Search
Searching Content indexed under Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration by S Horowitz & Co ordered by Published Date Descending.
Links to Result pages
 
1  
 
Title
Country
Organisation
Author
Date
1
Employee Remuneration For Service Inventions: Collective Regulation May Help Reduce The Exposure Of R&D Companies
A recent precedential decision, issued by the Compensation and Royalties Committee ("the Committee"), in a case in which our firm represented a leading Israeli company...
Israel
12 Feb 2018
2
Excluding The Tax Levied On The Employment Of Foreign Employees In The Calculation Of Minimal Manpower Costs In Public Tenders
The Appellant claimed that in practice, central and municipal government authorities enable the engagement of contractors that employ foreign employees.
Israel
12 Feb 2018
3
The Israeli Supreme Court: Patent Rights Do Not Override Patients' Rights!
The Supreme Court allowed an appeal filed by The Manufacturers Association of Israel, but denied that filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., thereby determining that MSD's patent term extension for ezetimibe has expired.
Israel
12 Apr 2017
4
"Do What Feels Good" — Registration of a Slogan as a Trademark
In a decision of the Israeli Trademarks Registrar dated March 6, 2006, it was held that Coca Cola's trademarks for "DO WHAT FEELS GOOD" consist of a slogan which has no distinctive character and are therefore not acceptable for registration.
Israel
17 May 2007
5
Ansell v. Super Pharm—Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli District Court dated November 28, 2005, in the matter of C.A. 643/05 Ansell Limited v. Super Pharm (Israel) Ltd. et al. (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that the claimant, the owner of the mark "Life Styles", is prevented from raising arguments against the defendant's marks "Life" and "LifeStyle", due to the lengthy period that elapsed since the claimant first became aware of defendant’s use of the marks and, throughout that period, the claimant refr
Israel
3 Aug 2006
6
Are the Marks "CANALI" & and "CANAL JEANS CO. NEW YORK " Confusingly Similar?
In a decision of the Israel Supreme Court dated January 13, 2005, in the matter of Civil Appeal 11/23/04 Canali S.P.A. et al. v. Canal Jean Co. (not yet published), it was held that the mark "CANAL JEAN CO. NEW YORK" (stylized) is not confusingly similar to the "CANALI" mark.
Israel
4 Apr 2006
7
Do Employees Have The Right to Refuse to be Employed by Another Employer, in The Event of an Enterprise "Changing Hands"?
What rights are available to employees and what is their legal status, in the event of an enterprise "changing hands"
Israel
14 Mar 2006
8
Copyright Infringement in Lectures
In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated January 16, 2006, in the matter of CA 8117/03 Eitan Inbar v. Asaf Jacob (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that a textbook published by a student constitutes an infringement of the lecturer's copyright in his university lectures.
Israel
25 Jan 2006
9
Revocation of the Only Israeli Appellation of Origin, for "JAFFA"
In a decision handed down by the Israeli Registrar of Trade Marks, dated January 9, 2005, it was held that the Israel Appellation of Origin for "JAFFA" (including "Jaffas" and also "Yafo", "Jaffa" and "Jaffas" in Hebrew) ("the JAFFA AO") will not be renewed.
Israel
15 Nov 2005
10
Clarifications to Examination Policy
The Israeli Registrar of Trade Marks recently issued several Circulars, addressing the policy of the Israel Trade Marks Office ("the ITMO") with respect to the examination of different types of trademark applications.
Israel
15 Nov 2005
11
Unjust Enrichment (Restitution)—the Elements Necessary to Establish a Claim for Unjust Enrichment
In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated May 16, 2004, in the matter of L.C.A. 502/04 Buffalo Boots GMBH et al. v. Gali—Chain of Shoe Stores (TK-Supreme 2004(2), 1627), it was held, inter alia, that in order to establish that the enrichment of the defendant is unjust, it should be proven that an "additional element" exists (as previously held by the Court in L.C.A. 5768/94, 5614/95, 993/96 A.SH.I.R Import Manufacture & Distribution et al. v. Forum Cons
Israel
21 Jan 2005
12
Allergan v. B4U—Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli District Court dated January 12, 2005, in the framework of provisional proceedings in the matter of C.A. 2332/04, MCA 20294/04 Allergan, Inc. et al., v. B4U Ltd. et al. (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that respondents’ use of the marks "BOTO EFFECT" and "BOTORELAX" infringe Allergan Inc.’s well-known trademark "BOTOX".
Israel
17 Jan 2005
13
Mcdonald´s v. Mcdonald — Use Of Surname Which Constitutes Trademark Infringement
In a decision of the Israeli Supreme Court dated March 30, 2004, in the matter of C.A. 8483/02 Aloniel Ltd. et al. v. Ariel McDonald (not yet published), it was held, inter alia, that Mr. Ariel McDonald’s use of his surname in the framework of televised advertisements in Israel for the fast food chain "Burger King", infringe the trademark rights of the fast food chain, McDonald’s Corporation.
Israel
30 Jun 2004
Links to Result pages
 
1