UK: The Role Of Dispute Adjudication Boards Under FIDIC: A View From The Courts

Last Updated: 26 November 2014
Article by Anthony Albertini and Rachel Chaplin

The fact that the FIDIC suite of contracts, at clause 20, provides for disputes to be resolved by dispute adjudication board (DAB) prior to commencing arbitration proceedings means that disputes arising out of FIDIC contracts rarely come before the courts. However, two recent decisions provide helpful clarification on the operation of the provisions of clause 20.

Amended FIDIC Silver Book provided for DAB and litigation

In Peterborough City Council v Enterprise Managed Services Ltd, the contract in question was a FIDIC Silver book for a project which involved the design, supply, installation, and testing of a 1.5MW solar energy plant by Enterprise Managed Services (EMS) on the roof of a building owned by Peterborough City Council (the Council). The works were completed late and failed to achieve the stipulated power output. As a result, the Council claimed it was entitled to a price reduction, a fact disputed by EMS.

In Peterborough, Clause 20 of FIDIC Silver Book provided that disputes were to be referred to a DAB, whose decision was to be final and binding unless a notice of dissatisfaction is given, following which (in an amendment to the standard wording) the dispute was to be settled by the courts of England and Wales. Following an unsuccessful attempt to resolve the dispute by mediation, EMS gave notice under the contract that it intended to refer the dispute to adjudication, whereas shortly afterwards the Council issued and served its court claim. EMS issued an application for the court proceedings to be stayed so that the dispute could be referred to the DAB.

Clause 20.2.1 provided as follows:

"Disputes shall be adjudicated by a DAB in accordance with Sub- Clause 20.4 [Obtaining Dispute Adjudication Board's Decision]. The Parties shall jointly appoint a DAB by the date 28 days after a Party gives notice to the other Party of its intention to refer a dispute to a DAB in accordance with Sub-Clause 20.4."

It is clear that the DAB was to be the 'ad hoc' variety, convened to deal with a dispute as and when it arose, not the 'standing' variety, which is in place from the outset of the project. EMS contended that the requirement for disputes to be resolved by a DAB under clause 20.2.1 was mandatory, and accordingly the Council's issue of proceedings was premature and amounted to a breach of contract. Any alternative reading would, EMS submitted, render the subsequent sub-clauses (20.2 to 20.7) redundant.

Clause 20.8.1 defined circumstances when use of the DAB was disapplied:

"If a dispute arises between the Parties in connection with, or arising out of, the Contract or the execution of the Works and there is no DAB in place, whether by reason of the expiry of the DAB's appointment or otherwise:

(a) Sub-Clause 20.4 [Obtaining Dispute Adjudication Board's Decision] and Sub-Clause 20.5 [Amicable Settlement] shall not apply, and

(b) the dispute may be referred directly to the courts of England and Wales under Sub-Clause 20.6 [Final Settlement]."

Was clause 20.8 a general 'opt-out' provision?

The Council argued that the provisions of clause 20.8 effectively allowed an 'opt-out' for a party that did not wish to use the DAB procedure and wanted to go straight to court. In scrutinising the operation of the procedure under clause 20, consideration was given to a perceived flaw in the FIDIC dispute resolution procedure. This occurs where a DAB decision has been given, and one party has given a notice of dissatisfaction, rendering the decision binding but not final. In those circumstances, if the unsuccessful party fails to comply with the decision, arguably the only remedy available to the other party is to refer the dispute arising from the non-compliance to a further DAB. This could lead to a course of consistent non-compliance from one party, thus depriving the other party of an effective remedy.

Court conflicted over forcing parties to submit to DAB

Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart acknowledged that this point was arguable where the standard wording was left intact and an arbitration clause was included, because of the limitations on arbitrators to order specific performance. However, in the present case where the forum for final resolution of the dispute was litigation before the English courts, it was possible for the court to intervene. The judge considered that clause 20.8 was intended to apply to those situations where a 'standing' DAB had been convened, but had, by the time of the dispute, ceased to be in place for some reason. It did not confer a unilateral right on a party to opt out of the adjudication provisions. Accordingly, the judge went on to find that a stay of the proceedings should be granted in order to allow the contractual machinery to be operated, although he had sympathy for the Council's arguments and reservations about forcing the parties to submit to a DAB procedure which was unlikely to be determinative. It is therefore fairly clear, that under English common law, the obligation to refer a dispute to a DAB is a mandatory one.

Open to abuse?

An interesting point raised in the case was the potential ability of the parties to abuse the dispute resolution procedure to avoid compliance. It should however, be remembered that FIDIC is an international contract used in numerous jurisdictions, many of which have civil codes which enshrine the concept of 'good faith' which does not exist under English common law. A recent Swiss case has looked at the relationship between 'good faith' and operation of the FIDIC dispute resolution procedure, and in doing so considered the same provisions as the English court.

The case in question, Decision 4A_124/2014, heard by the Swiss Supreme Court, considered the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal to hear a dispute under a FIDIC contract which had not previously been referred to a DAB. It involved two contracts between a French construction company (the Contractor) and a state-owned entity (the Owner) for construction of part of a national highway. The contracts incorporated the 1999 FIDIC conditions of contract, with the law of the contracts being Romanian law.

Unacceptable delay in constituting DAB led to arbitration

The Contractor claimed to be entitled to approximately EUR 21 million, and notified the Owner of its intention to refer the matter to a DAB in March 2011. Each party nominated an adjudicator but appointment of the DAB chairperson was prolonged for a variety of reasons. By June 2012 they had finally agreed on the chairperson, but had yet to conclude the dispute adjudication agreement (DAA). The following month, the Contractor made a request for arbitration to the ICC and a tribunal was appointed. A couple of months later, in September 2012, the DAB chair circulated a draft DAA. The Owner commented on this in October 2012, suggesting some amendments and inviting the Contractor to comment or confirm its agreement. The Contractor responded that an 18 month period had elapsed since it had first tried to refer its claim to the DAB, and it had thus been forced to pursue the matter via arbitration without first using the DAB. The Owner challenged the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction because the DAB procedure had not been followed.

Was the DAB procedure mandatory or optional?

The parties agreed that the arbitral tribunal should deliver a preliminary award on the issue of its jurisdiction to hear the dispute. This it did, and in January of this year, (almost 3 years after the Contractor had first notified its claim) the tribunal confirmed its jurisdiction. The tribunal found that the procedure at clause 20 was optional rather than mandatory because:

  • Although the use of 'shall' in clause 20.2 was 'general' the use of 'may' in clause 20.4 indicated the DAB procedure was only optional
  • Clause 20.8 allowed the parties to go to arbitration if there had been an attempt to resolve a dispute using the DAB but no DAB was in place
  • The lack of a timescale for convening the DAB gave credence to the idea that the DAB tier was optional (although this was obiter)

In February 2014 an application was made to the Swiss Supreme Court to set aside the tribunal's interim award based on a lack of jurisdiction, relying on provisions contained in the Swiss Private International Law Act.

The Swiss Supreme Court rejected the Owner's challenge, although it disagreed with the tribunal's reasoning. In considering the nature of the provisions at clause 20 it applied a two-stage test, established in previous decisions, as follows:

  • Firstly, an assessment of whether the pre-arbitral tier was mandatory
  • Secondly, if so, whether the party challenging the tribunal's jurisdiction was acting in good faith

The court went on to disagree with the tribunal's finding that the DAB was optional, instead confirming that it was a mandatory pre-arbitration stage. In support of this conclusion it relied on:

  • Use of the word 'shall' in clause 20.2
  • A systematic interpretation of clause 20.2
  • The fact that interpreting clause 20.8 as an opt-out allowing a party to resort to arbitration whenever no DAB was in place would undermine FIDIC's dispute resolution system

How do obligations of 'good faith' affect the position?

In spite of this, it found that the failure to determine the dispute using a DAB before going to arbitration was not fatal to the tribunal's jurisdiction, and in doing so relied on the principle of good faith enshrined in Swiss law. In particular, the Owner's insistence on the mandatory nature of the DAB process was against good faith when it had been primarily responsible for the delays in constituting the DAB, whereas the Contractor had acted in good faith. The court questioned the purpose of forcing the parties to proceed with a DAB at this stage, when the project was over, given that the FIDIC system seemed to favour a standing DAB for resolution of disputes during the project.

Understanding how to manage the DAB procedure

It is clear from these two decisions that the requirement to submit to the DAB procedure in FIDIC contracts is a mandatory one, which cannot be opted out of by relying on the provisions of clause 20.8. It will only be in exceptional cases that the parties will be able to circumvent the DAB procedure in order to go straight to arbitration. Interesting questions are raised by these decisions, in particular, how an English court would deal with the question of inordinate delay and/or bad faith on the part of one party, given the absence of a good faith concept. In addition, how does one address the difficulties of dealing with a party intent on not complying with a binding, but not final, decision, where the ultimate dispute resolution procedure is an arbitral tribunal with limited powers. There are solutions available by amending the original contract wording, for example to provide that the DAB procedure is only to be operated during the course of the project, and once completion has been achieved the parties may choose to refer a dispute straight to arbitration. The problem of non-compliance with a DAB decision may be addressed by opting for litigation, rather than arbitration, so that appropriate orders may be sought. Some parties may prefer not to have a mandatory interim DAB procedure, and remove it altogether. It is useful to at last have consistent judicial guidance on the operation of these provisions from common and civil law courts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions