Search
Searching Content indexed under Corporate/Commercial Law by S Horowitz & Co ordered by Published Date Descending.
Links to Result pages
 
1  
 
Title
Country
Organisation
Author
Date
1
New Bill - Amendments Of The Tax Provisions Concerning Restructuring And Mergers, And An Update On The Helman Case
On February 12, 2017, the Israeli government approved a new bill, proposing amendments to Chapter E2 of the Income Tax Ordinance (New Version), 1961, which deal with tax reliefs for restructuring and merger transactions.
Israel
12 Apr 2017
2
Ansell v. Super Pharm—Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli District Court dated November 28, 2005, in the matter of C.A. 643/05 Ansell Limited v. Super Pharm (Israel) Ltd. et al. (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that the claimant, the owner of the mark "Life Styles", is prevented from raising arguments against the defendant's marks "Life" and "LifeStyle", due to the lengthy period that elapsed since the claimant first became aware of defendant’s use of the marks and, throughout that period, the claimant refr
Israel
3 Aug 2006
3
Are the Marks "CANALI" & and "CANAL JEANS CO. NEW YORK " Confusingly Similar?
In a decision of the Israel Supreme Court dated January 13, 2005, in the matter of Civil Appeal 11/23/04 Canali S.P.A. et al. v. Canal Jean Co. (not yet published), it was held that the mark "CANAL JEAN CO. NEW YORK" (stylized) is not confusingly similar to the "CANALI" mark.
Israel
4 Apr 2006
4
Revocation of the Only Israeli Appellation of Origin, for "JAFFA"
In a decision handed down by the Israeli Registrar of Trade Marks, dated January 9, 2005, it was held that the Israel Appellation of Origin for "JAFFA" (including "Jaffas" and also "Yafo", "Jaffa" and "Jaffas" in Hebrew) ("the JAFFA AO") will not be renewed.
Israel
15 Nov 2005
5
Unjust Enrichment (Restitution)—the Elements Necessary to Establish a Claim for Unjust Enrichment
In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated May 16, 2004, in the matter of L.C.A. 502/04 Buffalo Boots GMBH et al. v. Gali—Chain of Shoe Stores (TK-Supreme 2004(2), 1627), it was held, inter alia, that in order to establish that the enrichment of the defendant is unjust, it should be proven that an "additional element" exists (as previously held by the Court in L.C.A. 5768/94, 5614/95, 993/96 A.SH.I.R Import Manufacture & Distribution et al. v. Forum Cons
Israel
21 Jan 2005
6
Allergan v. B4U—Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli District Court dated January 12, 2005, in the framework of provisional proceedings in the matter of C.A. 2332/04, MCA 20294/04 Allergan, Inc. et al., v. B4U Ltd. et al. (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that respondents’ use of the marks "BOTO EFFECT" and "BOTORELAX" infringe Allergan Inc.’s well-known trademark "BOTOX".
Israel
17 Jan 2005
7
Mcdonald´s v. Mcdonald — Use Of Surname Which Constitutes Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated March 30, 2004, in the matter of C.A. 8483/02 Aloniel Ltd. et al. v. Ariel McDonald (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that Mr. Ariel McDonald’s use of his surname in the framework of televised advertisements in Israel for the fast food chain "Burger King", infringe the trademark rights of the fast food chain, McDonald’s Corporation.
Israel
30 Jun 2004
Links to Result pages
 
1