Search
Searching Content indexed under Trials & Appeals & Compensation by Mark Bentley ordered by Published Date Descending.
Links to Result pages
 
1  
 
Title
Country
Organisation
Author
Date
1
PTAB Analysis Must Include Result Of Prior IPR In Ruling On Dependent Claims
Separately, the same patent was the subject of two other IPRs.
United States
6 Mar 2018
2
Prevailing Party Before PTAB May Not Appeal
The PTAB affirmed the examiner's conclusion of validity.
United States
31 Aug 2016
3
PTAB Exercises Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Patents Involved In IPR
The petitioner, Alarm.com Inc., filed nine IPR petitions seeking review of certain claims in four patents owned by the patent owner, Vivint.
United States
2 Mar 2016
4
Patent Owner Should Have Left "Good Enough" Alone
Appellant Belden owns the patent at issue, which relates to a method of producing a transmission cable.
United States
29 Dec 2015
5
Additional Discovery Scrutinized By PTAB For Scope And Purpose
The petitioner, Arris Group, filed a petition requesting inter partes review (IPR) of claims of a patent that had been the subject of an earlier IPR involving the same parties and different claims of the same patent.
United States
9 Sep 2015
6
Changes In The Law Can Open The Door For Follow-On Petitions
In its first CBM review (CBM2014-00008) ( IP Update, Vol. 18, No. 4), the petitioner Westlake Services requested review of all claims of the patent at issue.
United States
4 Sep 2015
7
Nearly Expired Is Not The Same As Expired: The Board Clarifies Claim Construction Standards For Inter Partes Review
After PersonalWeb sued Apple in district court, Apple filed an IPR petition challenging the asserted patent.
United States
14 May 2015
8
Deposition Of Declarants Is Limited After Routine Discovery
The Board noted that "the declaration was not served recently" and that the patent owner had been in possession of the declarations "for some time."
United States
21 Jan 2015
9
No Appellate Jurisdiction Over Clarifications Of Existing Injunction
In an appeal challenging an alteration to a previously granted preliminary injunction, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that it lacked jurisdiction over an appeal because the appeal was filed more than 30 days after the original injunction and the subsequent alteration did not substantially change the legal relationship between the parties.
United States
4 Nov 2013
10
Ambiguous Claim Terms May Soon Be Construed Against The Drafter
Addressing claim construction of a term with disputed grammar, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part the district court's construction and remanded the case, explaining that grammatical rules give way to the written description when construing claims.
United States
1 Oct 2013
Links to Result pages
 
1