South Africa: The Bitter Taste Left By Non-Compliance With Procurement Legal Prescripts

Last Updated: 8 October 2013
Article by Adams & Adams

Section 217 (1) of the Constitution1requires that, when organs of state contract for goods and services, they should do so in accordance with a system which is "fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective".   A framework within which  this constitutional requirement must be implemented has been created through various legislative measures including the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 ("PFMA"), Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, 2003,  the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, 2000 ("PPPFA"), The Construction Industry Development Board Act, 2000,  as well as numerous regulations promulgated under these Acts, particularly the regulations promulgated under the PFMA ("Treasury Regulations").   The PFMA Regulations provide for Supply Chain Management systems2 that must be implemented by organs of state, which systems should also comply with the principles contained in section 217(1) of the Constitution. Despite the existence of such regulatory measures, all too often suppliers are confronted with non-compliance by various organs of state with one or more provisions of the above legal prescripts.   This is despite the fact that these legal prescripts have been viewed by our courts as peremptory, such that failure to comply therewith may result in a declaration of invalidity of the administrative act of the organ of state.3 

A classic case of non-compliance was seen in the TEB Properties v The MEC for Department of Health and Social Development, North West4  where a dispute arose after the Department sought to summarily terminate a lease agreement.  The lease related to office accommodation at a monthly rental of R3 241 800 and the main basis for the termination by the Department was that it failed to comply with statutory prescripts.  The agreement was concluded in November 2008 with occupation scheduled to commence almost a year later (i.e. on 1 December 2009), in order to allow the appellant time to construct the accommodation.  When the Department sought to summarily terminate the lease agreement, the Department argued that a contract of this magnitude should have been concluded through a competitive process to allow maximisation of "good value for the government and ensuring economic and effective service from the market"Michael1  in order to comply with the principles set out in section 217(1) of the Constitution as well as section 38(1)(a)(iii) of the PFMA.  However, the argument continued, the accounting officer in office at the time failed to conclude the lease agreement through a competitive bidding process under the incorrect premise that the procurement of office accommodation in this instance was urgent and that the accounting officer was entitled to enter into the agreement without limitations based on the officers interpretation of Regulation 13.2.4.

The court in TEB Properties considered that the PFMA provides, inter alia, that the National Treasury may make regulations or issue instructions in the form of practice notes that will be applicable to all institutions to which the PFMA applies.  The National Treasury has issued practice notes relating to procurement so as to ensure uniform minimum norms. The most relevant of these practice notes is Practice Note Number 8 of 2007/2008 which makes provision for four types of procurement and states that competitive bidding should be employed for contracts over R500 000.  In terms of Treasury Regulation 13.2.4 an accounting officer may enter into lease transactions without any limitations, provided that such transactions are limited to operating lease transactions.  Treasury Regulation 16A6.4, however, allows an accounting officer or accounting authority to deviate from the competitive bidding process, should it be impractical to invite competitive bids to procure the required goods or services.  These regulations prescribe that there be rational reasons for deviating from the competitive bidding process and that the discretionary powers be exercised in accordance with the law and empowering legislation. 

This meant that, while the practice notes prescribe that such a lease agreement should have been concluded after a competitive bidding process had been completed the accounting officer had discretion to depart from this in terms of Regulation 13.2.4 read together with Regulation 16A6.4, provided that there were rational reasons for doing so.  None existed in the TEB Properties case and thus the court correctly found that the lease agreement was invalid for failing to comply with the peremptory requirements.  The appellant argued, based on the Turquand rule, that the failure of the Department to follow the competitive bidding process as it was required to, was an internal formality and that it was unaware that this formality had not been complied with and thus the agreement should be allowed to stand.  The court referred to the Eastern Cape Provincial Government v Contractprops decision where it was stated that where one of the parties has no power in law to conclude a contract and has been deprived of that power (if it ever had it) in the public interest the agreement cannot be held to be valid.  That the other party was misled into believing that the Department had the power is regrettable but that this cannot alter the fact that such agreement is ultra vires the powers of the Eastern Cape Provincial government Department.

The TEB Properties decision leaves a bitter taste for any supplier as in this case the Department entered into the agreement with the full knowledge that it had failed to comply with the peremptory regulations and then sought to cancel the agreement on that very basis.  The Department in this case alleged that the appellant had entered into the lease agreement with (the previous accounting officer) aware that the Department, despite approving the lease, had expressed the view that such transactions are normally done through an open tender process.

Regulation 16A6.4 is a legally valid exception to the rule that contracts over R500 000 should be concluded through a competitive bidding process.  In CEO SA Social Security Agency (SASSA) v Cashpaymaster, non-compliance with a competitive bidding process was allowed to stand on this basis.  This case involved the awarding of a contract for the provision of banking and payment services for the South African public that receive social grants.  SASSA chose not to use the public procurement process in granting the award to the South African Post Office (SAPO).  In this case, SASSA found that using SAPO to provide the required banking services meant that it was getting greater value for money as SAPO was cheaper than the contractors previously used and the Postbank (which operated under SAPO) was more easily accessible to the citizens that received these social grants. 

SASSA stated that its intention was to meet its constitutional object of providing social assistance to the needy and this it did by delegating this duty to SAPO.  Paymaster disputed the manner in which the agreement between SASSA and SAPO was concluded on the basis that SASSA failed to comply with its own procurement policies as well as the peremptory requirements.  The court held that Paymaster had to show that the reasons that SASSA relied on for not making use of the public procurement process were irrational.  While Paymaster was able to show that the reasons were "wrong" in that they did not comply with the requirements for a competitive-process, they could not show that these were irrational and therefore did not fall within the ambit of Regulation 16A6.4.  The court stated that it also needs to consider public interest, pragmatism and practicality before choosing to invalidate an administrative act.5  In this case, the court found that the deviation from the public procurement process was justified in terms of the Regulations and therefore should be allowed to stand, much to the chagrin of Paymaster.

It is clear that a court should not concern itself with whether or not the parties were aware that an organ of state failed to comply with legal prescripts when declaring an act that does not comply with such legal prescripts invalid.  What is also clear is that suppliers in general need to be weary when contracting with organs of state.  This is the case whether the contract arises through a public bidding process or not as there are many cases where a public bidding process was implemented but the organ of state failed to comply with the principles contained in the Constitution and in legislation.  It is concerning that there are very limited cases where a remedy is available to a supplier but when weighed up against the interests of the public and legal certainty, justice is better served by protecting the latter.


1 The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

2 Can be found in regulation 16A of the PFMA Regulations.

3 See Chief Executive Officer, SA Social Security Agency NO & Others v Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd 2011 (3) ALL SA 23(SCA); Eastern Cape Provincial Government & Others v Contractprops 25 (Pty) Ltd 2001 (4) SA 142 (SCA).

4 [2011] ZASCA 243

5 CEO SASSA v Cash Paymaster para 16-29.

Michael1 Please link this with what the "statutory prescripts" required, so you can show what you say was non-compliance with the legal prescript

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions