regulated markets on stock exchanges across the European Union; they also hold 67% of the audit mandates for non financial companies which is a less pronounced, but still very heavy concentration.

The most important cause of this concentration is thought to be changing client needs over the years rather than, for example, the demise of Arthur Andersen. The audit of major companies requires extensive geographical spread and specialist skills and knowledge which the Big 4 are perceived to have. Given that the trends which have brought about the high levels of concentration are set to continue, what are the barriers to entry for audit firms wishing to try and compete in this market?

Barriers to entry

"Reputation" is viewed as the single greatest obstacle to entry to the market currently dominated by the Big 4; simply put, the Big 4 are perceived to be a "safer bet". Audit client inertia is also a significant factor and surprisingly audit clients change auditors infrequently; of those companies which participated in the survey, more than half had had the same auditors for more than 7 years.

Specifically from a United Kingdom perspective, a survey by Oxera showed that, in 2004, only 1% of FTSE 100, and 2% of FTSE 250 companies changed auditors that year. The most frequent reason given for making a change was the appointment of a group auditor rather than any dissatisfaction with the audit service being provided, or the price being charged. In terms of market concentration only 2% of the firms moved from a Big 4 firm to a mid-tier firm; the vast majority moved to other Big 4 firms.

So, given that geographical spread, capacity and detailed specialised knowledge are viewed by audit clients as significant barriers to entry to the market, is consolidation the answer? To put this question into context, it is worth noting the difference in size between the largest mid-tier firms and the smallest Big 4 firm; even a merger of the three next largest mid-tier firms would produce a firm considerably smaller than the smallest Big 4 firm. In any event, the survey indicates that there is only limited appetite for consolidation between mid-tier firms in the short to medium term. Merger is not, therefore, likely to prove to be a means by which competition in the market will be increased.

Possible contraction of Big 4

The study concludes that audit firms have been faced with a declining availability of coverage in the insurance market at the higher end of the scale and have also experienced significant increased costs of reinsurance for captives which have been established. Against that background, and with considerable assistance from Aon, the study has analysed the historic and current claims experience across the UK and European Union for audit negligence claims. The conclusion is that the Big 4, together with the two largest mid-tier networks, face a number of potential and actual claims which could result in a settlement or award which will "vastly exceed both the available insurance cover and the firm’s own resources"; in particular, 16 claims or potential claims, exceed €160 million and 5 exceed €785 million (or US$ 1billion).

With the assistance of information provided by the Big 4 networks, the authors have sought to identify the "tipping point" for a judgment or settlement which would threaten the existence of one or more of the Big 4 firms. The calculation made takes into account all available insurance coverage (including that which may be provided by captives) and then, on the basis that such an award or settlement will certainly exhaust those resources (given that commercial insurance could only cover 5% of the larger claims currently in existence), the reduction in income which the partners in the firm would be prepared to tolerate for a limited number of years in order to fund the award or settlement. This element has to be for a period, and at a level, which would not cause partners to leave in large numbers with the result that the firm failed in any event; it is suggested that a reduction of 15-20% in income over 3-4 years is the likely limit of tolerance. Given that the Big 4 firms themselves are of varying sizes, the "tipping point" range was from €170 million to €255 million at the lower end and €365 - €540 million for the largest firm.

As the authors so aptly conclude, the risk of failure of a Big 4 firm is "far from nil"; this is further emphasised when it is recognised that €540 million (i.e. the highest "tipping point" ) represents less than 0.3% of market capitalisation of the largest UK company audit client by market size and less than 0.25% of the turnover of the largest UK turnover i.e. the point at which the largest Big 4 firm would fail is but a small fraction of the size or earning power of the largest UK audit clients.

What effect would a failure within the Big 4 have?

If a Big 4 firm did fail (and notwithstanding all the serious difficulties which would inevitably arise on a number of fronts, including disruption to both audit clients and markets), the survey responses indicate that, provided the audit staff from that failed firm stayed in the audit market so that audit capacity was not reduced, then the audit clients of the failed firm would be most likely to move to one of the remaining Big 3. There would be only limited scope for mid-tier firms to acquire clients.

The mid-tier survey respondents were, however, optimistic about the prospects of increasing their market share. There were some grounds for such optimism in this respect from the analysis of the migration pattern of EU audit clients from Arthur Andersen. Whilst the largest companies moved to one of the Big 4 firms, only 61 out of 208 smaller companies (i.e. with a turnover of less than €10 million) did so. So far as the large audit clients are concerned, the mid-tier firms would have to decide whether they were prepared both to invest in acquiring the necessary capacity to compete for them, and also to assume the liability risk which the conduct of those audits carries given that, at the moment, there is exposure to unlimited liability in most EU states.

Legal and regulatory regimes within the European Union

After completing a comprehensive review of the different legal and regulatory regimes for audit liability which pertain in the various EU Member States including this weeks UK legislation, the study concludes that whilst a limitation on auditors’ liability would reduce the risk of Big 4 failure, whichever form of audit liability limitation is put in place, the key issue will remain the level of financial exposure faced by audit firms. This is particularly so given the different systems which currently pertain and it is recognised that a "one size fits all" approach for audit liability within the European Union will not be appropriate.

It will not be straightforward to achieve a level of exposure (in terms of hard cash Euros) which will strike the necessary balance so as to encourage mid-tier firms to attempt to compete in the market currently dominated by the Big 4 firms and yet be high enough to continue to give the necessary incentive to the Big 4 to concentrate on audit quality in the face of increased competition.

Conclusion

There are no easy solutions to the issues regarding audit liability within the European Union with which the European Parliament is seeking to grapple; important developments within both the United Kingdom and Europe are set to take place during 2007 and will continue to be covered on LawNow. Group A firms in particular, are likely to be monitoring progress closely and giving careful thought to their aspirations for the audit market for large companies.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 09/11/2006.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions